323 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19231771)
21. Cone Beam Computerized Tomography Measurement of Alveolar Ridge at Posterior Mandible for Implant Graft Estimation.
Zhang W; Tullis J; Weltman R
J Oral Implantol; 2015 Dec; 41(6):e231-7. PubMed ID: 25535890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Frequency and anatomic variability of the mandibular lingual foramina: a cone-beam CT study.
Taschieri S; Corbella S; Silnovic A; Francetti L; Messina C; Sconfienza LM; Albano D
BMC Med Imaging; 2022 Jan; 22(1):12. PubMed ID: 35057756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Variations in the buccal-lingual alveolar bone thickness of impacted mandibular third molar: our classification and treatment perspectives.
Ge J; Zheng JW; Yang C; Qian WT
Sci Rep; 2016 Jan; 6():16375. PubMed ID: 26759181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A digital volumetric tomography (DVT) study in the mandibular molar region for miniscrew placement during mixed dentition.
Bhattad MS; Baliga S; Vibhute P
Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(2):55-60. PubMed ID: 25992988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluation of location and dimensions of mandibular lingual canals: a cone beam computed tomography study.
Wang YM; Ju YR; Pan WL; Chan CP
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Sep; 44(9):1197-203. PubMed ID: 25890920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Observation of buccal foramen in mandibular body using cone-beam computed tomography.
Naitoh M; Nakahara K; Hiraiwa Y; Aimiya H; Gotoh K; Ariji E
Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn; 2009 May; 86(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 19522303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Bucco alveolar bone thickness of mandibular impacted third molars with different inclinations: a CBCT study.
Zambrano-De la Peña LS; Aliaga-Del Castillo A; Rodríguez-Cárdenas YA; Ruiz-Mora GA; Arriola-Guillén LE; Guerrero ME
Surg Radiol Anat; 2020 Sep; 42(9):1051-1056. PubMed ID: 32140764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. CBCT location of the fusion between the buccal and lingual cortical in the mandibular ramus: importance to sagittal split osteotomy.
Scomparin L; Soares MQ; Rubira CM; Yaedú RY; Imada TS; Centurion BS; Tolentino ES; Lauris JR; Rubira-Bullen IR
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2017 Jul; 22(4):e500-e505. PubMed ID: 28624835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A CBCT atlas of buccal cortical bone thickness in interradicular spaces.
Holmes PB; Wolf BJ; Zhou J
Angle Orthod; 2015 Nov; 85(6):911-9. PubMed ID: 25760885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Computed tomography morphology of the mandibular ramus at the lingual plane in patients with mandibular hyperplasia.
Ma J; Lu L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 38(8):823-6. PubMed ID: 19395237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Radiomorphometric indices and their relation to alveolar bone loss in completely edentulous Turkish patients: a retrospective study.
Yüzügüllü B; Gulsahi A; Imirzalioglu P
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Mar; 101(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 19231567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of mandibular cross-sectional morphology between Class I and Class II subjects with different vertical patterns: based on CBCT images and statistical shape analysis.
Chen H; Liu Z; Hu X; Wu B; Gu Y
BMC Oral Health; 2021 May; 21(1):238. PubMed ID: 33952217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Morphological assessment of the mandibular canal trajectory in dentate subjects.
Sîrbu VD; Perlea P; Nimigean VR; Bădiţă DG; Şerban A; Nimigean V
Rom J Morphol Embryol; 2017; 58(4):1401-1408. PubMed ID: 29556634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A morphometric analysis of the mandibular canal by cone beam computed tomography and its relevance to the sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Chrcanovic BR; de Carvalho Machado V; Gjelvold B
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Jun; 20(2):183-90. PubMed ID: 26875084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Quantitative CBCT evaluation of maxillary and mandibular cortical bone thickness and density variability for orthodontic miniplate placement.
Rossi M; Bruno G; De Stefani A; Perri A; Gracco A
Int Orthod; 2017 Dec; 15(4):610-624. PubMed ID: 29113844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Optimal sites for mini-implant insertion in the lingual or palatal alveolar cortical bone as assessed by cone beam computed tomography in South Indian population.
Mallick S; Murali PS; Kuttappa MN; Shetty P; Nair A
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2021 Feb; 24(1):121-129. PubMed ID: 32749047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Inferior alveolar nerve canal position: a clinical and radiographic study.
Levine MH; Goddard AL; Dodson TB
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Mar; 65(3):470-4. PubMed ID: 17307595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Assessment of Bone Width for Implants in the Posterior Mandible.
Block MS; Scoggin ZD; Yu Q
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Sep; 73(9):1715-22. PubMed ID: 25889373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of voxel values in mandibular cancellous bone: relationship between cone-beam computed tomography and multislice helical computed tomography.
Naitoh M; Hirukawa A; Katsumata A; Ariji E
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 May; 20(5):503-6. PubMed ID: 19250241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Cross-sectional analysis of the mandibular lingual concavity using cone beam computed tomography.
Chan HL; Brooks SL; Fu JH; Yeh CY; Rudek I; Wang HL
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Feb; 22(2):201-6. PubMed ID: 21044167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
