These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19228392)

  • 1. A novel online Food Recall Checklist for use in an undergraduate student population: a comparison with diet diaries.
    Comrie F; Masson LF; McNeill G
    Nutr J; 2009 Feb; 8():13. PubMed ID: 19228392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relative validity of the pre-coded food diary used in the Danish National Survey of Diet and Physical Activity.
    Knudsen VK; Gille MB; Nielsen TH; Christensen T; Fagt S; Biltoft-Jensen A
    Public Health Nutr; 2011 Dec; 14(12):2110-6. PubMed ID: 21806861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relative validity of an intelligent ordering system to estimate dietary intake among university students from a medical school in Shanghai, China.
    Zhang Y; Gu D; Luo M; Liu S; Peng H; Jia Y
    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2024 Jul; 21(1):70. PubMed ID: 38965619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validity and Usability of a Smartphone Image-Based Dietary Assessment App Compared to 3-Day Food Diaries in Assessing Dietary Intake Among Canadian Adults: Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Ji Y; Plourde H; Bouzo V; Kilgour RD; Cohen TR
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2020 Sep; 8(9):e16953. PubMed ID: 32902389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dietary Intake Reporting Accuracy of the Bridge2U Mobile Application Food Log Compared to Control Meal and Dietary Recall Methods.
    Lemacks JL; Adams K; Lovetere A
    Nutrients; 2019 Jan; 11(1):. PubMed ID: 30669430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of a food frequency questionnaire with an online dietary assessment tool for assessing preschool children's dietary intake.
    Vereecken C; Covents M; Maes L
    J Hum Nutr Diet; 2010 Oct; 23(5):502-10. PubMed ID: 20163509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Mobile Phone Based Method to Assess Energy and Food Intake in Young Children: A Validation Study against the Doubly Labelled Water Method and 24 h Dietary Recalls.
    Delisle Nyström C; Forsum E; Henriksson H; Trolle-Lagerros Y; Larsson C; Maddison R; Timpka T; Löf M
    Nutrients; 2016 Jan; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 26784226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relative Validity of MijnEetmeter: A Food Diary App for Self-Monitoring of Dietary Intake.
    Ocké M; Dinnissen C; Stafleu A; de Vries J; van Rossum C
    Nutrients; 2021 Mar; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 33808209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. First evaluation steps of a new method for dietary intake estimation regarding a list of key food groups in adults and in different sociodemographic and health-related behaviour strata.
    Béjar LM
    Public Health Nutr; 2017 Oct; 20(15):2660-2669. PubMed ID: 28789723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nutritional methods in the European Prospective Investigation of Cancer in Norfolk.
    Bingham SA; Welch AA; McTaggart A; Mulligan AA; Runswick SA; Luben R; Oakes S; Khaw KT; Wareham N; Day NE
    Public Health Nutr; 2001 Jun; 4(3):847-58. PubMed ID: 11415493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of a dietary targets monitor.
    Lean ME; Anderson AS; Morrison C; Currall J
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2003 May; 57(5):667-73. PubMed ID: 12771967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electronic Dietary Intake Assessment (e-DIA): relative validity of a mobile phone application to measure intake of food groups.
    Rangan AM; Tieleman L; Louie JC; Tang LM; Hebden L; Roy R; Kay J; Allman-Farinelli M
    Br J Nutr; 2016 Jun; 115(12):2219-26. PubMed ID: 27121045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Single-Meal Nutrient Assessment by a Self-Administered, Electronic Exit Survey Compared with a Multipass Dietary Interview in University Undergraduates in an All-You-Care-to-Eat Campus Dining Hall.
    Slavin M; Polasky A; Vieyra K; Best A; Durant L; Frankenfeld C
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2019 May; 119(5):739-749. PubMed ID: 31029234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Geographic and socioeconomic diversity of food and nutrient intakes: a comparison of four European countries.
    Mertens E; Kuijsten A; Dofková M; Mistura L; D'Addezio L; Turrini A; Dubuisson C; Favret S; Havard S; Trolle E; Van't Veer P; Geleijnse JM
    Eur J Nutr; 2019 Jun; 58(4):1475-1493. PubMed ID: 29594476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimum Dietary Diversity for Women of Reproductive Age (MDD-W) Data Collection: Validity of the List-Based and Open Recall Methods as Compared to Weighed Food Record.
    Hanley-Cook GT; Tung JYA; Sattamini IF; Marinda PA; Thong K; Zerfu D; Kolsteren PW; Tuazon MAG; Lachat CK
    Nutrients; 2020 Jul; 12(7):. PubMed ID: 32659995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating the Validity of a Food Frequency Questionnaire in Comparison with a 7-Day Dietary Record for Measuring Dietary Intake in a Population of Survivors of Colorectal Cancer.
    Koole JL; Bours MJL; Breedveld-Peters JJL; van Roekel EH; van Dongen MCJM; Eussen SJPM; van Zutphen M; van Duijnhoven FJB; Boshuizen HC; Weijenberg MP
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2020 Feb; 120(2):245-257. PubMed ID: 31806573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Development, Validation, and User Evaluation of Foodbook24: A Web-Based Dietary Assessment Tool Developed for the Irish Adult Population.
    Timon CM; Blain RJ; McNulty B; Kehoe L; Evans K; Walton J; Flynn A; Gibney ER
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 May; 19(5):e158. PubMed ID: 28495662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Agreement between an online dietary assessment tool (myfood24) and an interviewer-administered 24-h dietary recall in British adolescents aged 11-18 years.
    Albar SA; Alwan NA; Evans CE; Greenwood DC; Cade JE
    Br J Nutr; 2016 May; 115(9):1678-86. PubMed ID: 26975650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Feasibility of an estimated method using graduated utensils to estimate food portion size in infants aged 4 to 18 months.
    Bradley J; West-Sadler S; Foster E; Sommerville J; Allen R; Stephen AM; Adamson AJ
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(6):e0197591. PubMed ID: 29879140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A 24-h recall does not provide a valid estimate of absolute nutrient intakes for rural women in southern Ethiopia.
    Alemayehu AA; Abebe Y; Gibson RS
    Nutrition; 2011 Sep; 27(9):919-24. PubMed ID: 21295444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.