121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19229101)
1. Monte Carlo-derived TLD cross-calibration factors for treatment verification and measurement of skin dose in accelerated partial breast irradiation.
Garnica-Garza HM
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Mar; 54(6):1621-31. PubMed ID: 19229101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dosimetry of MammoSite® applicator: comparison between Monte Carlo simulation, measurements, and treatment planning calculation.
Oshaghi M; Sadeghi M; Mahdavi SR; Shirazi A
J Cancer Res Ther; 2013; 9(2):224-9. PubMed ID: 23771363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multichannel dosemeter and Al2O3:C optically stimulated luminescence fibre sensors for use in radiation therapy: evaluation with electron beams.
Magne S; Auger L; Bordy JM; de Carlan L; Isambert A; Bridier A; Ferdinand P; Barthe J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(1):93-9. PubMed ID: 18757901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Uncertainties in personal dosimetry for external radiation: a Monte Carlo approach.
van Dijk JW
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 17052989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Review of MammoSite brachytherapy: advantages, disadvantages and clinical outcomes.
Bensaleh S; Bezak E; Borg M
Acta Oncol; 2009; 48(4):487-94. PubMed ID: 19031175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The determination of beam quality correction factors: Monte Carlo simulations and measurements.
González-Castaño DM; Hartmann GH; Sánchez-Doblado F; Gómez F; Kapsch RP; Pena J; Capote R
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4723-41. PubMed ID: 19622853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Monte Carlo study of a 60Co calibration field of the Dosimetry Laboratory Seibersdorf.
Hranitzky C; Stadtmann H
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):153-6. PubMed ID: 17337744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of doses calculated by the Monte Carlo method and measured by LiF TLD in the buildup region for a 60Co photon beam.
Budanec M; Knezević Z; Bokulić T; Mrcela I; Vrtar M; Vekić B; Kusić Z
Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Dec; 66(12):1925-9. PubMed ID: 18541436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Monte Carlo-based procedure for independent monitor unit calculation in IMRT treatment plans.
Pisaturo O; Moeckli R; Mirimanoff RO; Bochud FO
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jul; 54(13):4299-310. PubMed ID: 19531844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison between PENELOPE and electron Monte Carlo simulations of electron fields used in the treatment of conjunctival lymphoma.
Brualla L; Palanco-Zamora R; Wittig A; Sempau J; Sauerwein W
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Sep; 54(18):5469-81. PubMed ID: 19706962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The use of a Monte Carlo method for uncertainty calculation, with an application to the measurement of neutron ambient dose equivalent rate.
Cox M; Harris P; Nam G; Thomas D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(1):12-23. PubMed ID: 16877469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Simulated and measured Hp(10) response of the personal dosemeter Seibersdorf.
Hranitzky C; Stadtmann H
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):166-9. PubMed ID: 17846027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dosimetric parameters in partial breast irradiation through brachytherapy.
Gloi A; McCourt S; Buchanan R; Goetller A; Zuge C; Balzoa P; Cooley G
Med Dosim; 2009; 34(3):207-13. PubMed ID: 19647630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Calculation of dose distribution in compressible breast tissues using finite element modeling, Monte Carlo simulation and thermoluminescence dosimeters.
Mohammadyari P; Faghihi R; Mosleh-Shirazi MA; Lotfi M; Hematiyan MR; Koontz C; Meigooni AS
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Dec; 60(23):9185-202. PubMed ID: 26572554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Monte Carlo modelling of the treatment line of the Proton Therapy Center in Orsay.
Stankovskiy A; Kerhoas-Cavata S; Ferrand R; Nauraye C; Demarzi L
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Apr; 54(8):2377-94. PubMed ID: 19321923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A preliminary study of in-house Monte Carlo simulations: an integrated Monte Carlo verification system.
Mukumoto N; Tsujii K; Saito S; Yasunaga M; Takegawa H; Yamamoto T; Numasaki H; Teshima T
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Oct; 75(2):571-9. PubMed ID: 19735883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The energy response of a T.P.A. Mk-II ionization chamber using GEANT4 Monte Carlo simulation.
Seneviratne MD; Reinhard MI; Baldock C
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3837-46. PubMed ID: 17664580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Uncertainty reduction in intensity modulated proton therapy by inverse Monte Carlo treatment planning.
Morávek Z; Rickhey M; Hartmann M; Bogner L
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4803-19. PubMed ID: 19622848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of absorbed dose in mammography: monte carlo simulation studies.
Doi K; Chan HP
Radiology; 1980 Apr; 135(1):199-208. PubMed ID: 7360961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Simulating oblique incident irradiation using the BEAMnrc Monte Carlo code.
Downes P; Spezi E
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Apr; 54(7):N93-N100. PubMed ID: 19287082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
