These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19223563)

  • 41. Framing memories: How the retrieval query format shapes the neural bases of remembering.
    Raposo A; Frade S; Alves M
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Aug; 89():309-319. PubMed ID: 27373768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Semantic false memories in the form of derived relational intrusions following training.
    Guinther PM; Dougher MJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 May; 93(3):329-47. PubMed ID: 21119849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Processing fluency affects subjective claims of recollection.
    Kurilla BP; Westerman DL
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Jan; 36(1):82-92. PubMed ID: 18323065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Intent matters: Resolving the intentional versus incidental learning paradox in episodic long-term memory.
    Popov V; Dames H
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Jan; 152(1):268-300. PubMed ID: 35901412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The importance of knowledge in vivid text memory: an individual-differences investigation of recollection and familiarity.
    Long DL; Prat C; Johns C; Morris P; Jonathan E
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Jun; 15(3):604-9. PubMed ID: 18567262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Affective valence influences participant's susceptibility to false memories and illusory recollection.
    Dehon H; Larøi F; Van der Linden M
    Emotion; 2010 Oct; 10(5):627-39. PubMed ID: 21038946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Response bias in "remembering" emotional stimuli: a new perspective on age differences.
    Kapucu A; Rotello CM; Ready RE; Seidl KN
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):703-11. PubMed ID: 18444767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The role of unconscious memory errors in judgments of confidence for sentence recognition.
    Sampaio C; Brewer WF
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Mar; 37(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 19223565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The schema provokes a disparity of false recollection between actions and objects in an everyday scene.
    Yamada R; Itsukushima Y
    Scand J Psychol; 2013 Aug; 54(4):276-82. PubMed ID: 23672299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Recollective experience in the revelation effect: separating the contributions of recollection and familiarity.
    LeCompte DC
    Mem Cognit; 1995 May; 23(3):324-34. PubMed ID: 7791601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [False memory in normal aging: empirical data from the DRM paradigm and theoretical perspectives].
    Abichou K; La Corte V; Nicolas S; Piolino P
    Geriatr Psychol Neuropsychiatr Vieil; 2020 Mar; 18(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 32160987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Are emotionally charged lures immune to false memory?
    Pesta BJ; Murphy MD; Sanders RE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Mar; 27(2):328-38. PubMed ID: 11294435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Levels-of-processing effects on context and target recollection for words and pictures.
    Nieznański M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Sep; 209():103127. PubMed ID: 32603912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. False memories and the DRM paradigm: effects of imagery, list, and test type.
    Oliver MC; Bays RB; Zabrucky KM
    J Gen Psychol; 2016; 143(1):33-48. PubMed ID: 26786732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The effects of study order and backward associative strength on illusory recollection: A source-strength effect does not always occur.
    Franks BA; Butler KM; Bishop J
    Memory; 2016; 24(2):154-64. PubMed ID: 25567737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The effects of divided attention at study and test on false recognition: a comparison of DRM and categorized lists.
    Knott LM; Dewhurst SA
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Dec; 35(8):1954-65. PubMed ID: 18265611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. ERP correlates of Remember/Know decisions: association with the late posterior negativity.
    Wolk DA; Schacter DL; Lygizos M; Sen NM; Chong H; Holcomb PJ; Daffner KR; Budson AE
    Biol Psychol; 2007 May; 75(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 17329007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The contributions of spatial context and imagery to the recollection of single words.
    Lalla A; Robin J; Moscovitch M
    Hippocampus; 2020 Aug; 30(8):865-878. PubMed ID: 31782859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Encoding context and false recognition memories.
    Bruce D; Phillips-Grant K; Conrad N; Bona S
    Memory; 2004 Sep; 12(5):562-70. PubMed ID: 15615315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Novelty effects on recollection and familiarity in recognition memory.
    Kishiyama MM; Yonelinas AP
    Mem Cognit; 2003 Oct; 31(7):1045-51. PubMed ID: 14704019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.