These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19231021)

  • 1. A convenient approach for finite-element-analyses of orthopaedic implants in bone contact: modeling and experimental validation.
    Kluess D; Souffrant R; Mittelmeier W; Wree A; Schmitz KP; Bader R
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2009 Jul; 95(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 19231021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Study of micromotion in modular acetabular components during gait and subluxation: a finite element investigation.
    Amirouche F; Romero F; Gonzalez M; Aram L
    J Biomech Eng; 2008 Apr; 130(2):021002. PubMed ID: 18412489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Subject specific finite element analysis of implant stability for a cementless femoral stem.
    Pettersen SH; Wik TS; Skallerud B
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Jul; 24(6):480-7. PubMed ID: 19368993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patient-specific finite element modeling of bones.
    Poelert S; Valstar E; Weinans H; Zadpoor AA
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 Apr; 227(4):464-78. PubMed ID: 23637222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stress analysis of the interface between cervical vertebrae end plates and the Bryan, Prestige LP, and ProDisc-C cervical disc prostheses: an in vivo image-based finite element study.
    Lin CY; Kang H; Rouleau JP; Hollister SJ; Marca FL
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul; 34(15):1554-60. PubMed ID: 19564765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [A biomechanical study of the mechanical stress transmission of dental implants using finite element analysis. Review of literature. Part I].
    Szucs A; Divinyi T; Lorincz A
    Fogorv Sz; 2006 Aug; 99(4):141-7. PubMed ID: 17016921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of muscle forces and gait cycle discretization when assessing acetabular cup primary stability: A finite element study.
    Fallahnezhad K; O'Rourke D; Bahl JS; Thewlis D; Taylor M
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2023 Mar; 230():107351. PubMed ID: 36709556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Experimental validation of a finite element model of a human cadaveric tibia.
    Gray HA; Taddei F; Zavatsky AB; Cristofolini L; Gill HS
    J Biomech Eng; 2008 Jun; 130(3):031016. PubMed ID: 18532865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three-dimensional finite element modeling of ligaments: technical aspects.
    Weiss JA; Gardiner JC; Ellis BJ; Lujan TJ; Phatak NS
    Med Eng Phys; 2005 Dec; 27(10):845-61. PubMed ID: 16085446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Subject-specific finite element models implementing a maximum principal strain criterion are able to estimate failure risk and fracture location on human femurs tested in vitro.
    Schileo E; Taddei F; Cristofolini L; Viceconti M
    J Biomech; 2008; 41(2):356-67. PubMed ID: 18022179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three-dimensional reconstruction and modeling of middle ear biomechanics by high-resolution computed tomography and finite element analysis.
    Lee CF; Chen PR; Lee WJ; Chen JH; Liu TC
    Laryngoscope; 2006 May; 116(5):711-6. PubMed ID: 16652076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The finite cell method for bone simulations: verification and validation.
    Ruess M; Tal D; Trabelsi N; Yosibash Z; Rank E
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2012 Mar; 11(3-4):425-37. PubMed ID: 21695444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Simulation of hip fracture in sideways fall using a 3D finite element model of pelvis-femur-soft tissue complex with simplified representation of whole body.
    Majumder S; Roychowdhury A; Pal S
    Med Eng Phys; 2007 Dec; 29(10):1167-78. PubMed ID: 17270483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical effect of constraint in lumbar total disc replacement: a study with finite element analysis.
    Chung SK; Kim YE; Wang KC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(12):1281-6. PubMed ID: 19455003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Finite Element analyses to study periprosthetic bone adaptation.
    Weinans H; Sumner DR
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1997; 40():3-16. PubMed ID: 10173071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Finite element and experimental cortex strains of the intact and implanted tibia.
    Completo A; Fonseca F; Simões JA
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Oct; 129(5):791-7. PubMed ID: 17887906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Techniques for modeling muscle-induced forces in finite element models of skeletal structures.
    Grosse IR; Dumont ER; Coletta C; Tolleson A
    Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2007 Sep; 290(9):1069-88. PubMed ID: 17721980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical effects of a maxillary implant in the augmented sinus: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Huang HL; Fuh LJ; Ko CC; Hsu JT; Chen CC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):455-62. PubMed ID: 19587867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of micro-CT-based finite element analysis to accurately quantify peri-implant bone strains: a validation in rat tibiae.
    Torcasio A; Zhang X; Van Oosterwyck H; Duyck J; van Lenthe GH
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2012 May; 11(5):743-50. PubMed ID: 21898099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.