258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1923208)
1. A randomized trial of three methods of obtaining Papanicolaou smears.
Pretorius RG; Sadeghi M; Fotheringham N; Semrad N; Watring WG
Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):831-6. PubMed ID: 1923208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cervical cytology after cryosurgery, laser ablation and conization. A comparison of the cotton swab and endocervical brush.
Partoll LM; Javaheri G
Acta Cytol; 1993; 37(6):876-8. PubMed ID: 8249505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A randomized clinical trial comparing the Cytobrush and cotton swab for Papanicolaou smears.
Koonings PP; Dickinson K; d'Ablaing G; Schlaerth JB
Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Aug; 80(2):241-5. PubMed ID: 1635737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Cytobrush effect on Pap smear adequacy.
Davey-Sullivan B; Gearhart J; Evers CG; Cason Z; Replogle WH
Fam Pract Res J; 1991 Mar; 11(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 2028815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the Cytobrush plus plastic spatula with the Cervex Brush for obtaining endocervical cells.
Cannon JM; Blythe JG
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Oct; 82(4 Pt 1):569-72. PubMed ID: 8377984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Endocervical brush versus cotton swab for obtaining cervical smears at a clinic. A cost comparison.
Harrison DD; Hernandez E; Dunton CJ
J Reprod Med; 1993 Apr; 38(4):285-8. PubMed ID: 8501736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative yield of endocervical and metaplastic cells. Two sampling techniques: wooden spatula and cytology brush.
Lo L; Jordan J
Can Fam Physician; 1995 Sep; 41():1497-502. PubMed ID: 8520238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cervical smears following laser treatment. Comparison of Cervex brush versus Cytobrush-Ayre spatula sampling.
Szarewski A; Cuzick J; Singer A
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):76-8. PubMed ID: 1994639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of spatula and nonspatula methods for cervical sampling.
Rammou-Kinia R; Anagnostopoulou I; Gomousa M
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 1994638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficacy of cotton-tipped applicators for obtaining cells from the uterine cervix for Papanicolaou smears.
Shen JT; Nalick RH; Schlaerth JB; Morrow CP
Acta Cytol; 1984; 28(5):541-5. PubMed ID: 6592916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Endocervical brush cytology. An alternative to endocervical curettage?
Weitzman GA; Korhonen MO; Reeves KO; Irwin JF; Carter TS; Kaufman RH
J Reprod Med; 1988 Aug; 33(8):677-83. PubMed ID: 3172071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing the yield of the standard Papanicolaou and endocervical brush smears.
Hoffman MS; Hill DA; Gordy LW; Lane J; Cavanagh D
J Reprod Med; 1991 Apr; 36(4):267-9. PubMed ID: 1649306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the endocervical Cytobrush and Cervex-Brush in pregnant women.
Paraiso MF; Brady K; Helmchen R; Roat TW
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 84(4):539-43. PubMed ID: 8090390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Cervix cytology: Cervex Brush versus conventional cotton swab].
Altermatt HJ; Wyler K; Fravi R; Liu X; Kraft R; Dreher E
Praxis (Bern 1994); 1997 Jun; 86(24):1029-33. PubMed ID: 9312820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The screening Papanicolaou smear: contribution of the endocervical brush.
Taylor PT; Andersen WA; Barber SR; Covell JL; Smith EB; Underwood PB
Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Nov; 70(5):734-8. PubMed ID: 3658282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Brush vs. spatula for cervical smears. Histologic correlation with concurrent biopsies.
Chakrabarti S; Guijon FB; Paraskevas M
Acta Cytol; 1994; 38(3):315-8. PubMed ID: 8191818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficacy of the cytobrush versus the cotton swab in the collection of endocervical cells.
Kristensen GB; Hølund B; Grinsted P
Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(6):849-51. PubMed ID: 2588918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cervical cytology: a randomized comparison of four sampling methods.
McCord ML; Stovall TG; Meric JL; Summitt RL; Coleman SA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Jun; 166(6 Pt 1):1772-7; discussion 1777-9. PubMed ID: 1615986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The efficacy of an endocervical brush in obtaining adequate Papanicolaou smears.
Grossman MB; Clofine R
J Am Osteopath Assoc; 1991 Sep; 91(9):875-9. PubMed ID: 1757278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Safety, efficacy and cost of three cervical cytology sampling devices in a prenatal clinic.
Smith-Levitin M; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P
J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):749-53. PubMed ID: 8913977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
