151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19226203)
21. Ertapenem prophylaxis of surgical site infections in elective colorectal surgery in China: a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study.
Leng XS; Zhao YJ; Qiu HZ; Cao YK; Zhu WH; Shen JF; Paschke A; Dai WM; Caldwell N; Wang J
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2014 Dec; 69(12):3379-86. PubMed ID: 25151205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Operative site bacteriology as an indicator of postoperative infectious complications in elective colorectal surgery.
Grant SW; Hopkins J; Wilson SE
Am Surg; 1995 Oct; 61(10):856-61. PubMed ID: 7668457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Integrated pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling to evaluate antimicrobial prophylaxis in abdominal surgery.
Zelenitsky SA; Lawson C; Calic D; Ariano RE; Roberts JA; Lipman J; Zhanel GG
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2016 Oct; 71(10):2902-8. PubMed ID: 27402005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Infectious chemoprophylaxis in colorectal surgery. A multicenter study of imipenem-cilastatin vs. cefuroxime and metronidazole or cefotetan].
Sortini A; Liguori G; Bardini R; Infantino A; Carrella G; Asolati A
G Chir; 1991; 12(6-7):393-5. PubMed ID: 1751328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Antimicrobial susceptibility of clinically isolated anaerobic bacteria in a University Hospital Centre Split, Croatia in 2013.
Novak A; Rubic Z; Dogas V; Goic-Barisic I; Radic M; Tonkic M
Anaerobe; 2015 Feb; 31():31-6. PubMed ID: 25479237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparative in vitro activities of ertapenem (MK-0826) against 469 less frequently identified anaerobes isolated from human infections.
Goldstein EJ; Citron DM; Merriam CV; Warren YA; Tyrrell KL; Fernandez H
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2002 Apr; 46(4):1136-40. PubMed ID: 11897608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The pharmacokinetic properties of cefotetan and its relevance for prophylaxis in elective colorectal surgery.
Kujath P; Düsel W; Bruch HP; Kees F
Chemioterapia; 1988 Aug; 7(4):229-32. PubMed ID: 3180301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. General microbiology and in vitro susceptibility of anaerobes isolated from complicated skin and skin-structure infections in patients enrolled in a comparative trial of ertapenem versus piperacillin-tazobactam.
Goldstein EJ; Citron DM; Merriam CV; Warren Y; Tyrrell KL; Gesser RM
Clin Infect Dis; 2002 Sep; 35(Suppl 1):S119-25. PubMed ID: 12173120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Use of cephalosporins for prophylaxis and therapy of polymicrobial infection in mice.
Brook I
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1993 Jul; 37(7):1531-5. PubMed ID: 8363386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Antimicrobial susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria in New Zealand: 1999-2003.
Roberts SA; Shore KP; Paviour SD; Holland D; Morris AJ
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2006 May; 57(5):992-8. PubMed ID: 16507560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Multicentre survey of the in-vitro activity of seven antimicrobial agents, including ertapenem, against recently isolated Gram-negative anaerobic bacteria in Greece.
Papaparaskevas J; Pantazatou A; Katsandri A; Legakis NJ; Avlamis A;
Clin Microbiol Infect; 2005 Oct; 11(10):820-4. PubMed ID: 16153256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Oral versus systemic antibiotic prophylaxis in elective colon surgery: a randomized study and meta-analysis send a message from the 1990s.
Lewis RT
Can J Surg; 2002 Jun; 45(3):173-80. PubMed ID: 12067168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Cefotetan compared with gentamicin and tinidazole in acute abdominal surgery.
Tanner AG; Thom BT; Strachan CJ
J Hosp Infect; 1986 Jan; 7(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 2870109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Antimicrobial chemoprophylaxis in colorectal surgery.
Tonelli F
Chemioterapia; 1988 Aug; 7(4):223-8. PubMed ID: 3180300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparative in vitro activity of ertapenem and 11 other antimicrobial agents against aerobic and anaerobic pathogens isolated from skin and soft tissue animal and human bite wound infections.
Goldstein EJ; Citron DM; Merriam CV; Warren YA; Tyrrell K; Fernandez H
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2001 Nov; 48(5):641-51. PubMed ID: 11679553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A prospective comparative study of cefotetan versus cefoxitin against infection in elective colorectal surgery.
Basoli A; Schietroma M; Fiocca F; Vigliardi G; Speranza V
J Chemother; 1989 Jul; 1(4 Suppl):999-1001. PubMed ID: 16312742
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. [Metronidazole and neomycin in wound infection prophylaxis in colon and rectal surgery].
Nowak W; Erbe HJ
Nahrung; 1984; 28(6-7):685-7. PubMed ID: 6493326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Single-dose prophylaxis with cefotetan in elective abdominal surgery. A controlled trial.
Gruwez JA; Lerut J; Christiaens MR; De Roose J; Vernimmen L; Hendrickx J; Trimpeneers F; Schroé H; Deruyter M; Williams KJ
Chemioterapia; 1988 Aug; 7(4):218-22. PubMed ID: 3180299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A randomized prospective study to compare cefotetan with cefuroxime plus metronidazole as prophylaxis in elective colorectal surgery.
Skipper D; Karran SJ
J Hosp Infect; 1992 May; 21(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 1351498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Cefotetan versus conventional triple antibiotic prophylaxis in elective colorectal cancer surgery.
Jeong WK; Park JW; Lim SB; Choi HS; Jeong SY
J Korean Med Sci; 2010 Mar; 25(3):429-34. PubMed ID: 20191043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
