These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19226309)

  • 21. Target probability affects the likelihood that a P300 will be generated in response to a target stimulus, but not its amplitude.
    Bonala B; Boutros NN; Jansen BH
    Psychophysiology; 2008 Jan; 45(1):93-9. PubMed ID: 17971059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Microsaccadic responses in a bimodal oddball task.
    Valsecchi M; Turatto M
    Psychol Res; 2009 Jan; 73(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 18320216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Microsaccadic response during inhibition of return in a target-target paradigm.
    Betta E; Galfano G; Turatto M
    Vision Res; 2007 Feb; 47(3):428-36. PubMed ID: 17087989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Changes in P300 amplitude during an active standard auditory oddball task.
    Lindín M; Zurrón M; Díaz F
    Biol Psychol; 2004 Apr; 66(2):153-67. PubMed ID: 15041137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Electrophysiological correlates of presaccadic remapping in humans.
    Parks NA; Corballis PM
    Psychophysiology; 2008 Sep; 45(5):776-83. PubMed ID: 18513363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Differential effects of the stimulus sequence on CNV and P300.
    Stadler W; Klimesch W; Pouthas V; Ragot R
    Brain Res; 2006 Dec; 1123(1):157-67. PubMed ID: 17081506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Personality modulation of P300 wave recorded within an emotional oddball protocol.
    Mardaga S; Hansenne M
    Neurophysiol Clin; 2009 Feb; 39(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 19268846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Surprise, surprise: two distinct components in the visually evoked distractor effect.
    Graupner ST; Velichkovsky BM; Pannasch S; Marx J
    Psychophysiology; 2007 Mar; 44(2):251-61. PubMed ID: 17343709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. N200-speller using motion-onset visual response.
    Hong B; Guo F; Liu T; Gao X; Gao S
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Sep; 120(9):1658-66. PubMed ID: 19640783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Introduction to Special Thematic Issue, part 2 "Microsaccades: Empirical Research and Methodological Advances".
    Groner R
    J Eye Mov Res; 2020; 13(5):. PubMed ID: 38894732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Model comparison for automatic characterization and classification of average ERPs using visual oddball paradigm.
    Merzagora AC; Butti M; Polikar R; Izzetoglu M; Bunce S; Cerutti S; Bianchi AM; Onaral B
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Feb; 120(2):264-74. PubMed ID: 19062338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Relationship of P300 single-trial responses with reaction time and preceding stimulus sequence.
    Holm A; Ranta-aho PO; Sallinen M; Karjalainen PA; Müller K
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug; 61(2):244-52. PubMed ID: 16364479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An auditory oddball (P300) spelling system for brain-computer interfaces.
    Furdea A; Halder S; Krusienski DJ; Bross D; Nijboer F; Birbaumer N; Kübler A
    Psychophysiology; 2009 May; 46(3):617-25. PubMed ID: 19170946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Greater sensitivity of the P300 component to bimodal stimulation in an event-related potentials oddball task.
    Campanella S; Delle-Vigne D; Kornreich C; Verbanck P
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 May; 123(5):937-46. PubMed ID: 22119176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reduced P300 amplitude in a visual recognition task in patients with schizophrenia.
    Vianin P; Posada A; Hugues E; Franck N; Bovet P; Parnas J; Jeannerod M
    Neuroimage; 2002 Oct; 17(2):911-21. PubMed ID: 12377165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Stimulus intensity affects the latency but not the amplitude of the N2pc.
    Brisson B; Robitaille N; Jolicoeur P
    Neuroreport; 2007 Oct; 18(15):1627-30. PubMed ID: 17885614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Visual p300 effects beyond symptoms in concussed college athletes.
    Lavoie ME; Dupuis F; Johnston KM; Leclerc S; Lassonde M
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2004 Feb; 26(1):55-73. PubMed ID: 14972694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effects of memory scanning on the late Nd and P300: an interference study.
    Singhal A; Fowler B
    Psychophysiology; 2005 Mar; 42(2):142-50. PubMed ID: 15787851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Exogenous and endogenous orienting of visuospatial attention in P300-guided brain computer interfaces: a pilot study on healthy participants.
    Marchetti M; Piccione F; Silvoni S; Priftis K
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 Apr; 123(4):774-9. PubMed ID: 21903462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Electrophysiological correlates of detecting a visual target and detecting its absence: the role of feature dimensions.
    Akyürek EG; Dinkelbach A; Schubö A; Müller HJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Sep; 48(11):3365-70. PubMed ID: 20633570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.