378 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19226825)
1. Direct and indirect drift assessment means. Part 2: wind tunnel experiments.
Nuyttens D; De Schampheleire M; Baetens K; Sonck B
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):757-61. PubMed ID: 19226825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Direct and indirect drift assessment means. Part 4: a comparative study.
Nuyttens D; Baetens K; De Schampheleire M; Sonck B
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):769-74. PubMed ID: 19226827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Direct and indirect drift assessment means. Part 3: field drift experiments.
Nuyttens D; De Schampheleire M; Baetens K; Dekeyser D; Sonck B
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):763-7. PubMed ID: 19226826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Direct and indirect drift assessment means. Part 1: PDPA laser based droplet characterisation.
Nuyttens D; Baetens K; De Schampheleire M; Dekeyser D; Sonck B
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):749-56. PubMed ID: 19226824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Classification of spray nozzles based on droplet size distributions and wind tunnel tests.
De Schamphelerie M; Spanoghe P; Nuyttens D; Baetens K; Cornelis W; Gabriels D; Van der Meeren P
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2006; 71(2 Pt A):201-7. PubMed ID: 17390794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of the entrained air and initial droplet velocity on the release height parameter of a Gaussian spray drift model.
Stainier C; Destain MF; Schiffers B; Lebeau F
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2006; 71(2 Pt A):197-200. PubMed ID: 17390793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of collectors of airborne spray drift. Experiments in a wind tunnel and field measurements.
Arvidsson T; Bergström L; Kreuger J
Pest Manag Sci; 2011 Jun; 67(6):725-33. PubMed ID: 21445941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Off-target loss in ornamental nurseries with different spray techniques.
Zhu H; Derksen RC; Krause CR; Zondag RH
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2009; 74(1):25-36. PubMed ID: 20218508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of air support on droplet characteristics and spray drift.
Nuyttens D; Dekeyser D; De Schampheleire M; Baetens K; Sonck B
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2007; 72(2):71-9. PubMed ID: 18399426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Spray drift as affected by meteorological conditions.
Nuyttens D; Sonck B; de Schampheleire M; Steurbaut W; Baetens K; Verboven P; Nicolaï B; Ramon H
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2005; 70(4):947-59. PubMed ID: 16628942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A pdpa laser-based measuring set-up for the characterisation of spray nozzles.
Nuyttens D; Sonck B; de Schampheleire M; Steurbaut W; Baetens K; Verboven P; Nicolaï B; Ramon H
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2005; 70(4):1023-35. PubMed ID: 16628951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. DRIFT POTENTIAL OF TILTED SHIELDED ROTARY ATOMISERS BASED ON WIND TUNNEL MEASUREMENTS.
Salah SO; Massinon M; De Cock N; Schiffers B; Lebeau F
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2015; 80(3):303-12. PubMed ID: 27141728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Optimization of the spray application technology in bay laurel (Laurus nobilis).
Nuyttens D; Braekman P; Foque D
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2009; 74(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 20218514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Drift-reducing nozzles and their biological efficacy.
Nuyttens D; Dhoop M; De Blauwer V; Hermann O; Hubrechts W; Mestdagh I; Dekeyser D
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2009; 74(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 20218510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimisation of sequence and orientation for used nozzles based on few, full boom distribution measurements.
Maertens W; Nuyttens D; Sonck B
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2005; 70(4):989-95. PubMed ID: 16628947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of realtime spray drift using RTDrift Gaussian advection-diffusion model.
Lebeau F; Verstraete A; Schiffers B; Destain MF
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2009; 74(1):11-24. PubMed ID: 20218507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative study of anti-drift nozzles' wear.
Bolly G; Huyghebaert B; Mostade O; Oger R
Meded Rijksuniv Gent Fak Landbouwkd Toegep Biol Wet; 2002; 67(2):29-35. PubMed ID: 12701403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Drift studies--comparison of field and wind tunnel experiments.
Stadler R; Regenauer W
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2005; 70(4):971-3. PubMed ID: 16628944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interception of spray drift by border structures. Part 1: wind tunnel experiments.
De Schampheleire M; Nuyttens D; Dekeyser D; Verboven P; Cornelis W; Gabriels D; Spanoghe P
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):719-22. PubMed ID: 19226819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Determining the drift potential of Venturi nozzles compared with standard nozzles across three insecticide spray solutions in a wind tunnel.
Ferguson JC; Chechetto RG; O'Donnell CC; Dorr GJ; Moore JH; Baker GJ; Powis KJ; Hewitt AJ
Pest Manag Sci; 2016 Aug; 72(8):1460-6. PubMed ID: 26732308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
