283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19223271)
1. Subgrouping low back pain: a comparison of the STarT Back Tool with the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire.
Hill JC; Dunn KM; Main CJ; Hay EM
Eur J Pain; 2010 Jan; 14(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 19223271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the Swedish STarT Back Screening Tool and the Short Form of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire in patients with acute or subacute back and neck pain.
Forsbrand M; Grahn B; Hill JC; Petersson IF; Sennehed CP; Stigmar K
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Feb; 18(1):89. PubMed ID: 28222707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Subgrouping for patients with low back pain: a multidimensional approach incorporating cluster analysis and the STarT Back Screening Tool.
Beneciuk JM; Robinson ME; George SZ
J Pain; 2015 Jan; 16(1):19-30. PubMed ID: 25451622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison between the STarT Back Screening Tool and the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire: Which tool for what purpose? A semi-systematic review.
Lheureux A; Berquin A
Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2019 May; 62(3):178-188. PubMed ID: 30342997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Association of STarT Back Tool and the short form of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire with multidimensional risk factors.
Simula AS; Ruokolainen O; Oura P; Lausmaa M; Holopainen R; Paukkunen M; Auvinen J; Linton SJ; Hill JC; Karppinen J
Sci Rep; 2020 Jan; 10(1):290. PubMed ID: 31937867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire Short-Form and STarT Back Screening Tool: Correlation and Agreement Analysis.
Fuhro FF; Fagundes FRC; Manzoni ACT; Costa LOP; Cabral CMN
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Aug; 41(15):E931-E936. PubMed ID: 26720177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The predictive ability of the STarT Back Tool was limited in people with chronic low back pain: a prospective cohort study.
Kendell M; Beales D; O'Sullivan P; Rabey M; Hill J; Smith A
J Physiother; 2018 Apr; 64(2):107-113. PubMed ID: 29602747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transcultural adaption and psychometric properties of the STarT Back Screening Tool among Finnish low back pain patients.
Piironen S; Paananen M; Haapea M; Hupli M; Zitting P; Ryynänen K; Takala EP; Korniloff K; Hill JC; Häkkinen A; Karppinen J
Eur Spine J; 2016 Jan; 25(1):287-295. PubMed ID: 25672805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the STarT Back Tool for Arabic speaking adults with low back pain in Saudi Arabia.
Elsabbagh L; Al-Atwi T; Aldossary D; Alshami AM; Hill JC; Abu-Ras W; Huijer HA; Brooks D
J Orthop Sci; 2019 Mar; 24(2):200-206. PubMed ID: 30528225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Risk classification of patients referred to secondary care for low back pain.
Unsgaard-Tøndel M; Kregnes IG; Nilsen TIL; Marchand GH; Askim T
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2018 May; 19(1):166. PubMed ID: 29793536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clustering of patients with chronic low back pain in terms of physical and psychological factors: A cross-sectional study based on the STarT Back Screening Tool.
Yadollahpour N; Zahednejad S; Yazdi MJS; Esfandiarpour F
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2020; 33(4):581-587. PubMed ID: 31658040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reliability and screening ability of the StarT Back screening tool in patients with low back pain in physiotherapy practice, a cohort study.
Robinson HS; Dagfinrud H
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 May; 18(1):232. PubMed ID: 28569152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Low Risk for Persistent Back Pain Disability Is Characterized by Lower Pain Sensitivity and Higher Physical Performance.
Butera KA; Fox EJ; Bishop MD; Coombes SA; Beneciuk JM; George SZ
Phys Ther; 2022 Mar; 102(3):. PubMed ID: 35079824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validity and Reliability of the Japanese Version of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire-Short Form for Chronic Low Back Pain.
Yoshimoto T; Yamada K; Fujii T; Kawamata K; Kasahara S; Oka H; Matsudaira K
Pain Physician; 2022 Jul; 25(4):E681-E688. PubMed ID: 35793192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adding Physical Impairment to Risk Stratification Improved Outcome Prediction in Low Back Pain.
Beneciuk JM; George SZ
Phys Ther; 2021 Jan; 101(1):. PubMed ID: 32970820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. STarT back tool retained its predicting abilities in patients with acute and sub-acute low back pain after a transcultural adaptation and validation to Hebrew.
Ben Ami N; Weisman A; Yona T; Shashua A; Hill J; Pincus T
Musculoskelet Sci Pract; 2020 Apr; 46():102134. PubMed ID: 32217277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Construct validity and reliability of Finnish version of Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire.
Ruokolainen O; Haapea M; Linton S; Korniloff K; Häkkinen A; Paananen M; Karppinen J
Scand J Pain; 2016 Oct; 13():148-153. PubMed ID: 28850521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the STarT Back Screening Tool for Prediction of Low Back Pain Intensity in an Outpatient Physical Therapy Setting.
Toh I; Chong HC; Suet-Ching Liaw J; Pua YH
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2017 Apr; 47(4):261-267. PubMed ID: 28257616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Measuring biopsychosocial risk for back pain disability in chiropractic patients using the STarT back screening tool: a cross-sectional survey.
Khan Y; Lawrence D; Vining R; Derby D
Chiropr Man Therap; 2019; 27():2. PubMed ID: 30675336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The STarT back screening tool and individual psychological measures: evaluation of prognostic capabilities for low back pain clinical outcomes in outpatient physical therapy settings.
Beneciuk JM; Bishop MD; Fritz JM; Robinson ME; Asal NR; Nisenzon AN; George SZ
Phys Ther; 2013 Mar; 93(3):321-33. PubMed ID: 23125279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
