These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19230510)

  • 1. The stay/switch model of concurrent choice.
    MacDonall JS
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2009 Jan; 91(1):21-39. PubMed ID: 19230510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The stay/switch model describes choice among magnitudes of reinforcers.
    MacDonall JS
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jun; 78(2):173-84. PubMed ID: 18406545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Synthesizing concurrent interval performances.
    MacDonall JS
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 Sep; 74(2):189-206. PubMed ID: 11029022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An alternative to the stay/switch equation assessed when using a changeover-delay.
    MacDonall JS
    Behav Processes; 2015 Nov; 120():40-9. PubMed ID: 26299548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Some effects of overall rate of earning reinforcers on run lengths and visit durations.
    Macdonall JS
    Behav Processes; 2006 Jul; 73(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 16530983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Earning and obtaining reinforcers under concurrent interval scheduling.
    MacDonall JS
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Sep; 84(2):167-83. PubMed ID: 16262185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Momentary maximizing and optimal foraging theories of performance on concurrent VR schedules.
    MacDonall JS; Goodell J; Juliano A
    Behav Processes; 2006 Jun; 72(3):283-99. PubMed ID: 16631321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reinforcing staying and switching while using a changeover delay.
    MacDonall JS
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Mar; 79(2):219-32. PubMed ID: 12822688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contingency discriminability and the generalized matching law describe choice on concurrent ratio schedules of wheel-running reinforcement.
    Belke TW
    Behav Processes; 2012 Jul; 90(3):291-301. PubMed ID: 22414348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The generalized matching law as a predictor of choice between cocaine and food in rhesus monkeys.
    Anderson KG; Velkey AJ; Woolverton WL
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2002 Oct; 163(3-4):319-26. PubMed ID: 12373433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are behaviors at one alternative in concurrent schedules independent of contingencies at the other alternative?
    MacDonall JS
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Sep; 108(2):223-235. PubMed ID: 28805988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Matching and conditioned reinforcement rate.
    Shahan TA; Podlesnik CA; Jimenez-Gomez C
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Mar; 85(2):167-80. PubMed ID: 16673824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Every reinforcer counts: reinforcer magnitude and local preference.
    Davison M; Baum WM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Jul; 80(1):95-129. PubMed ID: 13677611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Matching law analysis of rats' alcohol self-administration in a free-operant choice procedure.
    Jimenez-Gomez C; Shahan TA
    Behav Pharmacol; 2008 Jul; 19(4):353-6. PubMed ID: 18622184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Strict and random alternation in concurrent variable-interval schedules.
    Elliffe D; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Jan; 79(1):65-85. PubMed ID: 12696742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Barycentric extension of generalized matching.
    Jensen G; Neuringer A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2009 Sep; 92(2):139-59. PubMed ID: 20354596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fix and sample with rats in the dynamics of choice.
    Aparicio CF; Baum WM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Jul; 86(1):43-63. PubMed ID: 16903492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Steady-state choice between four alternatives obeys the constant-ratio rule.
    Bensemann J; Lobb B; Podlesnik CA; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Jul; 104(1):7-19. PubMed ID: 25989016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Asymmetry of reinforcement and punishment in human choice.
    Rasmussen EB; Newland MC
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2008 Mar; 89(2):157-67. PubMed ID: 18422016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Within-session changes in responding during concurrent schedules with different reinforcers in the components.
    McSweeney FK; Swindell S; Weatherly JN
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1996 Nov; 66(3):369-90. PubMed ID: 8921615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.