These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1923325)
1. Task and visual performance with concentric bifocal contact lenses. Sheedy JE; Harris MG; Bronge MR; Joe SM; Mook MA Optom Vis Sci; 1991 Jul; 68(7):537-41. PubMed ID: 1923325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patient response to concentric bifocal contact lenses. Harris MG; Sheedy JE; Bronge MR; Joe SM; Mook MA J Am Optom Assoc; 1991 May; 62(5):389-93. PubMed ID: 1813535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Vision and task performance with monovision and diffractive bifocal contact lenses. Harris MG; Sheedy JE; Gan CM Optom Vis Sci; 1992 Aug; 69(8):609-14. PubMed ID: 1513556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Visual performance of subjects wearing presbyopic contact lenses. Rajagopalan AS; Bennett ES; Lakshminarayanan V Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 83(8):611-5. PubMed ID: 16909087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Bifocal contact lenses as a correction method in presbyopia]. Avetisov SE; Rybakova EG; Egorova GB; Churkina MN; Borodina NV; Boev VI Vestn Oftalmol; 2003; 119(4):28-31. PubMed ID: 12934502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does the presbyopic visual system adapt to contact lenses? Sheedy JE; Harris MG; Gan CM Optom Vis Sci; 1993 Jun; 70(6):482-6. PubMed ID: 8336910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Task and visual performance with contact lenses and spectacles. Sheedy JE; Harris MG; Poon L; Sakuda T Optom Vis Sci; 1992 May; 69(5):337-41. PubMed ID: 1594194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of suppression, stereoacuity, and interocular differences in visual acuity in monovision and acuvue bifocal contact lenses. Kirschen DG; Hung CC; Nakano TR Optom Vis Sci; 1999 Dec; 76(12):832-7. PubMed ID: 10612404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Peripheral visual acuity with monovision and other contact lens corrections for presbyopia. Collins MJ; Brown B; Verney SJ; Makras M; Bowman KJ Optom Vis Sci; 1989 Jun; 66(6):370-4. PubMed ID: 2771322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of target distance and pupil size on letter contrast sensitivity with simultaneous vision bifocal contact lenses. Bradley A; Abdul Rahman H; Soni PS; Zhang X Optom Vis Sci; 1993 Jun; 70(6):476-81. PubMed ID: 8336909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative visual performance of three presbyopic contact lens corrections. Back A; Grant T; Hine N Optom Vis Sci; 1992 Jun; 69(6):474-80. PubMed ID: 1641231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stereopsis in presbyopes wearing monovision and simultaneous vision bifocal contact lenses. McGill E; Erickson P Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1988 Aug; 65(8):619-26. PubMed ID: 3177586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A new method to analyse the effect of multifocal contact lenses on visual function. Sanchez I; Ortiz-Toquero S; Blanco M; Martin R Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2018 Apr; 41(2):169-174. PubMed ID: 29217455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correction of presbyopia with contact lenses: comparative success rates with three systems. Back AP; Holden BA; Hine NA Optom Vis Sci; 1989 Aug; 66(8):518-25. PubMed ID: 2771342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]