BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19228648)

  • 1. Evaluation of effectiveness of a computerized notification system for reporting critical values.
    Piva E; Sciacovelli L; Zaninotto M; Laposata M; Plebani M
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2009 Mar; 131(3):432-41. PubMed ID: 19228648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An audit on the reporting of critical results in a tertiary institute.
    Rensburg MA; Nutt L; Zemlin AE; Erasmus RT
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2009 Mar; 46(Pt 2):162-4. PubMed ID: 19225027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interpretative reports and critical values.
    Piva E; Plebani M
    Clin Chim Acta; 2009 Jun; 404(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 19306860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of laboratory critical value reporting at a large academic medical center.
    Dighe AS; Rao A; Coakley AB; Lewandrowski KB
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 May; 125(5):758-64. PubMed ID: 16707379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Meeting regulatory requirements by the use of cell phone text message notification with autoescalation and loop closure for reporting of critical laboratory results.
    Saw S; Loh TP; Ang SB; Yip JW; Sethi SK
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2011 Jul; 136(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 21685029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Critical values in pediatric surgical pathology: definition, implementation, and reporting in a children's hospital.
    Coffin CM; Spilker K; Lowichik A; Zhou H; Nielson K; Erickson L; Pysher TJ
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2007 Dec; 128(6):1035-40. PubMed ID: 18024330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Studying critical values: adverse event identification following a critical laboratory values study at the ohio state university medical center.
    Jenkins JJ; Mac Crawford J; Bissell MG
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2007 Oct; 128(4):604-9. PubMed ID: 17875512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Error rates in Australian chemical pathology laboratories.
    Khoury M; Burnett L; Mackay MA
    Med J Aust; 1996 Aug; 165(3):128-30. PubMed ID: 8709873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Laboratory results. Timeliness as a quality attribute and strategy.
    Howanitz JH; Howanitz PJ
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2001 Sep; 116(3):311-5. PubMed ID: 11554156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality assurance indicators in anatomic pathology.
    Travers H
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1990 Nov; 114(11):1149-56. PubMed ID: 2241526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Laboratory clinical effectiveness: pathologists improving clinical outcomes.
    Schuerch C; Selna M; Jones J
    Clin Lab Med; 2008 Jun; 28(2):223-44, vi. PubMed ID: 18436068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Application of a rules-based natural language parser to critical value reporting in anatomic pathology.
    Owens SR; Balis UG; Lucas DR; Myers JL
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2012 Mar; 36(3):376-80. PubMed ID: 22343338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Critical limits (alert values) for physician notification: universal or medical center specific limits?
    Lum G
    Ann Clin Lab Sci; 1998; 28(5):261-71. PubMed ID: 9784826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Critical decisions in the clinical laboratory.
    Oxley DK
    Pathologist; 1980 Sep; 34(9):458-60. PubMed ID: 10248145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Laboratory critical values: automated notification supports effective clinical decision making.
    Piva E; Pelloso M; Penello L; Plebani M
    Clin Biochem; 2014 Sep; 47(13-14):1163-8. PubMed ID: 24886769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Should we customise critical value procedure according to patient origin and laboratory turnaround time?
    Salinas M; López-Garrigós M; Gutiérrez M; Lugo J; Flors L; Leiva-Salinas C
    J Clin Pathol; 2013 Apr; 66(4):269-72. PubMed ID: 23372177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Procedure for accurate evaluation of laboratory data and its international trends].
    Kuwa K
    Rinsho Byori; 2005 Jun; 53(6):531-9. PubMed ID: 16026081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Critical lab value reporting more challenging in ED.
    ED Manag; 2007 May; 19(5):55-6. PubMed ID: 17518146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A national survey on pediatric critical values used in clinical laboratories across Canada.
    Gong Y; Adeli K;
    Clin Biochem; 2009 Nov; 42(16-17):1610-5. PubMed ID: 19683519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving patient safety by repeating (read-back) telephone reports of critical information.
    Barenfanger J; Sautter RL; Lang DL; Collins SM; Hacek DM; Peterson LR
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2004 Jun; 121(6):801-3. PubMed ID: 15198350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.