These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19228648)

  • 21. Laboratory accreditation and inspection.
    Rauch CA; Nichols JH
    Clin Lab Med; 2007 Dec; 27(4):845-58, vii. PubMed ID: 17950901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Implementation of a quality system in a therapeutic drug monitoring laboratory.
    Gaillard-France S; Boulieu R
    Therapie; 1999; 54(3):315-20. PubMed ID: 10500444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Computers, quality, and the clinical laboratory: a look at critical value reporting.
    Tate KE; Gardner RM
    Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care; 1993; ():193-7. PubMed ID: 8130460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Proactive authenticated notifications for health practitioners: two way human computer interaction through phone.
    Majeed RW; Stöhr MR; Röhrig R
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 180():388-92. PubMed ID: 22874218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Closing the clinical laboratory testing loop with information technology.
    Connelly DP; Willard KE; Hallgren JH; Sielaff BH
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1996 Apr; 105(4 Suppl 1):S40-7. PubMed ID: 8607461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. National survey on critical values reporting in a cohort of Italian laboratories.
    Lippi G; Giavarina D; Montagnana M; Luca Salvagno G; Cappelletti P; Plebani M; Guidi GC; ; ; ;
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2007; 45(10):1411-3. PubMed ID: 17924852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Pathology Laboratory Act 2007 explained.
    Looi LM
    Malays J Pathol; 2008 Jun; 30(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 19108405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Quality assurance goals in clinical pathology.
    Schifman RB
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1990 Nov; 114(11):1140-4. PubMed ID: 2241524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Improving quality of electronic data registration for clinical pathways at the regional hospital Sint Augustinus Antwerp (Flanders-Belgium): A case study.
    Van der Mussele H; De Sitter J; Van Looy L
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 122():587-90. PubMed ID: 17102328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Utility of repeat testing of critical values: a Q-probes analysis of 86 clinical laboratories.
    Lehman CM; Howanitz PJ; Souers R; Karcher DS
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2014 Jun; 138(6):788-93. PubMed ID: 24878017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Sponsor/contract laboratory communication: a team approach to quality.
    Caulfield M; Franklin W; Muncie JA; Nelson J; Ross T; Russo AS; Schulte MC; Sottolano LA; Vincifora CJ; Pappacena BM
    Qual Assur; 1993; 2(1-2):191-6. PubMed ID: 8156212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Critical diagnoses in surgical pathology: a retrospective single-institution study to monitor guidelines for communication of urgent results.
    Huang EC; Kuo FC; Fletcher CD; Nosé V
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2009 Jul; 33(7):1098-102. PubMed ID: 19390422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The role of 2D bar code and electronic cross-matching in the reduction of misidentification errors in a pathology laboratory. A safety system assisted by the use of information technology.
    Fabbretti G
    Pathologica; 2011 Dec; 103(6):313-7. PubMed ID: 22558887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Assessment monitoring of laboratory critical values: a College of American Pathologists Q-Tracks study of 180 institutions.
    Wagar EA; Stankovic AK; Wilkinson DS; Walsh M; Souers RJ
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2007 Jan; 131(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 17227122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effectiveness of a clinical-decision-support system in improving compliance with cardiac-care quality measures and supporting resident training.
    Riggio JM; Sorokin R; Moxey ED; Mather P; Gould S; Kane GC
    Acad Med; 2009 Dec; 84(12):1719-26. PubMed ID: 19940579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Digital imaging, archiving, and structured reporting in pediatric echocardiography: impact on laboratory efficiency and physician communication.
    Frommelt P; Gorentz J; Deatsman S; Organ D; Frommelt M; Mussatto K
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2008 Aug; 21(8):935-40. PubMed ID: 18396010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Interpretive reporting to improve the effectiveness of clinical laboratory test results. An ECRI technology assessment.
    J Health Care Technol; 1986; 2(4):269-82. PubMed ID: 10317739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Interpretative commenting: a tool for improving the laboratory-clinical interface.
    Plebani M
    Clin Chim Acta; 2009 Jun; 404(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 19298798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. ISO 15189 accreditation: Requirements for quality and competence of medical laboratories, experience of a laboratory I.
    Guzel O; Guner EI
    Clin Biochem; 2009 Mar; 42(4-5):274-8. PubMed ID: 19863920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A summary of deliberations on strategic planning for continuous quality improvement in laboratory medicine.
    Grzybicki DM; Shahangian S; Pollock AM; Raab SS
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2009 Mar; 131(3):315-20. PubMed ID: 19228637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.