533 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19231566)
1. Making an implant-level impression using solid plastic, press-fit, closed-tray impression copings: a clinical report.
Selecman AM; Wicks RA
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Mar; 101(3):158-9. PubMed ID: 19231566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of splint material rigidity in implant impression techniques.
Del Acqua MA; Chavez AM; Castanharo SM; Compagnoni MA; Mollo Fde A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(6):1153-8. PubMed ID: 21197492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of implant impressions with different impression coping types and shapes.
Rashidan N; Alikhasi M; Samadizadeh S; Beyabanaki E; Kharazifard MJ
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 19804420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models.
Choi JH; Lim YJ; Yim SH; Kim CW
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):761-8. PubMed ID: 17974110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of implant impression techniques.
Assif D; Marshak B; Schmidt A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(2):216-22. PubMed ID: 8666454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Developing an optimal emergence profile of the definitive restoration with a modified impression cap technique for ITI solid abutment.
Kuo SB; Hong HH; Tsai TP; Shen YF
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):646-8. PubMed ID: 12488861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Implant cast accuracy as a function of impression techniques and impression material viscosity.
Walker MP; Ries D; Borello B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):669-74. PubMed ID: 18807563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Master cast implant impression: using the open-tray technique.
Briley TF
Dent Implantol Update; 2002 Oct; 13(10):73-80. PubMed ID: 12455316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparative study of the accuracy between plastic and metal impression transfer copings for implant restorations.
Fernandez MA; Paez de Mendoza CY; Platt JA; Levon JA; Hovijitra ST; Nimmo A
J Prosthodont; 2013 Jul; 22(5):367-76. PubMed ID: 23387412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of impression and pouring techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis.
Del'Acqua MA; Arioli-Filho JN; Compagnoni MA; Mollo Fde A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):226-36. PubMed ID: 18548918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Master cast accuracy in single-tooth implant replacement cases: an in vitro comparison. A technical note.
Vigolo P; Fonzi F; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(3):455-60. PubMed ID: 15973958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of 2 impression techniques for ITI implants.
Akça K; Cehreli MC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(4):517-23. PubMed ID: 15346748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A clinical report on the use of closed-tray, hex-lock-friction-fit implant impression copings.
Raviv E; Hanna J; Raviv R; Harel-Raviv M
J Oral Implantol; 2014 Aug; 40(4):449-53. PubMed ID: 25106009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of implant angulation, connection length, and impression material on the dimensional accuracy of implant impressions: an in vitro comparative study.
Sorrentino R; Gherlone EF; Calesini G; Zarone F
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 May; 12 Suppl 1():e63-76. PubMed ID: 19438937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Displacement of implant components from impressions to definitive casts.
Kim S; Nicholls JI; Han CH; Lee KW
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):747-55. PubMed ID: 17066636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of impression techniques for implants. Part 2 - comparison of splinting techniques.
Filho HG; Mazaro JV; Vedovatto E; Assunção WG; dos Santos PH
J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 19178624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays.
Burns J; Palmer R; Howe L; Wilson R
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12644799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The O-ring universal impression technique.
Hussaini S
J Prosthodont; 2008 Oct; 17(7):599-600. PubMed ID: 18761567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of impression coping splinting on the accuracy of the open-tray technique.
Kavadia V; Kourtis S; Zoidis P; Sarafianou A
Gen Dent; 2019; 67(3):e5-e9. PubMed ID: 31199752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]