125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19239569)
21. Factors influencing child witnesses.
Cederborg AC
Scand J Psychol; 2004 Jul; 45(3):197-205. PubMed ID: 15182237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Eyewitness testimony and perceived credibility of youth with mild intellectual disability.
Peled M; Iarocci G; Connolly DA
J Intellect Disabil Res; 2004 Oct; 48(Pt 7):699-703. PubMed ID: 15357691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Reliability of assessing the sensory perception of children with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities: a case study.
Vlaskamp C; Cuppen-Fonteine H
Child Care Health Dev; 2007 Sep; 33(5):547-51. PubMed ID: 17725776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The influences of delay and severity of intellectual disability on event memory in children.
Brown DA; Lewis CN; Lamb ME; Stephens E
J Consult Clin Psychol; 2012 Oct; 80(5):829-41. PubMed ID: 22799269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Children exposed to obscene phone calls: what they remember and tell.
Leander L; Granhag PA; Christianson SA
Child Abuse Negl; 2005 Aug; 29(8):871-88. PubMed ID: 16125231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Reconceptualizing children's suggestibility: bidirectional and temporal properties.
Gilstrap LL; Ceci SJ
Child Dev; 2005; 76(1):40-53. PubMed ID: 15693756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluating alternative techniques of questioning mentally retarded persons.
Sigelman CK; Budd EC; Winer JL; Schoenrock CJ; Martin PW
Am J Ment Defic; 1982 Mar; 86(5):511-8. PubMed ID: 7124804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Children with disabilities in the child protective services system: an analog study of investigation and case management.
Manders JE; Stoneman Z
Child Abuse Negl; 2009 Apr; 33(4):229-37. PubMed ID: 19348941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The conceptualisation of dreams by adults with intellectual disabilities: relationship with theory of mind abilities and verbal ability.
Dodd A; Hare DJ; Hendy S
J Intellect Disabil Res; 2008 Apr; 52(Pt 4):337-47. PubMed ID: 18179509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Accommodation needs for carers of and adults with intellectual disability in regional Australia: their hopes for and perceptions of the future.
Eley DS; Boyes J; Young L; Hegney DG
Rural Remote Health; 2009; 9(3):1239. PubMed ID: 19764824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Sexual abuse and preschoolers: Forensic details in regard of question types.
Gagnon K; Cyr M
Child Abuse Negl; 2017 May; 67():109-118. PubMed ID: 28254688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The effect of using trained versus untrained adult respondents in simulated practice interviews about child abuse.
Powell MB; Fisher RP; Hughes-Scholes CH
Child Abuse Negl; 2008 Nov; 32(11):1007-16. PubMed ID: 19027162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Is that what I said?: witnesses' responses to interviewer modifications.
Hunt JS; Borgida E
Law Hum Behav; 2001 Dec; 25(6):583-603. PubMed ID: 11771636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. How interviewers' nonverbal behaviors can affect children's perceptions and suggestibility.
Almerigogna J; Ost J; Akehurst L; Fluck M
J Exp Child Psychol; 2008 May; 100(1):17-39. PubMed ID: 18316091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effects of age and delay on the amount of information provided by alleged sex abuse victims in investigative interviews.
Lamb ME; Sternberg KJ; Esplin PW
Child Dev; 2000; 71(6):1586-96. PubMed ID: 11194258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Support for family carers of children and young people with developmental disabilities and challenging behaviour: what stops it being helpful?
Wodehouse G; McGill P
J Intellect Disabil Res; 2009 Jul; 53(7):644-53. PubMed ID: 19298502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Young children's references to temporal attributes of allegedly experienced events in the course of forensic interviews.
Orbach Y; Lamb ME
Child Dev; 2007; 78(4):1100-20. PubMed ID: 17650128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Developmental differences in the function and use of anatomical dolls during interviews with alleged sexual abuse victims.
Thierry KL; Lamb ME; Orbach Y; Pipe ME
J Consult Clin Psychol; 2005 Dec; 73(6):1125-34. PubMed ID: 16392985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Children's Signaling of Incomprehension: The Diagnosticity of Practice Questions During Interview Instructions.
Henderson HM; Lyon TD
Child Maltreat; 2021 Feb; 26(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 33176442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. An examination of "don't know" responses in forensic interviews with children.
Earhart B; La Rooy DJ; Brubacher SP; Lamb ME
Behav Sci Law; 2014; 32(6):746-61. PubMed ID: 25424612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
