BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

497 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19236984)

  • 1. Construct validity of functional capacity evaluation lifting tests in construction workers on sick leave as a result of musculoskeletal disorders.
    Gouttebarge V; Wind H; Kuijer PP; Sluiter JK; Frings-Dresen MH
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2009 Feb; 90(2):302-8. PubMed ID: 19236984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Criterion-related validity of functional capacity evaluation lifting tests on future work disability risk and return to work in the construction industry.
    Gouttebarge V; Kuijer PP; Wind H; van Duivenbooden C; Sluiter JK; Frings-Dresen MH
    Occup Environ Med; 2009 Oct; 66(10):657-63. PubMed ID: 19468014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. DASH questionnaire for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms in industry workers: a validity and reliability study.
    Kitis A; Celik E; Aslan UB; Zencir M
    Appl Ergon; 2009 Mar; 40(2):251-5. PubMed ID: 18555973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intra- and interrater reliability of the Ergo-Kit functional capacity evaluation method in adults without musculoskeletal complaints.
    Gouttebarge V; Wind H; Kuijer PP; Sluiter JK; Frings-Dresen MH
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2005 Dec; 86(12):2354-60. PubMed ID: 16344035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Health problems lead to considerable productivity loss at work among workers with high physical load jobs.
    Meerding WJ; IJzelenberg W; Koopmanschap MA; Severens JL; Burdorf A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 May; 58(5):517-23. PubMed ID: 15845339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Value of functional capacity evaluation information in a clinical setting for predicting return to work.
    Streibelt M; Blume C; Thren K; Reneman MF; Mueller-Fahrnow W
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2009 Mar; 90(3):429-34. PubMed ID: 19254607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability and agreement of 5 Ergo-Kit functional capacity evaluation lifting tests in subjects with low back pain.
    Gouttebarge V; Wind H; Kuijer PP; Sluiter JK; Frings-Dresen MH
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Oct; 87(10):1365-70. PubMed ID: 17023247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How to assess physical work-ability with Functional Capacity Evaluation methods in a more specific and efficient way?
    Gouttebarge V; Wind H; Kuijer PP; Sluiter JK; Frings-Dresen MH
    Work; 2010; 37(1):111-5. PubMed ID: 20858993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders of perioperative personnel in the Netherlands.
    Meijsen P; Knibbe HJ
    AORN J; 2007 Aug; 86(2):193-208. PubMed ID: 17683718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What is the role of "nonorganic somatic components" in functional capacity evaluations in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain undergoing fitness for work evaluation?
    Oesch P; Meyer K; Jansen B; Mowinckel P; Bachmann S; Hagen KB
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Feb; 37(4):E243-50. PubMed ID: 21857400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do workers with chronic nonspecific musculoskeletal pain, with and without sick leave, have lower functional capacity compared with healthy workers?
    Soer R; de Vries HJ; Brouwer S; Groothoff JW; Geertzen JH; Reneman MF
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Dec; 93(12):2216-22. PubMed ID: 22772082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Association between clinician-assessed lifting ability and workplace tolerance and patient self-reported pain and disability following work conditioning.
    Hart DL; Kirk M; Howar J; Mongeon S
    Work; 2007; 28(2):111-9. PubMed ID: 17312343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Four-year incidence of sick leave because of neck and shoulder pain and its association with work and lifestyle.
    Alipour A; Ghaffari M; Shariati B; Jensen I; Vingard E
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Feb; 34(4):413-8. PubMed ID: 19214103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [SIMBO: a Screening Instrument for Identification of Work-Related Disabilities--analyses of construct and prognostic validity].
    Streibelt M; Gerwinn H; Hansmeier T; Thren K; Müller-Fahrnow W
    Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2007 Oct; 46(5):266-75. PubMed ID: 17955394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Some occupational determinants of work disability].
    Szubert Z; Sobala W
    Med Pr; 1999; 50(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 10399717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can functional capacity tests predict future work capacity in patients with whiplash-associated disorders?
    Trippolini MA; Dijkstra PU; Côté P; Scholz-Odermatt SM; Geertzen JH; Reneman MF
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2014 Dec; 95(12):2357-66. PubMed ID: 25127998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validity and reliability of the Brazilian version of the Work Ability Index questionnaire.
    Martinez MC; Latorre Mdo R; Fischer FM
    Rev Saude Publica; 2009 Jun; 43(3):525-32. PubMed ID: 19347177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prognostic value of self-reported work ability and performance-based lifting tests for sustainable return to work among construction workers.
    Kuijer PP; Gouttebarge V; Wind H; van Duivenbooden C; Sluiter JK; Frings-Dresen MH
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2012 Nov; 38(6):600-3. PubMed ID: 22538928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does the number of musculoskeletal pain sites predict work disability? A 14-year prospective study.
    Kamaleri Y; Natvig B; Ihlebaek CM; Bruusgaard D
    Eur J Pain; 2009 Apr; 13(4):426-30. PubMed ID: 18599328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Construct Validity of Functional Capacity Evaluation in Patients with Whiplash-Associated Disorders.
    Trippolini MA; Dijkstra PU; Geertzen JH; Reneman MF
    J Occup Rehabil; 2015 Sep; 25(3):481-92. PubMed ID: 25385201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.