These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

51 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19234298)

  • 1. Whatever happens in the laboratory stays in the laboratory: the prevalence and prevention of participant crosstalk.
    Edlund JE; Sagarin BJ; Skowronski JJ; Johnson SJ; Kutter J
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2009 May; 35(5):635-42. PubMed ID: 19234298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The prevalence and prevention of crosstalk: a multi-institutional study.
    Edlund JE; Nichols AL; Okdie BM; Guadagno RE; Eno CA; Heider JD; Hansen EJ; Sagarin BJ; Blackhart G; Cottrell CA; Wilcox KT
    J Soc Psychol; 2014; 154(3):181-5. PubMed ID: 24873021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The good-subject effect: investigating participant demand characteristics.
    Nichols AL; Maner JK
    J Gen Psychol; 2008 Apr; 135(2):151-65. PubMed ID: 18507315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Deception in stress reactivity and recovery research.
    Linden W; Talbot Ellis A; Millman R
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Jan; 75(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 19895856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Informed consent: I. The institutional non-liability clause as a liability in recruiting research subjects.
    Trice AD; Ogden EP
    J Soc Behav Pers; 1986; 1(3):391-6. PubMed ID: 11659090
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Participant responses to retrospective surveys of child maltreatment: does mode of assessment matter?
    DiLillo D; DeGue S; Kras A; Di Loreto-Colgan AR; Nash C
    Violence Vict; 2006 Aug; 21(4):410-24. PubMed ID: 16897910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Toward understanding in postmodern interview analysis: interpreting the contradictory remarks of a research participant.
    Power EM
    Qual Health Res; 2004 Jul; 14(6):858-65. PubMed ID: 15200804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robust recollection rejection in the memory conjunction paradigm.
    Lampinen JM; Odegard TN; Neuschatz JS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Mar; 30(2):332-42. PubMed ID: 14979808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Participant expectancies in double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trials: potential limitations to trial validity.
    Colagiuri B
    Clin Trials; 2010 Jun; 7(3):246-55. PubMed ID: 20421243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Coparticipant effects on subjects' decisions to consent for risk-involving research.
    Finney PD
    J Soc Psychol; 1984 Oct; 124(First half):35-41. PubMed ID: 11653799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A community-based study on induced abortions: some unanswered questions.
    Ravindran TK; Ramanathan M; Alex SC
    Issues Med Ethics; 2001; 9(2):36-7. PubMed ID: 16334467
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing the adequacy of postexperimental inquiries in deception research and the factors that promote participant honesty.
    Blackhart GC; Brown KE; Clark T; Pierce DL; Shell K
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Mar; 44(1):24-40. PubMed ID: 21761263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Self-deception and the therapist: an interpretative phenomenological analysis of the experiences and understandings of therapists working with clients they describe as self-deceptive.
    Westland S; Shinebourne P
    Psychol Psychother; 2009 Dec; 82(Pt 4):385-401. PubMed ID: 19505357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Confidentiality and autonomy: the challenge(s) of offering research participants a choice of disclosing their identity.
    Giordano J; O'Reilly M; Taylor H; Dogra N
    Qual Health Res; 2007 Feb; 17(2):264-75. PubMed ID: 17220396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of intention to conceal in the P300-based concealed information test.
    Kubo K; Nittono H
    Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback; 2009 Sep; 34(3):227-35. PubMed ID: 19499325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assuring ethical treatment of students as research participants.
    Ridley RT
    J Nurs Educ; 2009 Oct; 48(10):537-41. PubMed ID: 19645366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differentiation of deception using pupillary responses as an index of cognitive processing.
    Dionisio DP; Granholm E; Hillix WA; Perrine WF
    Psychophysiology; 2001 Mar; 38(2):205-11. PubMed ID: 11347866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Participants' naiveté and confidentiality in psychological research.
    Tindell DR; Bohlander RW
    Psychol Rep; 2005 Jun; 96(3 Pt 2):963-9. PubMed ID: 16173361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Knowledge of results and learning to tell the time in an adult male with an intellectual disability: a single-subject research design.
    Applegate SL; Rice MS; Stein F; Maitra KK
    Occup Ther Int; 2008; 15(1):32-44. PubMed ID: 18067197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of the impact of a patient clinical trials handbook among pharmacy students.
    Graham AC; Raisch DW; Fye CL; Sather MR
    Clin Ther; 2005 Feb; 27(2):238-45. PubMed ID: 15811487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.