These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

479 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19230612)

  • 1. An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies.
    Sampson M; McGowan J; Cogo E; Grimshaw J; Moher D; Lefebvre C
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Sep; 62(9):944-52. PubMed ID: 19230612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement.
    McGowan J; Sampson M; Salzwedel DM; Cogo E; Foerster V; Lefebvre C
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jul; 75():40-6. PubMed ID: 27005575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Errors in search strategies were identified by type and frequency.
    Sampson M; McGowan J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Oct; 59(10):1057-63. PubMed ID: 16980145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of the peer review of literature search strategies in support of rapid review reports.
    Spry C; Mierzwinski-Urban M
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Dec; 9(4):521-526. PubMed ID: 30408843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Standardization of search methods for guideline development: an international survey of evidence-based guideline development groups.
    Deurenberg R; Vlayen J; Guillo S; Oliver TK; Fervers B; Burgers J;
    Health Info Libr J; 2008 Mar; 25(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 18251909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of the reporting of search strategies in Cochrane systematic reviews.
    Yoshii A; Plaut DA; McGraw KA; Anderson MJ; Wellik KE
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2009 Jan; 97(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 19158999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Heterogeneity in search strategies among Cochrane acupuncture reviews: is there room for improvement?
    Lui S; Smith EJ; Terplan M
    Acupunct Med; 2010 Sep; 28(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 20615852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Identification of problems in search strategies in Cochrane Reviews.
    Franco JVA; Garrote VL; Escobar Liquitay CM; Vietto V
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Sep; 9(3):408-416. PubMed ID: 29761662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Peer review of searches for studies for health technology assessments, systematic reviews, and other evidence syntheses.
    Lefebvre C; Duffy S
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2021 May; 37(1):e64. PubMed ID: 34024305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension.
    Rathbone J; Carter M; Hoffmann T; Glasziou P
    Syst Rev; 2016 Feb; 5():27. PubMed ID: 26862061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study.
    Bramer WM; Rethlefsen ML; Kleijnen J; Franco OH
    Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 6(1):245. PubMed ID: 29208034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Protocol: a systematic review of studies developing and/or evaluating search strategies to identify prognosis studies.
    Corp N; Jordan JL; Hayden JA; Irvin E; Parker R; Smith A; van der Windt DA
    Syst Rev; 2017 Apr; 6(1):88. PubMed ID: 28427475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of librarian collaboration on otolaryngology systematic review and meta-analysis quality.
    Whitney R; Shih MC; Gordis T; Nguyen SA; Meyer TA; Brennan EA
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2024 Jul; 112(3):261-274. PubMed ID: 39308914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A systematic approach to searching: an efficient and complete method to develop literature searches.
    Bramer WM; de Jonge GB; Rethlefsen ML; Mast F; Kleijnen J
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2018 Oct; 106(4):531-541. PubMed ID: 30271302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Poor reporting and inadequate searches were apparent in systematic reviews of adverse effects.
    Golder S; Loke Y; McIntosh HM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 May; 61(5):440-8. PubMed ID: 18394536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Searching for evidence or approval? A commentary on database search in systematic reviews and alternative information retrieval methodologies.
    Delaney A; Tamás PA
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Mar; 9(1):124-131. PubMed ID: 29106042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Microsoft Excel Approach to Reduce Errors and Increase Efficiency in Systematic Searching.
    Brunskill A
    Med Ref Serv Q; 2020; 39(1):15-26. PubMed ID: 32069194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An evaluation of search and selection methods used in dental systematic reviews published in English.
    Major MP; Major PW; Flores-Mir C
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2006 Sep; 137(9):1252-7. PubMed ID: 16946429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of methodological search filters to identify diagnostic accuracy studies can lead to the omission of relevant studies.
    Leeflang MM; Scholten RJ; Rutjes AW; Reitsma JB; Bossuyt PM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Mar; 59(3):234-40. PubMed ID: 16488353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.