486 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19226533)
1. The survival outcome and prognostic factors for middle and distal bile duct cancer following surgical resection.
Choi SB; Park SW; Kim KS; Choi JS; Lee WJ
J Surg Oncol; 2009 May; 99(6):335-42. PubMed ID: 19226533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The prognosis and survival outcome of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma following surgical resection: association of lymph node metastasis and lymph node dissection with survival.
Choi SB; Kim KS; Choi JY; Park SW; Choi JS; Lee WJ; Chung JB
Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Nov; 16(11):3048-56. PubMed ID: 19626372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Significance of positive ductal margin and prognostic factors of surgical resection in middle and distal bile duct carcinoma].
Liang JW; Zhao P; Zhou ZX; Tian YT; Zhao DB; Wang CF
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 May; 47(9):677-80. PubMed ID: 19615237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prognostic factors for radical resection of middle and distal bile duct cancer.
Nomura T; Tsuchiya Y; Nashimoto A; Yabusaki H; Takii Y; Nakagawa S; Sato N; Kanbayashi C; Tanaka O
Hepatogastroenterology; 2009; 56(90):294-8. PubMed ID: 19579585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes is an independent prognostic factor for patients with resectable middle and distal bile duct carcinoma.
Kawai M; Tani M; Kobayashi Y; Tsuji T; Tabuse K; Horiuchi T; Oka M; Yamaguchi K; Sakata Y; Shimomura T; Yamaue H
Am J Surg; 2010 Apr; 199(4):447-52. PubMed ID: 19596119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prognostic significance of lymph node metastasis and surgical margin status for distal cholangiocarcinoma.
Murakami Y; Uemura K; Hayashidani Y; Sudo T; Hashimoto Y; Ohge H; Sueda T
J Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 95(3):207-12. PubMed ID: 17278119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Carcinoma of the distal and middle bile duct: surgical results, prognostic factors, and long-term follow-up.
Bahra M; Jacob D; Langrehr JM; Neumann UP; Neuhaus P
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg; 2008; 15(5):501-7. PubMed ID: 18836804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prognostic factors of surgical resection in middle and distal bile duct cancer: an analysis of 55 patients concerning the significance of ductal and radial margins.
Sakamoto Y; Kosuge T; Shimada K; Sano T; Ojima H; Yamamoto J; Yamasaki S; Takayama T; Makuuchi M
Surgery; 2005 Apr; 137(4):396-402. PubMed ID: 15800484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prognostic relevance of lymph node ratio and number of resected nodes after curative resection of ampulla of Vater carcinoma.
Falconi M; Crippa S; Domínguez I; Barugola G; Capelli P; Marcucci S; Beghelli S; Scarpa A; Bassi C; Pederzoli P
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Nov; 15(11):3178-86. PubMed ID: 18712568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Treatment strategy for patients with middle and lower third bile duct cancer.
Todoroki T; Kawamoto T; Koike N; Fukao K; Shoda J; Takahashi H
Br J Surg; 2001 Mar; 88(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 11260100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Operations for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: single-institution experience of 158 patients.
Lang H; Sotiropoulos GC; Sgourakis G; Schmitz KJ; Paul A; Hilgard P; Zöpf T; Trarbach T; Malagó M; Baba HA; Broelsch CE
J Am Coll Surg; 2009 Feb; 208(2):218-28. PubMed ID: 19228533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Liver metastases after curative resection in patients with distal bile duct cancer.
Takao S; Shinchi H; Uchikura K; Kubo M; Aikou T
Br J Surg; 1999 Mar; 86(3):327-31. PubMed ID: 10201773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Surgical treatment of mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: an 11-year Western single-center experience in 107 patients.
Yedibela S; Demir R; Zhang W; Meyer T; Hohenberger W; Schönleben F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Feb; 16(2):404-12. PubMed ID: 19037702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Prognostic analysis of patients suffering from distal bile duct cancer].
Sun LC; Zhang BH; Zhang YJ; Jiang XQ; Zhang BH; Yi B; Yu WL; Wu MC
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2004 May; 42(9):528-31. PubMed ID: 15196364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multivariate analysis by Cox Proportional Hazards Model on prognoses of patients with bile duct carcinoma after resection.
He P; Shi J; Chen W; Wang Z
Chin Med J (Engl); 2002 Oct; 115(10):1538-41. PubMed ID: 12490105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Actual long-term outcome of Klatskin's tumor after surgical resection.
Han SS; Jang JY; Lee KU; Kim SW
Hepatogastroenterology; 2008; 55(88):1986-92. PubMed ID: 19260464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patterns and relevant factors of tumor recurrence for extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma after radical resection.
Park SW; Park YS; Chung JB; Kang JK; Kim KS; Choi JS; Lee WJ; Kim BR; Song SY
Hepatogastroenterology; 2004; 51(60):1612-8. PubMed ID: 15532789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Surgical management of hilar bile duct cancer. Preoperative diagnosis, selection of treatment options and clinical outcome.
Hirai I; Kimura W; Fuse A; Suto K; Sakurai F; Ishiyama S
Hepatogastroenterology; 2003; 50(51):629-35. PubMed ID: 12828048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The experiences of hilar skeletonization for the treatment of locally advanced proximal bile duct cancer.
Kim MW; Kim WH; Wang HJ; Chung JB; Chun M
Hepatogastroenterology; 2001; 48(41):1298-301. PubMed ID: 11677950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Number of lymph node metastases: a significant prognostic factor for patients with radical resection of carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater].
Liu N; Liang H; Zhang RP; Pan Y; Liu Y; Deng JY; Wang XN; Ding XW; Hao XS
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Jul; 10(4):350-2. PubMed ID: 17659460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
