These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19230610)

  • 1. Estimating risk difference from relative association measures in meta-analysis can infrequently pose interpretational challenges.
    Murad MH; Montori VM; Walter SD; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Aug; 62(8):865-7. PubMed ID: 19230610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution on respiratory and cardiovascular mortality in the Netherlands: the NLCS-AIR study.
    Brunekreef B; Beelen R; Hoek G; Schouten L; Bausch-Goldbohm S; Fischer P; Armstrong B; Hughes E; Jerrett M; van den Brandt P
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 Mar; (139):5-71; discussion 73-89. PubMed ID: 19554969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Issues in the selection of a summary statistic for meta-analysis of clinical trials with binary outcomes.
    Deeks JJ
    Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(11):1575-600. PubMed ID: 12111921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. One relative risk versus two odds ratios: implications for meta-analyses involving paired and unpaired binary data.
    Zou GY
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 17327243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relative risks and confidence intervals were easily computed indirectly from multivariable logistic regression.
    Localio AR; Margolis DJ; Berlin JA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Sep; 60(9):874-82. PubMed ID: 17689803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Empirical comparison of subgroup effects in conventional and individual patient data meta-analyses.
    Koopman L; van der Heijden GJ; Hoes AW; Grobbee DE; Rovers MM
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(3):358-61. PubMed ID: 18601805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Why add anything to nothing? The arcsine difference as a measure of treatment effect in meta-analysis with zero cells.
    Rücker G; Schwarzer G; Carpenter J; Olkin I
    Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(5):721-38. PubMed ID: 19072749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relative-risk ratio was a useful measure of differential association in cohort and case-series studies.
    Hocine MN; Tubert-Bitter P; Moreau T; Chavance M; Varon E; Guillemot D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Apr; 60(4):361-5. PubMed ID: 17346610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of three different models for estimating relative risk in meta-analysis of clinical trials under unobserved heterogeneity.
    Kuhnert R; Böhning D
    Stat Med; 2007 May; 26(11):2277-96. PubMed ID: 16991109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Meta-analysis of repeated measures study designs.
    Peters JL; Mengersen KL
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):941-50. PubMed ID: 19018929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A method for the meta-analysis of mutually exclusive binary outcomes.
    Trikalinos TA; Olkin I
    Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(21):4279-300. PubMed ID: 18416445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A simulation study comparing properties of heterogeneity measures in meta-analyses.
    Mittlböck M; Heinzl H
    Stat Med; 2006 Dec; 25(24):4321-33. PubMed ID: 16991104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The conditional relative odds ratio provided less biased results for comparing diagnostic test accuracy in meta-analyses.
    Suzuki S; Moro-oka T; Choudhry NK
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 May; 57(5):461-9. PubMed ID: 15196616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Facilitating meta-analyses by deriving relative effect and precision estimates for alternative comparisons from a set of estimates presented by exposure level or disease category.
    Hamling J; Lee P; Weitkunat R; Ambühl M
    Stat Med; 2008 Mar; 27(7):954-70. PubMed ID: 17676579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robust meta-analytic conclusions mandate the provision of prediction intervals in meta-analysis summaries.
    Graham PL; Moran JL
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 May; 65(5):503-10. PubMed ID: 22265586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing open and laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery.
    Peters MJ; Mukhtar A; Yunus RM; Khan S; Pappalardo J; Memon B; Memon MA
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Jun; 104(6):1548-61; quiz 1547, 1562. PubMed ID: 19491872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Homocysteine as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease in patients treated by dialysis: a meta-analysis.
    Heinz J; Kropf S; Luley C; Dierkes J
    Am J Kidney Dis; 2009 Sep; 54(3):478-89. PubMed ID: 19359080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Meta-analysis of individual patient data versus aggregate data from longitudinal clinical trials.
    Jones AP; Riley RD; Williamson PR; Whitehead A
    Clin Trials; 2009 Feb; 6(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 19254930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Understanding results.
    Breau RH; Dahm P; Fergusson DA; Hatala R
    J Urol; 2009 Mar; 181(3):985-92. PubMed ID: 19150555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interpretation of absolute measures of disease risk in comparative research.
    Replogle WH; Johnson WD
    Fam Med; 2007 Jun; 39(6):432-5. PubMed ID: 17549653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.