433 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19235581)
1. Primary three-dimensional analysis with perspective-filet view versus primary two-dimensional analysis: evaluation of lesion detection by inexperienced readers at computed tomographic colonography in symptomatic patients.
Fisichella VA; Jäderling F; Horvath S; Stotzer PO; Kilander A; Hellström M
Acta Radiol; 2009 Apr; 50(3):244-55. PubMed ID: 19235581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computer-aided detection (CAD) as a second reader using perspective filet view at CT colonography: effect on performance of inexperienced readers.
Fisichella VA; Jäderling F; Horvath S; Stotzer PO; Kilander A; Båth M; Hellström M
Clin Radiol; 2009 Oct; 64(10):972-82. PubMed ID: 19748002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Polyp detection with CT colonography: primary 3D endoluminal analysis versus primary 2D transverse analysis with computer-assisted reader software.
Taylor SA; Halligan S; Slater A; Goh V; Burling DN; Roddie ME; Honeyfield L; McQuillan J; Amin H; Dehmeshki J
Radiology; 2006 Jun; 239(3):759-67. PubMed ID: 16543593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [CT colonography: evaluation of two 3D algorithms in a screening population].
Juchems MS; Ernst AS; Sheafor DH; Carrascosa P; Virmany S; Brambs HJ; Aschoff AJ
Rofo; 2009 Jun; 181(6):573-8. PubMed ID: 19440949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. False-negative results at multi-detector row CT colonography: multivariate analysis of causes for missed lesions.
Park SH; Ha HK; Kim MJ; Kim KW; Kim AY; Yang DH; Lee MG; Kim PN; Shin YM; Yang SK; Myung SJ; Min YI
Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):495-502. PubMed ID: 15770042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. CT colonography: role of a second reader CAD paradigm in the initial training of radiologists.
Neri E; Faggioni L; Regge D; Vagli P; Turini F; Cerri F; Picano E; Giusti S; Bartolozzi C
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):303-9. PubMed ID: 20832219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of a unidirectional panoramic 3D endoluminal interpretation technique to traditional 2D and bidirectional 3D interpretation techniques at CT colonography: preliminary observations.
Lenhart DK; Babb J; Bonavita J; Kim D; Bini EJ; Megibow AJ; Macari M
Clin Radiol; 2010 Feb; 65(2):118-25. PubMed ID: 20103433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sensitivity of CT colonography for nonpolypoid colorectal lesions interpreted by human readers and with computer-aided detection.
Park SH; Kim SY; Lee SS; Bogoni L; Kim AY; Yang SK; Myung SJ; Byeon JS; Ye BD; Ha HK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Jul; 193(1):70-8. PubMed ID: 19542397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Polyp detection at 3-dimensional endoluminal computed tomography colonography: sensitivity of one-way fly-through at 120 degrees field-of-view angle.
Pickhardt PJ; Schumacher C; Kim DH
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(4):631-5. PubMed ID: 19638863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of axial, coronal, and primary 3D review in MDCT colonography for the detection of small polyps: a phantom study.
Mang T; Schaefer-Prokop C; Schima W; Maier A; Schober E; Mueller-Mang C; Weber M; Prokop M
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 18221849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of slice thickness and primary 2D versus 3D virtual dissection on colorectal lesion detection at CT colonography in 452 asymptomatic adults.
Johnson CD; Fletcher JG; MacCarty RL; Mandrekar JN; Harmsen WS; Limburg PJ; Wilson LA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Sep; 189(3):672-80. PubMed ID: 17715116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficacy of computer-aided detection as a second reader for 6-9-mm lesions at CT colonography: multicenter prospective trial.
Regge D; Della Monica P; Galatola G; Laudi C; Zambon A; Correale L; Asnaghi R; Barbaro B; Borghi C; Campanella D; Cassinis MC; Ferrari R; Ferraris A; Hassan C; Golfieri R; Iafrate F; Iussich G; Laghi A; Massara R; Neri E; Sali L; Venturini S; Gandini G
Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):168-76. PubMed ID: 23151831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Primary 2D versus primary 3D polyp detection at screening CT colonography.
Pickhardt PJ; Lee AD; Taylor AJ; Michel SJ; Winter TC; Shadid A; Meiners RJ; Chase PJ; Hinshaw JL; Williams JG; Prout TM; Husain SH; Kim DH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Dec; 189(6):1451-6. PubMed ID: 18029884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. CT colonography: multiobserver diagnostic performance.
McFarland EG; Pilgram TK; Brink JA; McDermott RA; Santillan CV; Brady PW; Heiken JP; Balfe DM; Weinstock LB; Thyssen EP; Littenberg B
Radiology; 2002 Nov; 225(2):380-90. PubMed ID: 12409570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Virtual colonoscopy in paediatric patients Usefulness of a colon dissection technique.
Carrascosa P; López EM; Capuñay C; Vallejos J; Carrascosa J
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Apr; 74(1):189-94. PubMed ID: 19345031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Electronic colon-cleansing for CT colonography: diagnostic performance.
Juchems MS; Ernst A; Johnson P; Virmani S; Brambs HJ; Aschoff AJ
Abdom Imaging; 2009; 34(3):359-64. PubMed ID: 18343970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computer-based self-training for CT colonography with and without CAD.
Sali L; Delsanto S; Sacchetto D; Correale L; Falchini M; Ferraris A; Gandini G; Grazzini G; Iafrate F; Iussich G; Morra L; Laghi A; Mascalchi M; Regge D
Eur Radiol; 2018 Nov; 28(11):4783-4791. PubMed ID: 29796918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. ACRIN CT colonography trial: does reader's preference for primary two-dimensional versus primary three-dimensional interpretation affect performance?
Hara AK; Blevins M; Chen MH; Dachman AH; Kuo MD; Menias CO; Siewert B; Cheema JI; Obregon RG; Fidler JL; Zimmerman P; Horton KM; Coakley KJ; Iyer RB; Halvorsen RA; Casola G; Yee J; Herman BA; Johnson CD
Radiology; 2011 May; 259(2):435-41. PubMed ID: 21364081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Colonic polyps: application value of computer-aided detection in computed tomographic colonography.
Zhang HM; Guo W; Liu GF; An DH; Gao SH; Sun LB; Yang HS
Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Feb; 124(3):380-4. PubMed ID: 21362337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. CT colonography: influence of 3D viewing and polyp candidate features on interpretation with computer-aided detection.
Shi R; Schraedley-Desmond P; Napel S; Olcott EW; Jeffrey RB; Yee J; Zalis ME; Margolis D; Paik DS; Sherbondy AJ; Sundaram P; Beaulieu CF
Radiology; 2006 Jun; 239(3):768-76. PubMed ID: 16714460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
