These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1923405)

  • 1. Diagnosis of alveolar bone changes with digital subtraction images and conventional radiographs. An in vitro study.
    Nicopoulou-Karayianni K; Brägger U; Bürgin W; Nielsen PM; Lang NP
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Aug; 72(2):251-6. PubMed ID: 1923405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sensitivity of various radiographic methods for detection of oral cancellous bone lesions.
    Parsell DE; Gatewood RS; Watts JD; Streckfus CF
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Oct; 86(4):498-502. PubMed ID: 9798239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digital subtraction radiography for detecting cortical and cancellous bone changes in the periapical region.
    Tyndall DA; Kapa SF; Bagnell CP
    J Endod; 1990 Apr; 16(4):173-8. PubMed ID: 2074408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of contrast enhancement and pseudocolor transformation on the diagnosis with digital subtraction images (DSI).
    Brägger U; Bürgin W; Marconi M; Häsler RU; Lang NP
    J Periodontal Res; 1994 Mar; 29(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 8158504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computer-assisted subtraction radiography in periodontal diagnosis.
    Gröndahl K
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1987; 50():1-44. PubMed ID: 3321498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Periodontal disease morbidity quantification. II. Validation of alveolar bone loss measurements and vertical defect diagnosis from digital bite-wing images.
    Hildebolt CF; Vannier MW; Shrout MK; Pilgram TK; Province M; Vahey EP; Rietz DW
    J Periodontol; 1990 Oct; 61(10):623-32. PubMed ID: 2231229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of small angle discrepancies on interpretations of subtraction images.
    Davis M; Allen KM; Hausmann E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Sep; 78(3):397-400. PubMed ID: 7970605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analytical methodology in quantitative digital subtraction radiography: analyses of the aluminum reference wedge.
    Allen KM; Hausmann E
    J Periodontol; 1996 Dec; 67(12):1317-21. PubMed ID: 8997679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison between subtraction radiography and conventional radiographic interpretation during long-term evaluation of periodontal therapy in Class II furcation defects.
    Cury PR; Araujo NS; Bowie J; Sallum EA; Jeffcoat MK
    J Periodontol; 2004 Aug; 75(8):1145-9. PubMed ID: 15455744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical validation of a new subtraction radiography technique for periodontal bone loss detection.
    Nummikoski PV; Steffensen B; Hamilton K; Dove SB
    J Periodontol; 2000 Apr; 71(4):598-605. PubMed ID: 10807124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detection of small lesions in alveolar bone by digital subtraction radiography.
    Ying SY; Chen X; Zhang G; Cao CF
    Chin J Dent Res; 1999 May; 2(2):19-22. PubMed ID: 10863402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Color conversion of alveolar bone density changes in digital subtraction images.
    Brägger U; Pasquali L
    J Clin Periodontol; 1989 Apr; 16(4):209-14. PubMed ID: 2654196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital subtraction radiography for diagnosis of periodontal bone lesions with simulated high-speed systems.
    Gröndahl K; Gröndahl HG; Webber RL
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1983 Mar; 55(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 6340021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radiographic methods in the evaluation of periodontal therapy.
    Reddy MS
    J Periodontol; 1992 Dec; 63(12 Suppl):1078-84. PubMed ID: 1479529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of stent versus laser- and cephalostat-aligned periapical film-positioning techniques for use in digital subtraction radiography.
    Ludlow JB; Peleaux CP
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Feb; 77(2):208-15. PubMed ID: 8139840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The detection of in vitro produced periodontal bone lesions by conventional radiography and photographic subtraction radiography using observers and quantitative digital subtraction radiography.
    Janssen PT; van Palenstein Helderman WH; van Aken J
    J Clin Periodontol; 1989 Jul; 16(6):335-41. PubMed ID: 2668346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Digital subtraction radiography technique in oral diagnosis].
    Nicopoulou-Karayianni K; Braegger U; Lang NP
    Odontostomatol Proodos; 1989 Oct; 43(5):409-15. PubMed ID: 2518067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro calibration and validation of a digital subtraction radiography system using scanned images.
    Woo BM; Zee KY; Chan FH; Corbet EF
    J Clin Periodontol; 2003 Feb; 30(2):114-8. PubMed ID: 12622852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detection of experimentally induced lesions in subtraction images of cancellous alveolar bone.
    Katsarsky JW; Levine MS; Allen KM; Hausmann E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Jun; 77(6):674-7. PubMed ID: 8065737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bitewing-based alveolar bone densitometry: digital imaging resolution requirements.
    Hildebolt CF; Bartlett TQ; Brunsden BS; Hente NL; Gravier MJ; Walkup RK; Shrout MK; Vannier MW
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 Aug; 23(3):129-34. PubMed ID: 7835512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.