These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19221199)

  • 1. Parentage and sibship inference from multilocus genotype data under polygamy.
    Wang J; Santure AW
    Genetics; 2009 Apr; 181(4):1579-94. PubMed ID: 19221199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sibship reconstruction from genetic data with typing errors.
    Wang J
    Genetics; 2004 Apr; 166(4):1963-79. PubMed ID: 15126412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computationally efficient sibship and parentage assignment from multilocus marker data.
    Wang J
    Genetics; 2012 May; 191(1):183-94. PubMed ID: 22367033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Parentage and sibship inference from markers in polyploids.
    Wang J; Scribner KT
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2014 May; 14(3):541-53. PubMed ID: 24299450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. COLONY: a program for parentage and sibship inference from multilocus genotype data.
    Jones OR; Wang J
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2010 May; 10(3):551-5. PubMed ID: 21565056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An improvement on the maximum likelihood reconstruction of pedigrees from marker data.
    Wang J
    Heredity (Edinb); 2013 Aug; 111(2):165-74. PubMed ID: 23612692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robustness and power of the maximum-likelihood-binomial and maximum-likelihood-score methods, in multipoint linkage analysis of affected-sibship data.
    Abel L; Müller-Myhsok B
    Am J Hum Genet; 1998 Aug; 63(2):638-47. PubMed ID: 9683590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Parentage and sibship exclusions: higher statistical power with more family members.
    Wang J
    Heredity (Edinb); 2007 Aug; 99(2):205-17. PubMed ID: 17487215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Likelihood-ratio affected sib-pair tests applied to multiply affected sibships: issues of power and type I error rate.
    Holmans P
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Jan; 20(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 11119296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimating quantitative genetic parameters using sibships reconstructed from marker data.
    Thomas SC; Hill WG
    Genetics; 2000 Aug; 155(4):1961-72. PubMed ID: 10924488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of four sib-pair linkage methods for analyzing sibships with more than two affecteds: interest of the binomial maximum likelihood approach.
    Abel L; Alcais A; Mallet A
    Genet Epidemiol; 1998; 15(4):371-90. PubMed ID: 9671987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A simulation module in the computer program COLONY for sibship and parentage analysis.
    Wang J
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2013 Jul; 13(4):734-9. PubMed ID: 23615269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A new method for estimating effective population sizes from a single sample of multilocus genotypes.
    Wang J
    Mol Ecol; 2009 May; 18(10):2148-64. PubMed ID: 19389175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Maximum-Likelihood-Binomial method revisited: a robust approach for model-free linkage analysis of quantitative traits in large sibships.
    Cobat A; Abel L; Alcaïs A
    Genet Epidemiol; 2011 Jan; 35(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 21181896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using genomic relationship likelihood for parentage assignment.
    Grashei KE; Ødegård J; Meuwissen THE
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 May; 50(1):26. PubMed ID: 29776335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimating selfing rates from reconstructed pedigrees using multilocus genotype data.
    Wang J; El-Kassaby YA; Ritland K
    Mol Ecol; 2012 Jan; 21(1):100-16. PubMed ID: 22106925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The relative power of family-based and case-control designs for linkage disequilibrium studies of complex human diseases. II. Individual genotyping.
    Teng J; Risch N
    Genome Res; 1999 Mar; 9(3):234-41. PubMed ID: 10077529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genetic evaluation using parentage information from genetic markers.
    Dodds KG; Tate ML; Sise JA
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Oct; 83(10):2271-9. PubMed ID: 16160036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of single-sample estimators of effective population sizes from genetic marker data.
    Wang J
    Mol Ecol; 2016 Oct; 25(19):4692-711. PubMed ID: 27288989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Linkage analysis of quantitative trait loci: sib pairs or sibships?
    Alcaïs A; Abel L
    Hum Hered; 2000; 50(4):251-6. PubMed ID: 10782019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.