These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19224194)

  • 21. Estimating Genetic Relatedness in Admixed Populations.
    Sethuraman A
    G3 (Bethesda); 2018 Oct; 8(10):3203-3220. PubMed ID: 30104261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Optimised parent selection and minimum inbreeding mating in small aquaculture breeding schemes: a simulation study.
    Hely FS; Amer PR; Walker SP; Symonds JE
    Animal; 2013 Jan; 7(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 23031385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Population genetics of autopolyploids under a mixed mating model and the estimation of selfing rate.
    Hardy OJ
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2016 Jan; 16(1):103-17. PubMed ID: 25981126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Genetic variation and population structure of maize inbred lines adapted to the mid-altitude sub-humid maize agro-ecology of Ethiopia using single nucleotide polymorphic (SNP) markers.
    Ertiro BT; Semagn K; Das B; Olsen M; Labuschagne M; Worku M; Wegary D; Azmach G; Ogugo V; Keno T; Abebe B; Chibsa T; Menkir A
    BMC Genomics; 2017 Oct; 18(1):777. PubMed ID: 29025420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Estimating relatedness between individuals in general populations with a focus on their use in conservation programs.
    Oliehoek PA; Windig JJ; van Arendonk JA; Bijma P
    Genetics; 2006 May; 173(1):483-96. PubMed ID: 16510792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparison of identity-by-descent and identity-by-state matrices that are used for genetic evaluation and estimation of variance components.
    Fernando RL; Cheng H; Sun X; Garrick DJ
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2017 Jun; 134(3):213-223. PubMed ID: 28508481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Genome-wide estimates of coancestry and inbreeding in a closed herd of ancient Iberian pigs.
    Saura M; Fernández A; Rodríguez MC; Toro MA; Barragán C; Fernández AI; Villanueva B
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(10):e78314. PubMed ID: 24205195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Triadic IBD coefficients and applications to estimating pairwise relatedness.
    Wang J
    Genet Res; 2007 Jun; 89(3):135-53. PubMed ID: 17894908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Estimation of effective population size from the rate of coancestry in pedigreed populations.
    Cervantes I; Goyache F; Molina A; Valera M; Gutiérrez JP
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2011 Feb; 128(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 21214645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Application of Genomic Estimation Methods of Inbreeding and Population Structure in an Arabian Horse Herd.
    Al Abri MA; König von Borstel U; Strecker V; Brooks SA
    J Hered; 2017 Jun; 108(4):361-368. PubMed ID: 28444202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Estimation of pairwise relatedness between individuals and characterization of isolation-by-distance processes using dominant genetic markers.
    Hardy OJ
    Mol Ecol; 2003 Jun; 12(6):1577-88. PubMed ID: 12755885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Advantages of using molecular coancestry in the removal of introgressed genetic material.
    Amador C; Fernández J; Meuwissen TH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2013 May; 45(1):13. PubMed ID: 23634969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Relative efficiency of the genotypic value and combining ability effects on reciprocal recurrent selection.
    Viana JM; Delima RO; Mundim GB; Condé AB; Vilarinho AA
    Theor Appl Genet; 2013 Apr; 126(4):889-99. PubMed ID: 23224382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Performance of marker-based relatedness estimators in natural populations of outbred vertebrates.
    Csilléry K; Johnson T; Beraldi D; Clutton-Brock T; Coltman D; Hansson B; Spong G; Pemberton JM
    Genetics; 2006 Aug; 173(4):2091-101. PubMed ID: 16783017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparing genome-based estimates of relatedness for use in pedigree-based conservation management.
    Hauser SS; Galla SJ; Putnam AS; Steeves TE; Latch EK
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2022 Oct; 22(7):2546-2558. PubMed ID: 35510790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Friends and family: A software program for identification of unrelated individuals from molecular marker data.
    de Jager D; Swarts P; Harper C; Bloomer P
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2017 Nov; 17(6):e225-e233. PubMed ID: 28503747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Estimating pairwise relatedness from dominant genetic markers.
    Wang J
    Mol Ecol; 2004 Oct; 13(10):3169-78. PubMed ID: 15367129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reduction of inbreeding in commercial females by rotational mating with several sire lines.
    Honda T; Nomura T; Mukai F
    Genet Sel Evol; 2004; 36(5):509-26. PubMed ID: 15339630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Genetic diversity, population structure, and association mapping of agronomic traits in waxy and normal maize inbred lines.
    Sa KJ; Park JY; Choi SH; Kim BW; Park KJ; Lee JK
    Genet Mol Res; 2015 Jul; 14(3):7502-18. PubMed ID: 26214429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The use of genomic coancestry matrices in the optimisation of contributions to maintain genetic diversity at specific regions of the genome.
    Gómez-Romano F; Villanueva B; Fernández J; Woolliams JA; Pong-Wong R
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jan; 48():2. PubMed ID: 26763889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.