258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19223786)
1. Normal versus high tension glaucoma: a comparison of functional and structural defects.
Thonginnetra O; Greenstein VC; Chu D; Liebmann JM; Ritch R; Hood DC
J Glaucoma; 2010 Mar; 19(3):151-7. PubMed ID: 19223786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the visual function in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome patients and normal-tension glaucoma by means of the multifocal visual evoked potentials.
Gutiérrez-Díaz E; Pérez-Rico C; de Atauri MJ; Mencía-Gutiérrez E; Blanco R
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2012 Nov; 250(11):1681-8. PubMed ID: 22411129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detecting early to mild glaucomatous damage: a comparison of the multifocal VEP and automated perimetry.
Hood DC; Thienprasiddhi P; Greenstein VC; Winn BJ; Ohri N; Liebmann JM; Ritch R
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Feb; 45(2):492-8. PubMed ID: 14744890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical use of multifocal visual-evoked potentials in a glaucoma practice: a prospective study.
De Moraes CG; Liebmann JM; Ritch R; Hood DC
Doc Ophthalmol; 2012 Aug; 125(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 22476612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Morphological and functional differences between normal-tension and high-tension glaucoma.
Häntzschel J; Terai N; Sorgenfrei F; Haustein M; Pillunat K; Pillunat LE
Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Aug; 91(5):e386-91. PubMed ID: 23387808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of normal- and high-tension glaucoma: nerve fiber layer and optic nerve head damage.
Häntzschel J; Terai N; Furashova O; Pillunat K; Pillunat LE
Ophthalmologica; 2014; 231(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 24334967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.
Fortune B; Demirel S; Zhang X; Hood DC; Patterson E; Jamil A; Mansberger SL; Cioffi GA; Johnson CA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Visual Field Defects in Young Patients With Open-angle Glaucoma: Comparison Between High-tension and Normal-tension Glaucoma.
Park JH; Yoo C; Park J; Kim YY
J Glaucoma; 2017 Jun; 26(6):541-547. PubMed ID: 28333895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Can Visual Field Progression be Predicted by Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopic Imaging of the Optic Nerve Head in Glaucoma? (An American Ophthalmological Society Thesis).
Danias J; Serle J
Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 2015; 113():T4. PubMed ID: 26549913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diffuse glaucomatous structural and functional damage in the hemifield without significant pattern loss.
Grewal DS; Sehi M; Greenfield DS
Arch Ophthalmol; 2009 Nov; 127(11):1442-8. PubMed ID: 19901209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of acutely lowering intraocular pressure on the results of multifocal visual evoked potential testing.
Jindal AP; Fleischman D; Leiby B; Spaeth GL; Myers JS; Katz LJ
Acta Ophthalmol; 2011 Nov; 89(7):e550-4. PubMed ID: 21599873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography of Optic Disc in Eyes With Primary Open-angle Glaucoma and Normal-tension Glaucoma.
Toshev AP; Schuster AK; Ul Hassan SN; Pfeiffer N; Hoffmann EM
J Glaucoma; 2019 Mar; 28(3):243-251. PubMed ID: 30624391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of recording duration on the diagnostic performance of multifocal visual-evoked potentials in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.
Fortune B; Zhang X; Hood DC; Demirel S; Patterson E; Jamil A; Mansberger SL; Cioffi GA; Johnson CA
J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(3):175-82. PubMed ID: 18414101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Posterior displacement of the lamina cribrosa in normal-tension and high-tension glaucoma.
Li L; Bian A; Cheng G; Zhou Q
Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 Sep; 94(6):e492-500. PubMed ID: 27009574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optic nerve head morphologic characteristics in high-tension and normal-tension glaucoma.
Iester M; Mikelberg FS
Arch Ophthalmol; 1999 Aug; 117(8):1010-3. PubMed ID: 10448742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of OCT and HRT findings among normal, normal tension glaucoma, and high tension glaucoma.
Shin IH; Kang SY; Hong S; Kim SK; Seong GJ; Tak MK; Kim CY
Korean J Ophthalmol; 2008 Dec; 22(4):236-41. PubMed ID: 19096240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Progression of visual field defects in eyes with different optic disc appearances in patients with normal tension glaucoma.
Nakazawa T; Shimura M; Ryu M; Himori N; Nitta F; Omodaka K; Doi H; Yasui T; Fuse N; Nishida K
J Glaucoma; 2012 Aug; 21(6):426-30. PubMed ID: 22314251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Heidelberg retina tomograph ancillary study to the European glaucoma prevention study: study design and baseline factors.
Hoffmann EM; Miglior S; Zeyen T; Torri V; Rulli E; Aliyeva S; Floriani I; Cunha-Vaz J; Pfeiffer N
Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec; 91(8):e612-9. PubMed ID: 23710686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Visual Field Progression Rates Among the High Tension Glaucoma, Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma, and Normal Tension Glaucoma.
Ballae Ganeshrao S; Senthil S; Choudhari N; Sri Durgam S; Garudadri CS
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2019 Mar; 60(4):889-900. PubMed ID: 30835290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relationship between Humphrey 30-2 SITA Standard Test, Matrix 30-2 threshold test, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients.
Bozkurt B; Yilmaz PT; Irkec M
J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18414106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
