180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19230603)
1. Relationship between transglottal pressure and fundamental frequency of phonation--study using a rubber model.
Owaki S; Kataoka H; Shimizu T
J Voice; 2010 Mar; 24(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 19230603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of transglottal pressure on fundamental frequency of phonation: study with a rubber model.
Kataoka H; Kitajima K; Owaki S
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2001 Jan; 110(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 11201810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of length and depth of vibration of the vocal folds on the relationship between transglottal pressure and fundamental frequency of phonation in canine larynges.
Kataoka K; Kitajima K
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2001 Jun; 110(6):556-61. PubMed ID: 11407847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Relationship between transglottal pressure and fundamental frequency of phonation, with effects of dehydration produced by atropine, in healthy volunteers.
Tanaka K; Kitajima K; Tanaka H
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2001 Nov; 110(11):1066-71. PubMed ID: 11713920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of cricothyroid muscle action on the relation between subglottal pressure and fundamental frequency in an in vivo canine model.
Hsiao TY; Liu CM; Luschei ES; Titze IR
J Voice; 2001 Jun; 15(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 11411473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Influence of transglottal pressure on vocal fundamental frequency changes with stiffness of vocal folds].
Tanaka K; Kitajima K; Kataoka H; Kataoka K; Tanaka H
Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1997 Jan; 100(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 9038069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computer-aided technique for automatic determination of the relationship between transglottal pressure change and voice fundamental frequency.
Deguchi S; Kawashima K; Washio S
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2008 Dec; 117(12):876-80. PubMed ID: 19140531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of artificially lengthened vocal tract on vocal fold oscillation's fundamental frequency.
Hanamitsu M; Kataoka H
J Voice; 2004 Jun; 18(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 15193649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of subglottic pressure on fundamental frequency of the canine larynx with active muscle tensions.
Hsiao TY; Solomon NP; Luschei ES; Titze IR; Liu K; Fu TC; Hsu MM
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1994 Oct; 103(10):817-21. PubMed ID: 7944175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Simulated effects of cricothyroid and thyroarytenoid muscle activation on adult-male vocal fold vibration.
Lowell SY; Story BH
J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jul; 120(1):386-97. PubMed ID: 16875234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Vibration in a self-oscillating vocal fold model with left-right asymmetry in body-layer stiffness.
Zhang Z
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Nov; 128(5):EL279-85. PubMed ID: 21110539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of transglottal pressure change on fundamental frequency of phonation: preliminary evaluation of the effect of intraoral pressure change.
Tanaka K; Kitajima K; Kataoka H
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 1997; 49(6):300-7. PubMed ID: 9415735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The pitch rise paradigm: a new task for real-time endoscopy of non-stationary phonation.
Rasp O; Lohscheller J; Doellinger M; Eysholdt U; Hoppe U
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2006; 58(3):175-85. PubMed ID: 16636565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Indirect assessment of the contribution of subglottal air pressure and vocal-fold tension to changes of fundamental frequency in English.
Monsen RB; Engebretson AM; Vemula NR
J Acoust Soc Am; 1978 Jul; 64(1):65-80. PubMed ID: 712003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interactions of subglottal pressure and neuromuscular activation on fundamental frequency and intensity.
Chhetri DK; Park SJ
Laryngoscope; 2016 May; 126(5):1123-30. PubMed ID: 26971707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. On pressure-frequency relations in the excised larynx.
Alipour F; Scherer RC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2296-305. PubMed ID: 17902865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rules for controlling low-dimensional vocal fold models with muscle activation.
Titze IR; Story BH
J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Sep; 112(3 Pt 1):1064-76. PubMed ID: 12243155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Restraining mechanisms in regulating glottal closure during phonation.
Zhang Z
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Dec; 130(6):4010-9. PubMed ID: 22225055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of acceleration and impact stress as possible loading factors in phonation: a computer modeling study.
Horácek J; Laukkanen AM; Sidlof P; Murphy P; Svec JG
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2009; 61(3):137-45. PubMed ID: 19571548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nonstimulated rabbit phonation model: Cricothyroid approximation.
Novaleski CK; Kojima T; Chang S; Luo H; Valenzuela CV; Rousseau B
Laryngoscope; 2016 Jul; 126(7):1589-94. PubMed ID: 26971861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
