406 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19231572)
21. Colour correspondence of a ceramic system in two different shade guides.
Corciolani G; Vichi A; Goracci C; Ferrari M
J Dent; 2009 Feb; 37(2):98-101. PubMed ID: 18996635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Color comparison of two shade guides.
Paravina RD; Powers JM; Fay RM
Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 11887603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Repeatability of a dental shade-matching instrument when compared to traditional visual methods of shade evaluation.
Kanawati A; Richards MW
Gen Dent; 2009; 57(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 19903610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Difference in illuminant-dependent color changes of shade guide tabs by the shade designation relative to three illuminants.
Cha HS; Lee YK
Am J Dent; 2009 Dec; 22(6):350-6. PubMed ID: 20178211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Shade matching performance of normal and color vision-deficient dental professionals with standard daylight and tungsten illuminants.
Gokce HS; Piskin B; Ceyhan D; Gokce SM; Arisan V
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Mar; 103(3):139-47. PubMed ID: 20188236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Optimization of tooth color and shade guide design.
Paravina RD; Majkic G; Imai FH; Powers JM
J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):269-76. PubMed ID: 17451478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The linear shade guide design of Vita 3D-master performs as well as the original design of the Vita 3D-master.
Corcodel N; Rammelsberg P; Jakstat H; Moldovan O; Schwarz S; Hassel AJ
J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Nov; 37(11):860-5. PubMed ID: 20633072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The use of digital imaging for colour matching and communication in restorative dentistry.
Jarad FD; Russell MD; Moss BW
Br Dent J; 2005 Jul; 199(1):43-9; discussion 33. PubMed ID: 16003426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Color comparison of VITA shade guide and metal ceramic restoration].
Yang H; Sun J; Wang Z
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1999 May; 17(2):147-9. PubMed ID: 12539711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Color distribution of a shade guide in the value, chroma, and hue scale.
Ahn JS; Lee YK
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jul; 100(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 18589070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Colour compatibility between teeth and dental shade guides in Quinquagenarians and Septuagenarians.
Cocking C; Cevirgen E; Helling S; Oswald M; Corcodel N; Rammelsberg P; Reinelt G; Hassel AJ
J Oral Rehabil; 2009 Nov; 36(11):848-55. PubMed ID: 19793231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Tooth shade selection using a colorimetric instrument compared with that using a conventional shade guide.
Kuzmanović D; Lyons KM
N Z Dent J; 2009 Dec; 105(4):131-4. PubMed ID: 20000193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effects of shade tab arrangement on the repeatability and accuracy of shade selection.
Yılmaz B; Yuzugullu B; Cınar D; Berksun S
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Jun; 105(6):383-6. PubMed ID: 21640239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Application of a digital technique in evaluating the reliability of shade guides.
Cal E; Sonugelen M; Guneri P; Kesercioglu A; Kose T
J Oral Rehabil; 2004 May; 31(5):483-91. PubMed ID: 15140175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluation of a newly developed visual shade-matching apparatus.
Paravina RD
Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(6):528-34. PubMed ID: 12475156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of an anatomic dual-laminate composite resin shade guide.
Magne P; Bruzi G; Carvalho AO; Giannini M; Maia HP
J Dent; 2013 Aug; 41 Suppl 3():e80-6. PubMed ID: 23685035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A clinical evaluation of the individual repeatability of three commercially available colour measuring devices.
Khurana R; Tredwin CJ; Weisbloom M; Moles DR
Br Dent J; 2007 Dec; 203(12):675-80. PubMed ID: 18084212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Factors influencing the shade matching performance of dentists and dental technicians when using two different shade guides.
Alomari M; Chadwick RG
Br Dent J; 2011 Dec; 211(11):E23. PubMed ID: 22158197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Human-eye versus computerized color matching.
Yap AU; Sim CP; Loh WL; Teo JH
Oper Dent; 1999; 24(6):358-63. PubMed ID: 10823085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The repeatability of an intraoral dental colorimeter.
Tung FF; Goldstein GR; Jang S; Hittelman E
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):585-90. PubMed ID: 12488850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
