These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

533 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19231566)

  • 21. Impressions in implant dentistry.
    Bhakta S; Vere J; Calder I; Patel R
    Br Dent J; 2011 Oct; 211(8):361-7. PubMed ID: 22015512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Impression techniques and misfit-induced strains on implant-supported superstructures: an in vitro study.
    Cehreli MC; Akça K
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Aug; 26(4):379-85. PubMed ID: 16939020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Accuracy of impressions and casts using different implant impression techniques in a multi-implant system with an internal hex connection.
    Wenz HJ; Hertrampf K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 18416411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Accuracy of impression techniques for implants. Part 1--Influence of transfer copings surface abrasion.
    Assunção WG; Cardoso A; Gomes EA; Tabata LF; dos Santos PH
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Dec; 17(8):641-7. PubMed ID: 19090889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of prosthesis design and impression techniques on human cortical bone strain around oral implants under load.
    Akça K; Kokat AM; Sahin S; Iplikcioglu H; Cehreli MC
    Med Eng Phys; 2009 Sep; 31(7):758-63. PubMed ID: 19269878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An alternative method of fabricating a custom tray for direct implant impressions.
    Cura C; Isik FG; Dundar M
    Gen Dent; 2011; 59(1):e22-4. PubMed ID: 21613027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Custom copings for accurate impressions of multiple internal connection implants.
    Ntounis A; Pelekanos S
    Implant Dent; 2010 Oct; 19(5):365-9. PubMed ID: 20881806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
    Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An implant-transfer technique without impression material.
    Assunção WG; Gomes EA; Aparecida Delben J; dos-Santos PH; Ricardo Barão VA; Tabata LF
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 21(4):1274-6. PubMed ID: 20613612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Prosthetic transfer impression accuracy evaluation for osseointegrated implants.
    Assunção WG; Tabata LF; Cardoso A; Rocha EP; Gomes EA
    Implant Dent; 2008 Sep; 17(3):248-56. PubMed ID: 18784525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Developing a fixture level cast for implants with interfering axial convergence.
    Ahuja SA; Wicks RA; Brandt RL
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 2010; 90(2):28-9; quiz 30-1. PubMed ID: 20698434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An accurate, single, platform-level impression technique for the fabrication of prosthetic restorations on dental implants.
    Marder MZ; Marder RW
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2005 Oct; 25(5):495-9. PubMed ID: 16250571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Use of implant-supported interim restorations to transfer periimplant soft tissue profiles to a milled polyurethane definitive cast.
    Lin WS; Harris BT; Morton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):333-7. PubMed ID: 23684284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Accuracy of implant impressions without impression copings: a three-dimensional analysis.
    Kwon JH; Son YH; Han CH; Kim S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Jun; 105(6):367-73. PubMed ID: 21640237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of impression accuracy for implant at various angulations.
    Assunção WG; Britto RC; Ricardo Barão VA; Delben JA; dos Santos PH
    Implant Dent; 2010 Apr; 19(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 20386220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Impression techniques for implant dentistry.
    Chee W; Jivraj S
    Br Dent J; 2006 Oct; 201(7):429-32. PubMed ID: 17031344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Accuracy of replacing three tapered transfer impression copings in two elastomeric impression materials.
    Liou AD; Nicholls JI; Yuodelis RA; Brudvik JS
    Int J Prosthodont; 1993; 6(4):377-83. PubMed ID: 8240649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of the accuracy of 3 transfer techniques for implant-supported prostheses with multiple abutments.
    Naconecy MM; Teixeira ER; Shinkai RS; Frasca LC; Cervieri A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):192-8. PubMed ID: 15101589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An evaluation of three implant level impression techniques for single tooth implant.
    Daoudi MF; Setchell DJ; Searson LJ
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2004 Mar; 12(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 15058176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Direct custom implant impression copings for the preservation of the pontic receptor site architecture.
    Schoenbaum TR; Han TJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Mar; 107(3):203-6. PubMed ID: 22489334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.