92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19232887)
1. Randomized comparison between 3 surface treatments of a single anteverted stem design: 84 hips followed for 5 years.
Thien TM; Thanner J; Kärrholm J
J Arthroplasty; 2010 Apr; 25(3):437-444.e1. PubMed ID: 19232887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. New polymer materials in total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation with radiostereometry, bone densitometry, radiography and clinical parameters.
Digas G
Acta Orthop Suppl; 2005 Feb; 76(315):3-82. PubMed ID: 15790289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Cemented versus cementless revision femoral stems using morselized allograft--a prospective, randomized study with 5 years follow-up].
Nesse E; Nielsen EW; Bastian D
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(6):678-83. PubMed ID: 14679434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical outcome and quantitative evaluation of periprosthetic bone-remodeling of an uncemented femoral component with taper design. A prospective study.
Pitto RP; Schramm M; Hohmann D; Schmidt R
Chir Organi Mov; 2001; 86(2):87-97. PubMed ID: 12025051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Different loss of BMD using uncemented press-fit and whole polyethylene cups fixed with cement: repeated DXA studies in 96 hips randomized to 3 types of fixation.
Digas G; Kärrholm J; Thanner J
Acta Orthop; 2006 Apr; 77(2):218-26. PubMed ID: 16752282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Addition of fluoride to acrylic bone cement does not improve fixation of a total hip arthroplasty stem.
Digas G; Kärrholm J; Thanner J
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Jul; 448():58-66. PubMed ID: 16826097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The uncemented isoelastic/isotitan total hip arthroplasty. A 10-15 years follow-up with bone mineral density evaluation.
Nagi ON; Kumar S; Aggarwal S
Acta Orthop Belg; 2006 Jan; 72(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 16570896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Periprosthetic bone remodeling using a triple-taper polished cemented stem in total hip arthroplasty.
Buckland AJ; Dowsey MM; Stoney JD; Hardidge AJ; Ng KW; Choong PF
J Arthroplasty; 2010 Oct; 25(7):1083-90. PubMed ID: 19879719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Early aseptic loosening of the CF 30 femoral stem].
Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Feb; 74(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 17331456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fluoride-containing acrylic bone cement in total hip arthroplasty. Randomized evaluation of 97 stems using radiostereometry and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.
Digas G; Thanner J; Anderberg C; Kärrholm J
J Arthroplasty; 2005 Sep; 20(6):784-92. PubMed ID: 16139717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Periprosthetic mineral density in cement-free hip replacement arthroplasty].
Reiter A; Sabo D; Simank HG; Büchner T; Seidel M; Lukoschek M
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1997; 135(6):499-504. PubMed ID: 9499515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Periprosthetic changes in bone mineral density in 5 stem designs 5 years after cemented total hip arthroplasty. No relation to stem migration.
Li MG; Rohrl SM; Wood DJ; Nivbrant B
J Arthroplasty; 2007 Aug; 22(5):689-91. PubMed ID: 17689776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Comparative periprosthetic bone density measurements of the proximal femur shaft using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) with experimental "Press Fit-gliding Stem Prosthesis"].
Krüger A; Berli B; Lampert C; Kränzlin C; Morscher E
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1998; 136(2):115-25. PubMed ID: 9615973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of two hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stems: clinical, functional, and bone densitometry evaluation of patients randomized to a regular or modified hydroxyapatite-coated stem aimed at proximal fixation.
Sluimer JC; Hoefnagels NH; Emans PJ; Kuijer R; Geesink RG
J Arthroplasty; 2006 Apr; 21(3):344-52. PubMed ID: 16627141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Seventeen-year survival of the cementless CLS Spotorno stem.
Müller LA; Wenger N; Schramm M; Hohmann D; Forst R; Carl HD
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2010 Feb; 130(2):269-75. PubMed ID: 19760225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The bone-vacuum cementing technique for the fixation of the stem in total hip arthroplasty.
Pitto RP; Kessler M; Schikora N; di Muria GV
Chir Organi Mov; 2001; 86(2):99-110. PubMed ID: 12025052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differences in stability and bone remodeling between a customized uncemented hydroxyapatite coated and a standard cemented femoral stem A randomized study with use of radiostereometry and bone densitometry.
Grant P; Aamodt A; Falch JA; Nordsletten L
J Orthop Res; 2005 Nov; 23(6):1280-5. PubMed ID: 15925474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mode of loosening of matt-finished femoral stems in primary total hip replacement.
Behairy YM; Harris WH
Saudi Med J; 2002 Oct; 23(10):1187-94. PubMed ID: 12436120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Staged bilateral total hip arthroplasty using rough and smooth surface femoral stems with similar design: 10-year survivorship of 48 cases.
Datir SP; Wynn-Jones CH
Acta Orthop; 2005 Dec; 76(6):809-14. PubMed ID: 16470434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Femoral remodeling after porous-coated total hip arthroplasty with and without hydroxyapatite-tricalcium phosphate coating: a prospective randomized trial.
Tanzer M; Kantor S; Rosenthall L; Bobyn JD
J Arthroplasty; 2001 Aug; 16(5):552-8. PubMed ID: 11503113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
