219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19239409)
1. Automated pre-ejection period variation indexed to tidal volume predicts fluid responsiveness after cardiac surgery.
Vistisen ST; Struijk JJ; Larsson A
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2009 Apr; 53(4):534-42. PubMed ID: 19239409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automated pre-ejection period variation predicts fluid responsiveness in low tidal volume ventilated pigs.
Vistisen ST; Koefoed-Nielsen J; Larsson A
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2010 Feb; 54(2):199-205. PubMed ID: 19681786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Should dynamic parameters for prediction of fluid responsiveness be indexed to the tidal volume?
Vistisen ST; Koefoed-Nielsen J; Larsson A
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2010 Feb; 54(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 19764908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients ventilated with low tidal volume and high positive end-expiratory pressure.
Huang CC; Fu JY; Hu HC; Kao KC; Chen NH; Hsieh MJ; Tsai YH
Crit Care Med; 2008 Oct; 36(10):2810-6. PubMed ID: 18766099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pre-ejection period to estimate cardiac preload dependency in mechanically ventilated pigs submitted to severe hemorrhagic shock.
Giraud R; Siegenthaler N; Morel DR; Bendjelid K
J Trauma; 2011 Sep; 71(3):702-7. PubMed ID: 21378580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The respiratory change in preejection period: a new method to predict fluid responsiveness.
Bendjelid K; Suter PM; Romand JA
J Appl Physiol (1985); 2004 Jan; 96(1):337-42. PubMed ID: 14660495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predicting volume responsiveness by using the end-expiratory occlusion in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients.
Monnet X; Osman D; Ridel C; Lamia B; Richard C; Teboul JL
Crit Care Med; 2009 Mar; 37(3):951-6. PubMed ID: 19237902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Limitations of arterial pulse pressure variation and left ventricular stroke volume variation in estimating cardiac pre-load during open heart surgery.
Rex S; Schälte G; Schroth S; de Waal EE; Metzelder S; Overbeck Y; Rossaint R; Buhre W
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2007 Oct; 51(9):1258-67. PubMed ID: 17714575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dynamic preload indicators fail to predict fluid responsiveness in open-chest conditions.
de Waal EE; Rex S; Kruitwagen CL; Kalkman CJ; Buhre WF
Crit Care Med; 2009 Feb; 37(2):510-5. PubMed ID: 19114886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [An evaluation of stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated elderly patients with severe sepsis].
Yu YH; Dai HW; Yan ML; Gong SJ; Cai GL; Zhang ZC; Chen J; Yan J
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2009 Aug; 21(8):463-5. PubMed ID: 19695166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Online monitoring of pulse pressure variation to guide fluid therapy after cardiac surgery.
Auler JO; Galas F; Hajjar L; Santos L; Carvalho T; Michard F
Anesth Analg; 2008 Apr; 106(4):1201-6, table of contents. PubMed ID: 18349193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ventilation-induced plethysmographic variations predict fluid responsiveness in ventilated postoperative cardiac surgery patients.
Wyffels PA; Durnez PJ; Helderweirt J; Stockman WM; De Kegel D
Anesth Analg; 2007 Aug; 105(2):448-52. PubMed ID: 17646504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of changes in blood pressure and airway pressures on parameters of fluid responsiveness.
Sakka SG; Becher L; Kozieras J; van Hout N
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2009 Apr; 26(4):322-7. PubMed ID: 19401662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients: comparing stroke volume variation by FloTrac/Vigileo and automated pulse pressure variation.
Khwannimit B; Bhurayanontachai R
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2012 Feb; 29(2):64-9. PubMed ID: 21946822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prediction of fluid responsiveness using respiratory variations in left ventricular stroke area by transoesophageal echocardiographic automated border detection in mechanically ventilated patients.
Cannesson M; Slieker J; Desebbe O; Farhat F; Bastien O; Lehot JJ
Crit Care; 2006; 10(6):R171. PubMed ID: 17163985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of sternotomy on heart-lung interaction in patients undergoing cardiac surgery receiving pressure-controlled mechanical ventilation.
De Blasi RA; Palmisani S; Cigognetti L; Iasenzaniro M; Arcioni R; Mercieri M; Pinto G
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2007 Apr; 51(4):441-6. PubMed ID: 17378782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The ability of stroke volume variations obtained with Vigileo/FloTrac system to monitor fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients.
Cannesson M; Musard H; Desebbe O; Boucau C; Simon R; Hénaine R; Lehot JJ
Anesth Analg; 2009 Feb; 108(2):513-7. PubMed ID: 19151280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pre-ejection period variations predict the fluid responsiveness of septic ventilated patients.
Feissel M; Badie J; Merlani PG; Faller JP; Bendjelid K
Crit Care Med; 2005 Nov; 33(11):2534-9. PubMed ID: 16276164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The intrathoracic blood volume index as an indicator of fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients with acute circulatory failure: a comparison with central venous pressure.
Muller L; Louart G; Bengler C; Fabbro-Peray P; Carr J; Ripart J; de La Coussaye JE; Lefrant JY
Anesth Analg; 2008 Aug; 107(2):607-13. PubMed ID: 18633040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of increased intra-abdominal pressure on fluid responsiveness predicted by pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation in a porcine model.
Renner J; Gruenewald M; Quaden R; Hanss R; Meybohm P; Steinfath M; Scholz J; Bein B
Crit Care Med; 2009 Feb; 37(2):650-8. PubMed ID: 19114894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
