These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults. Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tone discrimination and speech perception benefit in Mandarin-speaking children fit with HiRes fidelity 120 sound processing. Chang YT; Yang HM; Lin YH; Liu SH; Wu JL Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):750-7. PubMed ID: 19704359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of front-end processing on cochlear implant performance of children. Wolfe J; Schafer EC; John A; Hudson M Otol Neurotol; 2011 Jun; 32(4):533-8. PubMed ID: 21436756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings. James CJ; Skinner MW; Martin LF; Holden LK; Galvin KL; Holden TA; Whitford L Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 12677112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ten-year follow-up of a consecutive series of children with multichannel cochlear implants. Uziel AS; Sillon M; Vieu A; Artieres F; Piron JP; Daures JP; Mondain M Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):615-28. PubMed ID: 17667770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Benefits of short interimplant delays in children receiving bilateral cochlear implants. Gordon KA; Papsin BC Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):319-31. PubMed ID: 19318886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of presentation level on phoneme and sentence recognition in quiet by cochlear implant listeners. Donaldson GS; Allen SL Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):392-405. PubMed ID: 14534410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study. Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Initial clinical experience with a totally implantable cochlear implant research device. Briggs RJ; Eder HC; Seligman PM; Cowan RS; Plant KL; Dalton J; Money DK; Patrick JF Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):114-9. PubMed ID: 17898671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of FM-receiver gain on speech-recognition performance of adults with cochlear implants. Schafer EC; Wolfe J; Lawless T; Stout B Int J Audiol; 2009 Apr; 48(4):196-203. PubMed ID: 19363720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of the growth of open-set speech perception between the nucleus 22 and nucleus 24 cochlear implant systems. Waltzman SB; Cohen NL; Roland JT Am J Otol; 1999 Jul; 20(4):435-41. PubMed ID: 10431883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants. Galvin KL; Mok M; Dowell RC Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Speech-perception performance in prelingually deafened French children using the nucleus multichannel cochlear implant. Uziel AS; Reuillard-Artieres F; Sillon M; Vieu A; Mondain M; Piron JP; Tobey EA Am J Otol; 1996 Jul; 17(4):559-68. PubMed ID: 8841701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of input processing and type of personal frequency modulation system on speech-recognition performance of adults with cochlear implants. Wolfe J; Schafer E; Parkinson A; John A; Hudson M; Wheeler J; Mucci A Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):52-62. PubMed ID: 22941405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Speech perception with the ACE and the SPEAK speech coding strategies for children implanted with the Nucleus cochlear implant. Manrique M; Huarte A; Morera C; Caballé L; Ramos A; Castillo C; García-Ibáñez L; Estrada E; Juan E Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2005 Dec; 69(12):1667-74. PubMed ID: 16168497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. HiResolution and conventional sound processing in the HiResolution bionic ear: using appropriate outcome measures to assess speech recognition ability. Koch DB; Osberger MJ; Segel P; Kessler D Audiol Neurootol; 2004; 9(4):214-23. PubMed ID: 15205549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]