157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19239578)
1. Towards quantifying the aesthetic outcomes of breast cancer treatment: comparison of clinical photography and colorimetry.
Kim MS; Rodney WN; Cooper T; Kite C; Reece GP; Markey MK
J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Feb; 15(1):20-31. PubMed ID: 19239578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantifying the aesthetic outcomes of breast cancer treatment: assessment of artificial scars.
Kim MS; Rodney WN; Reece GG; Cooper T; Markey MK
AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2007 Oct; ():1012. PubMed ID: 18694110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantifying the aesthetic outcomes of breast cancer treatment: assessment of surgical scars from clinical photographs.
Kim MS; Rodney WN; Reece GP; Beahm EK; Crosby MA; Markey MK
J Eval Clin Pract; 2011 Dec; 17(6):1075-82. PubMed ID: 20630016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The challenge of objective scar colour assessment in a clinical setting: using digital photography.
Anderson JC; Hallam MJ; Nduka C; Osorio D
J Wound Care; 2015 Aug; 24(8):379-87. PubMed ID: 26562381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability and Photographic Equivalency of the Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) Scale, an Outcome Measure for Postoperative Scars.
Kantor J
JAMA Dermatol; 2017 Jan; 153(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 27806156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Digital imaging analysis of scar aesthetics.
Valente JH; Jay GD; Schmidt ST; Oh AK; Reinert SE; Zabbo CP
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2012 Mar; 25(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 22343599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Scarbase Duo(®): Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability and validity of a compact dual scar assessment tool.
Fell M; Meirte J; Anthonissen M; Maertens K; Pleat J; Moortgat P
Burns; 2016 Mar; 42(2):336-44. PubMed ID: 26774602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of Fespixon in Postoperative Scar Cosmesis Using Quantitative Digital Photography Analysis.
Huang TR; Chen SG; Chen JC; Liu SC
Aesthet Surg J; 2023 May; 43(6):NP427-NP437. PubMed ID: 36624624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The evaluation of a clinical scar scale for porcine burn scars.
Wang XQ; Kravchuk O; Liu PY; Kempf M; Boogaard CV; Lau P; Cuttle L; Mill J; Kimble RM
Burns; 2009 Jun; 35(4):538-46. PubMed ID: 19201543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Objective assessment of cosmetic outcome of scars].
Handschel JG; Depprich RA; Dirksen D; Runte C; Zimmermann A; Böröcz Z; Kübler NR
Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 2005 Nov; 9(6):396-9. PubMed ID: 16142457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An investigation into digital imaging in assessing cosmetic outcome after breast surgery.
Eadie C; Herd A; Stallard S
J Audiov Media Med; 2000 Mar; 23(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 10829368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A practical and objective approach to scar colour assessment.
Hallam MJ; McNaught K; Thomas AN; Nduka C
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Oct; 66(10):e271-6. PubMed ID: 23880014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of Dermal Thickness on Scars in Women with Type III-IV Fitzpatrick Skin.
Ince B; Dadaci M; Oltulu P; Altuntas Z; Bilgen F
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2015 Jun; 39(3):318-24. PubMed ID: 25787787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automatic colorimetric calibration of human wounds.
Van Poucke S; Haeghen YV; Vissers K; Meert T; Jorens P
BMC Med Imaging; 2010 Mar; 10():7. PubMed ID: 20298541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Towards quantifying the aesthetic outcomes of breast cancer treatment: assessment of surgical scars.
Kim MS; Rodney WN; Peng J; Reece GP; Markey MK
AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2005; 2005():1009. PubMed ID: 16779296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing two objective methods for the aesthetic evaluation of breast cancer conservative treatment.
Cardoso MJ; Cardoso JS; Wild T; Krois W; Fitzal F
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2009 Jul; 116(1):149-52. PubMed ID: 18777134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantification of erythema using digital camera and computer-based colour image analysis: a multicentre study.
Setaro M; Sparavigna A
Skin Res Technol; 2002 May; 8(2):84-8. PubMed ID: 12060471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Objective and subjective scar aesthetics in minimal access vs conventional access parathyroidectomy and thyroidectomy surgical procedures: a paired cohort study.
O'Connell DA; Diamond C; Seikaly H; Harris JR
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Jan; 134(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 18209143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of macular hole size measured by optical coherence tomography, digital photography, and clinical examination.
Benson SE; Schlottmann PG; Bunce C; Charteris DG
Eye (Lond); 2008 Jan; 22(1):87-90. PubMed ID: 17901884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Colour slides or digital photography in diabetes screening--a comparison.
Henricsson M; Karlsson C; Ekholm L; Kaikkonen P; Sellman A; Steffert E; Tyrberg M
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2000 Apr; 78(2):164-8. PubMed ID: 10794249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
