These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19226097)
1. Primary ceramic-on-ceramic total hip replacement versus metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in young active patients. Pattyn C; De Smet KA Orthopedics; 2008 Nov; 31(11):1078. PubMed ID: 19226097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Uncemented ceramic-on-ceramic THA in adults with osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Millar NL; Halai M; McKenna R; McGraw IW; Millar LL; Hadidi M Orthopedics; 2010 Nov; 33(11):795. PubMed ID: 21053883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ten-year results after cementless THA with a sandwich-type alumina ceramic bearing. Park YS; Park SJ; Lim SJ Orthopedics; 2010 Nov; 33(11):796. PubMed ID: 21053885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Randomized Seven-Year Study on Performance of the Stemmed Metal M2a-Magnum and Ceramic C2a-Taper, and the Resurfacing ReCap Hip Implants. Borgwardt A; Borgwardt L; Zerahn B; Daugaard H; Borgwardt L; Ribel-Madsen S J Arthroplasty; 2018 May; 33(5):1412-1420. PubMed ID: 29276121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Total hip arthroplasty survival in femoral head avascular necrosis versus primary hip osteoarthritis: Case-control study with a mean 10-year follow-up after anatomical cementless metal-on-metal 28-mm replacement. Ancelin D; Reina N; Cavaignac E; Delclaux S; Chiron P Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2016 Dec; 102(8):1029-1034. PubMed ID: 28341264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is There a Difference in Revision Risk Between Metal and Ceramic Heads on Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene Liners? Cafri G; Paxton EW; Love R; Bini SA; Kurtz SM Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 May; 475(5):1349-1355. PubMed ID: 27385222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of cementless total hip arthroplasty survivorship between metal-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene and ceramic on ceramic bearings: A case control study with a 5-9-year follow-up. Higuchi Y; Seki T; Hasegawa Y; Morita D; Komatsu D; Takegami Y; Ishiguro N Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2018 Sep; 104(5):663-669. PubMed ID: 29902637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of total hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty - patients and outcomes. Fowble VA; dela Rosa MA; Schmalzried TP Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 19583535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. What Is the Rerevision Rate After Revising a Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty? Analysis From the AOANJRR. Wong JM; Liu YL; Graves S; de Steiger R Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3458-64. PubMed ID: 25721576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Total hip replacement arthroplasty with Mallory-Head system--minimum ten-year follow-up results. Song JH; Kim DH; Kim J Int Orthop; 2012 Oct; 36(10):2055-9. PubMed ID: 22864458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Serum-cobalt levels with metal-on-metal bearings in the cement-free total hip arthroplasty results covering two years; prospective study. Weissinger M; Grübl A; Pöll G Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2011; 78(5):410-5. PubMed ID: 22094154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The early results of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing - a prospective study at a minimum two-year follow-up. Bergeron SG; Desy NM; Nikolaou VS; Debiparshad K; Antoniou J Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(2):132-4. PubMed ID: 19583540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip. A five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing. Pollard TC; Baker RP; Eastaugh-Waring SJ; Bannister GC J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 May; 88(5):592-600. PubMed ID: 16645103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Two-Year Results of Ceramic-on-Ceramic Hip Resurfacing in an International Multicenter Cohort. Lin D; Xu J; Weinrauch P; Young DA; De Smet K; Manktelow A; Beaulé PE; Walter WL J Arthroplasty; 2024 Nov; 39(11):2800-2806. PubMed ID: 38782243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Third-generation ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 30 years with osteonecrosis of femoral head. Byun JW; Yoon TR; Park KS; Seon JK J Arthroplasty; 2012 Aug; 27(7):1337-43. PubMed ID: 22153948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Nine years follow-up of 100 ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty. Chevillotte C; Pibarot V; Carret JP; Bejui-Hugues J; Guyen O Int Orthop; 2011 Nov; 35(11):1599-604. PubMed ID: 21174208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Oxidized zirconium head on crosslinked polyethylene liner in total hip arthroplasty: a 7- to 12-year in vivo comparative wear study. Karidakis GK; Karachalios T Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3836-45. PubMed ID: 26290343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Results of Conserve Plus® metal-on-metal hip resurfacing for post-traumatic arthritis and osteonecrosis. Woon RP; Johnson AJ; Amstutz HC Hip Int; 2012; 22(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 22547372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Metal-on-metal resurfacing versus total hip replacement-the value of a randomized clinical trial. Howie DW; McGee MA; Costi K; Graves SE Orthop Clin North Am; 2005 Apr; 36(2):195-201, ix. PubMed ID: 15833457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ceramic-Ceramic Hip Arthroplasty for Osteonecrosis: Average 5-year Follow-up in Patients Less Than 50 Years of Age. Evangelista PJ; Kamath AF; Aversano FJ; Silvestre J; Lee GC; Nelson CL Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013); 2015 Mar; 73(1):42-5. PubMed ID: 26517000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]