These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19223840)

  • 1. Radiation therapy plan checks in a paperless clinic.
    Siochi RA; Pennington EC; Waldron TJ; Bayouth JE
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2009 Jan; 10(1):43-62. PubMed ID: 19223840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Technical note: electronic chart checks in a paperless radiation therapy clinic.
    Yang D; Wu Y; Brame RS; Yaddanapudi S; Rangaraj D; Li HH; Goddu SM; Mutic S
    Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):4726-32. PubMed ID: 22894397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality assurance for 3D conformal radiation therapy.
    Purdy JA; Harms WB
    Strahlenther Onkol; 1998 Oct; 174 Suppl 2():2-7. PubMed ID: 9810330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Technical Note: Development and performance of a software tool for quality assurance of online replanning with a conventional Linac or MR-Linac.
    Chen GP; Ahunbay E; Li XA
    Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1713. PubMed ID: 27036569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A fully electronic intensity-modulated radiation therapy quality assurance (IMRT QA) process implemented in a network comprised of independent treatment planning, record and verify, and delivery systems.
    Bailey DW; Kumaraswamy L; Podgorsak MB
    Radiol Oncol; 2010 Jun; 44(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 22933903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A daily end-to-end quality assurance workflow for MR-guided online adaptive radiation therapy on MR-Linac.
    Chen X; Ahunbay E; Paulson ES; Chen G; Li XA
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 21(1):205-212. PubMed ID: 31799753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A quality assurance phantom for three-dimensional radiation treatment planning.
    Craig T; Brochu D; Van Dyk J
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Jul; 44(4):955-66. PubMed ID: 10386655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dose quality assurance for stereotactic radiotherapy treatments.
    Perks J; Rosenberg I; Warrington J
    Phys Med Biol; 1999 Oct; 44(10):N209-15. PubMed ID: 10533936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Commissioning and implementation of a stereotactic conformal radiotherapy technique using a general-purpose planning system.
    Mosleh-Shirazi MA; Hansen VN; Childs PJ; Warrington AP; Saran FH
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2004; 5(3):1-14. PubMed ID: 15753935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automating the initial physics chart checking process.
    Furhang EE; Dolan J; Sillanpaa JK; Harrison LB
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2009 Feb; 10(1):129-135. PubMed ID: 19223834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A method to reconstruct and apply 3D primary fluence for treatment delivery verification.
    Liu S; Mazur TR; Li H; Curcuru A; Green OL; Sun B; Mutic S; Yang D
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):128-138. PubMed ID: 28291913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effectiveness of pretreatment physics plan review for detecting errors in radiation therapy.
    Gopan O; Zeng J; Novak A; Nyflot M; Ford E
    Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 43(9):5181. PubMed ID: 27587048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of treatment complexity and computer-control delivery technology on treatment delivery errors.
    Fraass BA; Lash KL; Matrone GM; Volkman SK; McShan DL; Kessler ML; Lichter AS
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1998 Oct; 42(3):651-9. PubMed ID: 9806527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The evolution of quality assurance for intensity- modulated radiation therapy (IMRT): sequential tomotherapy.
    Woo SY; Grant W; McGary JE; Teh BS; Butler EB
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 May; 56(1):274-86. PubMed ID: 12694849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Standardization and automation of quality assurance for high-dose-rate brachytherapy planning with application programming interface.
    Cai B; Altman MB; Reynoso F; Garcia-Ramirez J; He A; Edward SS; Zoberi I; Thomas MA; Gay H; Mutic S; Zoberi JE
    Brachytherapy; 2019; 18(1):108-114.e1. PubMed ID: 30385115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A real time dose monitoring and dose reconstruction tool for patient specific VMAT QA and delivery.
    Tyagi N; Yang K; Gersten D; Yan D
    Med Phys; 2012 Dec; 39(12):7194-204. PubMed ID: 23231270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficiency and safety increases after the implementation of a multi-institutional automated plan check tool at our institution.
    Berry SL; Zhou Y; Pham H; Elguindi S; Mechalakos JG; Hunt M
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Apr; 21(4):51-58. PubMed ID: 32196934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Technical note: the development of quality assurance for Sheffield's radiotherapy treatment planning systems.
    Whilde NJ; Conway J; Bomford CK
    Br J Radiol; 1993 Dec; 66(792):1182-5. PubMed ID: 8293264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of Dosimetry Check software for IMRT patient-specific quality assurance.
    Narayanasamy G; Zalman T; Ha CS; Papanikolaou N; Stathakis S
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 May; 16(3):5427. PubMed ID: 26103501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the accuracy of 3DVH software estimates of dose to virtual ion chamber and film in composite IMRT QA.
    Olch AJ
    Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 22225277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.