These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19221199)

  • 21. The power of single-nucleotide polymorphisms for large-scale parentage inference.
    Anderson EC; Garza JC
    Genetics; 2006 Apr; 172(4):2567-82. PubMed ID: 16387880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Optimal sibship selection for genotyping in quantitative trait locus linkage analysis.
    Purcell S; Cherny SS; Hewitt JK; Sham PC
    Hum Hered; 2001; 52(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 11359064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Pedigree reconstruction from SNP data: parentage assignment, sibship clustering and beyond.
    Huisman J
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2017 Sep; 17(5):1009-1024. PubMed ID: 28271620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A multivariate model for the analysis of sibship covariance structure using marker information and multiple quantitative traits.
    Vogler GP; Tang W; Nelson TL; Hofer SM; Grant JD; Tarantino LM; Fernandez JR
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):921-6. PubMed ID: 9433601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. About the power of biostatistics in sibling analysis-comparison of empirical and simulated data.
    von Wurmb-Schwark N; Podruks E; Schwark T; Göpel W; Fimmers R; Poetsch M
    Int J Legal Med; 2015 Nov; 129(6):1201-9. PubMed ID: 26292643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Accurate haplotype inference for multiple linked single-nucleotide polymorphisms using sibship data.
    Liu PY; Lu Y; Deng HW
    Genetics; 2006 Sep; 174(1):499-509. PubMed ID: 16783022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sibship T2 association tests of complex diseases for tightly linked markers.
    Fan R; Knapp M
    Hum Genomics; 2005 Jun; 2(2):90-112. PubMed ID: 16004725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Maximum-Likelihood-Binomial method for genetic model-free linkage analysis of quantitative traits in sibships.
    Alcaïs A; Abel L
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 17(2):102-17. PubMed ID: 10414555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. High-resolution joint linkage disequilibrium and linkage mapping of quantitative trait loci based on sibship data.
    Fan R; Jung J
    Hum Hered; 2003; 56(4):166-87. PubMed ID: 15031619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sibship analysis of associations between SNP haplotypes and a continuous trait with application to mammographic density.
    Stone J; Gurrin LC; Hayes VM; Southey MC; Hopper JL; Byrnes GB
    Genet Epidemiol; 2010 May; 34(4):309-18. PubMed ID: 19918759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of genotyping errors on parentage exclusion analysis.
    Wang J
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Nov; 19(22):5061-78. PubMed ID: 20964757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Estimation of migration rates from marker-based parentage analysis.
    Wang J
    Mol Ecol; 2014 Jul; 23(13):3191-213. PubMed ID: 24863365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Performing Parentage Analysis in the Presence of Inbreeding and Null Alleles.
    Huang K; Mi R; Dunn DW; Wang T; Li B
    Genetics; 2018 Dec; 210(4):1467-1481. PubMed ID: 30337340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Integrating sibship data for mapping quantitative trait loci.
    Ghosh S; Reich T
    Ann Hum Genet; 2002 Mar; 66(Pt 2):169-82. PubMed ID: 12174220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Relative accuracy of three common methods of parentage analysis in natural populations.
    Harrison HB; Saenz-Agudelo P; Planes S; Jones GP; Berumen ML
    Mol Ecol; 2013 Feb; 22(4):1158-70. PubMed ID: 23278953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A flexible model for association analysis in sibships with missing genotype data.
    Dudbridge F; Holmans PA; Wilson SG
    Ann Hum Genet; 2011 May; 75(3):428-38. PubMed ID: 21241274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A discordant-sibship test for disequilibrium and linkage: no need for parental data.
    Horvath S; Laird NM
    Am J Hum Genet; 1998 Dec; 63(6):1886-97. PubMed ID: 9837840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessing parent numbers from offspring genotypes: the importance of marker polymorphism.
    Sefc KM; Koblmüller S
    J Hered; 2009; 100(2):197-205. PubMed ID: 18984859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Optimised parent selection and minimum inbreeding mating in small aquaculture breeding schemes: a simulation study.
    Hely FS; Amer PR; Walker SP; Symonds JE
    Animal; 2013 Jan; 7(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 23031385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Large-scale parentage inference with SNPs: an efficient algorithm for statistical confidence of parent pair allocations.
    Anderson EC
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2012 Nov; 11(5):. PubMed ID: 23152426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.