BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19238719)

  • 1. Multivariate prediction of upper limb prosthesis acceptance or rejection.
    Biddiss EA; Chau TT
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2008 Jul; 3(4):181-92. PubMed ID: 19238719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of functionality in acquired and congenital upper extremity child amputees.
    Korkmaz M; Erbahçeci F; Ulger O; Topuz S
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2012; 46(4):262-8. PubMed ID: 22951757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Functional outcome of patients with proximal upper limb deficiency--acquired and congenital.
    Datta D; Selvarajah K; Davey N
    Clin Rehabil; 2004 Mar; 18(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 15053126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Upper-limb prosthetics: critical factors in device abandonment.
    Biddiss E; Chau T
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Dec; 86(12):977-87. PubMed ID: 18090439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adjustment and Satisfaction with Prosthesis Among People after Upper Limb Amputation in Slovenia.
    Šosterič K; Burger H; Vidmar G
    Ortop Traumatol Rehabil; 2020 Apr; 22(2):85-93. PubMed ID: 32468997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prosthesis rejection in acquired major upper-limb amputees: a population-based survey.
    Østlie K; Lesjø IM; Franklin RJ; Garfelt B; Skjeldal OH; Magnus P
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2012 Jul; 7(4):294-303. PubMed ID: 22112174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prescription of the first prosthesis and later use in children with congenital unilateral upper limb deficiency: A systematic review.
    Meurs M; Maathuis CG; Lucas C; Hadders-Algra M; van der Sluis CK
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2006 Aug; 30(2):165-73. PubMed ID: 16990227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patient Perspectives on Osseointegration: A National Survey of Veterans with Upper Limb Amputation.
    Resnik L; Benz H; Borgia M; Clark MA
    PM R; 2019 Dec; 11(12):1261-1271. PubMed ID: 30784201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Body schema and body awareness of amputees.
    Mayer A; Kudar K; Bretz K; Tihanyi J
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2008 Sep; 32(3):363-82. PubMed ID: 18677671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use and satisfaction with prosthetic limb devices and related services.
    Pezzin LE; Dillingham TR; Mackenzie EJ; Ephraim P; Rossbach P
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2004 May; 85(5):723-9. PubMed ID: 15129395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. User-relevant factors determining prosthesis choice in persons with major unilateral upper limb defects: A meta-synthesis of qualitative literature and focus group results.
    Kerver N; van Twillert S; Maas B; van der Sluis CK
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0234342. PubMed ID: 32603326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Upper limb traumatic amputees. Review of prosthetic use.
    Gaine WJ; Smart C; Bransby-Zachary M
    J Hand Surg Br; 1997 Feb; 22(1):73-6. PubMed ID: 9061532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Consumer concerns and the functional value of prostheses to upper limb amputees.
    Kejlaa GH
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1993 Dec; 17(3):157-63. PubMed ID: 8134275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Survey of upper limb prosthesis users in Sweden, the United Kingdom and Canada.
    Kyberd PJ; Hill W
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2011 Jun; 35(2):234-41. PubMed ID: 21697204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Consumer design priorities for upper limb prosthetics.
    Biddiss E; Beaton D; Chau T
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2007 Nov; 2(6):346-57. PubMed ID: 19263565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Management of upper limb deformities. Treatment concepts through the years].
    Koller A; Wetz HH
    Orthopade; 2006 Nov; 35(11):1137-8, 1140-2, 1144-5. PubMed ID: 17061077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prosthetic usage in major upper extremity amputations.
    Wright TW; Hagen AD; Wood MB
    J Hand Surg Am; 1995 Jul; 20(4):619-22. PubMed ID: 7594289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prosthetic use in adult upper limb amputees: a comparison of the body powered and electrically powered prostheses.
    Millstein SG; Heger H; Hunter GA
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1986 Apr; 10(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 3725563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales and quality of life in people with lower-limb amputation.
    Gallagher P; Maclachlan M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2004 May; 85(5):730-6. PubMed ID: 15129396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Feminine identity and functional benefits are key factors in women's decision making about upper limb prostheses: a case series.
    Resnik L; Klinger S; Gill A; Ekerholm Biester S
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2019 Feb; 14(2):194-208. PubMed ID: 29741966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.