These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1923144)

  • 1. Are peer review decisions still binding?
    Power JM
    N Y State Dent J; 1991; 57(7):26-7. PubMed ID: 1923144
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Peer review works.
    Benton RM
    N Y State Dent J; 1995 Dec; 61(10):10. PubMed ID: 8602289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The hidden member benefit.
    Nicol GH
    Todays FDA; 2012; 24(1):8-9, 11-3. PubMed ID: 22474921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Expert witness or "hired gun?".
    Aksu MN
    J Am Coll Dent; 1997; 64(2):25-8. PubMed ID: 9270219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peer review where it counts.
    Bryan CS
    J S C Med Assoc; 1989 Apr; 85(4):209-11. PubMed ID: 2709821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Physician peer review. Serving the patient or the physician?
    Cate MJ
    J Leg Med; 1999 Dec; 20(4):479-506. PubMed ID: 10641461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The latest word on confidentiality of peer review.
    Cronan CJ
    J Ky Med Assoc; 1998 Dec; 96(12):491-3. PubMed ID: 9879179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Immunity protections for peer review.
    Wilcox DP
    Tex Med; 1982 May; 78(5):72-3. PubMed ID: 7101208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Resident files and the peer review privilege.
    Weiman DS; Mangiante E
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 2009 Aug; 94(8):16-8. PubMed ID: 19715000
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Disclosure. Dentist must show compelling need to review HIV records.
    AIDS Policy Law; 2007 Jun; 22(11):8. PubMed ID: 17632846
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Peer Review. Can the Board of Medical Practice subpoena your files?
    Mitchell LE; Bunde DP; Struthers MS; Wraspir KL; Moos RE
    Minn Med; 2000 Nov; 83(11):55-6. PubMed ID: 11126484
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Laws vary on use of peer review records in litigation.
    Berliner MC
    Provider; 1987 May; 13(5):44, 46. PubMed ID: 10281935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Protected peer review.
    Cosgrove MJ
    Del Med J; 1988 Jun; 60(6):349. PubMed ID: 3396739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Draconian powers in Health Commissioner Bill.
    N Z Med J; 1993 May; 106(956):suppl 3. PubMed ID: 8341435
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dental malpractice litigation in a nutshell.
    Morris WO
    J Am Coll Dent; 1991; 58(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 2066511
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk management series: even good guys get sued.
    W V Dent J; 1988 Jul; 62(3):suppl 1-42. PubMed ID: 3218219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Liability and immunity of dentists who serve on peer review committees.
    Power JM
    N Y State Dent J; 1981 May; 47(5):251-3. PubMed ID: 6942350
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Liability of peer review participants--a clue to the puzzle.
    Mang HJ
    J La State Med Soc; 1997 Aug; 149(8):279-83. PubMed ID: 9260455
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Washington State Supreme Court protects quality review committee records.
    Ahern ML
    Health Law Vigil; 1984 Mar; 7(6):9-10. PubMed ID: 10265237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Eight ways to avoid patient complaints.
    Asher RS
    N Y State Dent J; 1981 Nov; 47(9):526, 528. PubMed ID: 6946345
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.