BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19237234)

  • 1. Validation of enamel erosion in vitro.
    Elton V; Cooper L; Higham SM; Pender N
    J Dent; 2009 May; 37(5):336-41. PubMed ID: 19237234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The erosive potential of some alcopops using bovine enamel: an in vitro study.
    Ablal MA; Kaur JS; Cooper L; Jarad FD; Milosevic A; Higham SM; Preston AJ
    J Dent; 2009 Nov; 37(11):835-9. PubMed ID: 19616357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The validation of quantitative light-induced fluorescence to quantify acid erosion of human enamel.
    Pretty IA; Edgar WM; Higham SM
    Arch Oral Biol; 2004 Apr; 49(4):285-94. PubMed ID: 15003547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF) and digital imaging applied for the detection and quantification of staining and stain removal on teeth.
    Adeyemi AA; Jarad FD; Pender N; Higham SM
    J Dent; 2006 Aug; 34(7):460-6. PubMed ID: 16337328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantification of dental erosion--a comparison of stylus profilometry and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM).
    Heurich E; Beyer M; Jandt KD; Reichert J; Herold V; Schnabelrauch M; Sigusch BW
    Dent Mater; 2010 Apr; 26(4):326-36. PubMed ID: 20047756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative study to quantify demineralized enamel in deciduous and permanent teeth using laser- and light-induced fluorescence techniques.
    Ando M; van Der Veen MH; Schemehorn BR; Stookey GK
    Caries Res; 2001; 35(6):464-70. PubMed ID: 11799288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro quantification of white spot enamel lesions adjacent to fixed orthodontic appliances using quantitative light-induced fluorescence and DIAGNOdent.
    Aljehani A; Tranaeus S; Forsberg CM; Angmar-MÃ¥nsson B; Shi XQ
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2004 Dec; 62(6):313-8. PubMed ID: 15848974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing different methods to assess erosive lesion depths and progression in vitro.
    Stenhagen KR; Hove LH; Holme B; Taxt-Lamolle S; Tveit AB
    Caries Res; 2010; 44(6):555-61. PubMed ID: 21071941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The erosive potential of commercially available mouthrinses on enamel as measured by Quantitative Light-induced Fluorescence (QLF).
    Pretty IA; Edgar WM; Higham SM
    J Dent; 2003 Jul; 31(5):313-9. PubMed ID: 12799115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of surface defects in early caries assessment using quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF) and micro-digital-photography (MDP).
    Meharry MR; Dawson D; Wefel JS; Harless JD; Kummet CM; Xiao X
    J Dent; 2012 Nov; 40(11):955-61. PubMed ID: 22892465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of calcium analysis, longitudinal microradiography and profilometry for the quantitative assessment of erosion in dentine.
    Ganss C; Lussi A; Scharmann I; Weigelt T; Hardt M; Klimek J; Schlueter N
    Caries Res; 2009; 43(6):422-9. PubMed ID: 19864904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of quantitative light-induced fluorescence, digital photography and transverse microradiography for quantification of enamel remineralization.
    Cochrane NJ; Walker GD; Manton DJ; Reynolds EC
    Aust Dent J; 2012 Sep; 57(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 22924348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relationship between fluorescence loss of QLF and depth of demineralization in an enamel erosion model.
    Nakata K; Nikaido T; Ikeda M; Foxton RM; Tagami J
    Dent Mater J; 2009 Sep; 28(5):523-9. PubMed ID: 19822981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of transverse microradiography to quantify mineral loss by erosion in bovine enamel.
    Amaechi BT; Higham SM; Edgar WM
    Caries Res; 1998; 32(5):351-6. PubMed ID: 9701660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Methods for the measurement and characterization of erosion in enamel and dentine.
    Schlueter N; Hara A; Shellis RP; Ganss C
    Caries Res; 2011; 45 Suppl 1():13-23. PubMed ID: 21625129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measuring initial enamel erosion with quantitative light-induced fluorescence and optical coherence tomography: an in vitro validation study.
    Chew HP; Zakian CM; Pretty IA; Ellwood RP
    Caries Res; 2014; 48(3):254-62. PubMed ID: 24481141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Knoop and Vickers surface microhardness and transverse microradiography for the study of early caries lesion formation in human and bovine enamel.
    Lippert F; Lynch RJ
    Arch Oral Biol; 2014 Jul; 59(7):704-10. PubMed ID: 24798979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ability of quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF) to assess the activity of white spot lesions during dehydration.
    Ando M; Stookey GK; Zero DT
    Am J Dent; 2006 Feb; 19(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 16555651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantifying the demineralisation of enamel using a hyperspectral camera measuring fluorescence loss.
    Roberts JM; Bradshaw DJ; Lynch RJM; Higham SM; Valappil SP
    Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2021 Dec; 36():102603. PubMed ID: 34728422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using bearing area parameters to quantify early erosive tooth surface changes in enamel: a pilot study.
    Field J; German M; Waterhouse P
    J Dent; 2013 Nov; 41(11):1060-7. PubMed ID: 23998946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.