323 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19231771)
1. Anthropometric analysis of the human mandibular cortical bone as assessed by cone-beam computed tomography.
Swasty D; Lee JS; Huang JC; Maki K; Gansky SA; Hatcher D; Miller AJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 67(3):491-500. PubMed ID: 19231771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cross-sectional human mandibular morphology as assessed in vivo by cone-beam computed tomography in patients with different vertical facial dimensions.
Swasty D; Lee J; Huang JC; Maki K; Gansky SA; Hatcher D; Miller AJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Apr; 139(4 Suppl):e377-89. PubMed ID: 21435546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Anthropometric analysis of the mandible morphology in young females with different vertical skeletal pattern].
Xie Z; Li G; Guo J
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Jun; 30(3):299-303. PubMed ID: 22768772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cortical bone thickness at common miniscrew implant placement sites.
Farnsworth D; Rossouw PE; Ceen RF; Buschang PH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Apr; 139(4):495-503. PubMed ID: 21457860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Three-dimensional survey of the whole mandibular canal and mandibular morphology by cone beam computed tomography in normal young people].
Sheng L; Qu W; Li Y; Qu Z; Wang J
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Apr; 34(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 27337924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bone dimensions in the posterior mandible: a retrospective radiographic study using cone beam computed tomography. Part 1--analysis of dentate sites.
Braut V; Bornstein MM; Lauber R; Buser D
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2012 Apr; 32(2):175-84. PubMed ID: 22292147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Buccal cortical bone thickness at miniscrew placement sites in patients with different vertical skeletal patterns.
Veli I; Uysal T; Baysal A; Karadede I
J Orofac Orthop; 2014 Nov; 75(6):417-29. PubMed ID: 25344123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mandibular Canal Location: Cone-beam Computed Tomography Examination.
Koivisto T; Chiona D; Milroy LL; McClanahan SB; Ahmad M; Bowles WR
J Endod; 2016 Jul; 42(7):1018-21. PubMed ID: 27178249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cortical bone thickness of the adult alveolar process--a retrospective CBCT study.
Germec-Cakan D; Tozlu M; Ozdemir F
Aust Orthod J; 2014 May; 30(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 24968646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Variations in bone quantity in the posterior mandible: a cross-sectional cone beam computed tomographic study.
Safi Y; Amid R; Alizad-Rahvar M
Gen Dent; 2022; 70(1):10-16. PubMed ID: 34978983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cortical bone thickness of the alveolar process measured with cone-beam computed tomography in patients with different facial types.
Ozdemir F; Tozlu M; Germec-Cakan D
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Feb; 143(2):190-6. PubMed ID: 23374925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. CBCT assessment of bone thickness in maxillary and mandibular teeth: an anatomic study.
Porto OCL; Silva BSF; Silva JA; Estrela CRA; Alencar AHG; Bueno MDR; Estrela C
J Appl Oral Sci; 2020; 28():e20190148. PubMed ID: 32049133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Anatomic assessment of the mandibular buccal shelf for miniscrew insertion in white patients.
Elshebiny T; Palomo JM; Baumgaertel S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Apr; 153(4):505-511. PubMed ID: 29602342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Qualitative and morphological evaluation of the mandibular bone using computed tomography.
Priyadarshini SR; Sahoo PK; Niyogi S; Patnaik S; Bhuyan SK
Indian J Dent Res; 2020; 31(6):899-903. PubMed ID: 33753661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bone mineral density and mandibular residual ridge resorption.
Springe B; Slaidina A; Soboleva U; Lejnieks A
Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(3):270-6. PubMed ID: 24905270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computed tomography evaluation of mandibular incisor bony support in untreated patients.
Gracco A; Luca L; Bongiorno MC; Siciliani G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Aug; 138(2):179-87. PubMed ID: 20691359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative evaluation of cortical bone thickness with computed tomographic scanning for orthodontic implants.
Deguchi T; Nasu M; Murakami K; Yabuuchi T; Kamioka H; Takano-Yamamoto T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jun; 129(6):721.e7-12. PubMed ID: 16769488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relationship between mandibular symphysis dimensions and mandibular anterior alveolar bone thickness as assessed with cone-beam computed tomography.
Foosiri P; Mahatumarat K; Panmekiate S
Dental Press J Orthod; 2018 Jan; 23(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 29791685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Lingual concavities in the mandible: a morphological study using cross-sectional analysis determined by CBCT.
Nickenig HJ; Wichmann M; Eitner S; Zöller JE; Kreppel M
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 43(2):254-9. PubMed ID: 25547216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of bone surface size and cortical layer thickness measurements using cone beam computerized tomography.
Gerlach NL; Meijer GJ; Borstlap WA; Bronkhorst EM; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jul; 24(7):793-7. PubMed ID: 22469137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
