183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19241149)
1. An assessment of the psychometric properties of Lithuanian versions of DSM-IV-MR-J and SOGS-RA.
Skokauskas N; Burba B; Freedman D
J Gambl Stud; 2009 Jun; 25(2):263-71. PubMed ID: 19241149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prevalence estimates of gambling participation and problem gambling among 16-18-year-old students in Iceland: a comparison of the SOGS-RA and DSM-IV-MR-J.
Olason DT; Sigurdardottir KJ; Smari J
J Gambl Stud; 2006; 22(1):23-39. PubMed ID: 16374661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Italian Adolescent Gambling Behaviour: Psychometric Evaluation of the South Oaks Gambling Screen: Revised for Adolescents (SOGS-RA) among a sample of Italian students.
Colasante E; Gori M; Bastiani L; Scalese M; Siciliano V; Molinaro S
J Gambl Stud; 2014 Dec; 30(4):789-801. PubMed ID: 23740346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability, validity, and cut scores of the south oaks gambling screen (SOGS) for Chinese.
Tang CS; Wu AM; Tang JY; Yan EC
J Gambl Stud; 2010 Mar; 26(1):145-58. PubMed ID: 19680794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The SOGS-RA vs. the MAGS-7: prevalence estimates and classification congruence.
Langhinrichsen-Rohling J; Rohling ML; Rohde P; Seeley JR
J Gambl Stud; 2004; 20(3):259-81. PubMed ID: 15353924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A critical review of adolescent problem gambling assessment instruments.
Stinchfield R
Int J Adolesc Med Health; 2010; 22(1):77-93. PubMed ID: 20491419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Concordance between the SOGS-RA and the DSM-IV criteria for pathological gambling among youth.
Ladouceur R; Ferland F; Poulin C; Vitaro F; Wiebe J
Psychol Addict Behav; 2005 Sep; 19(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 16187805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability, validity and classification accuracy of the South Oaks Gambling Screen in a Brazilian sample.
de Oliveira MP; da Silveira DX; de Carvalho SV; Collakis ST; Bizeto J; Silva MT
J Gambl Stud; 2009 Dec; 25(4):557-68. PubMed ID: 19774450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability, validity, and classification accuracy of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS).
Stinchfield R
Addict Behav; 2002; 27(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 11800216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Using a Rasch model to examine the utility of the South Oaks Gambling Screen across clinical and community samples.
Strong DR; Lesieur HR; Breen RB; Stinchfield R; Lejuez CW
Addict Behav; 2004 May; 29(3):465-81. PubMed ID: 15050667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliability, validity, and classification accuracy of a Spanish translation of a measure of DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for pathological gambling.
Jiménez-Murcia S; Stinchfield R; Alvarez-Moya E; Jaurrieta N; Bueno B; Granero R; Aymamí MN; Gómez-Peña M; Martínez-Giménez R; Fernández-Aranda F; Vallejo J
J Gambl Stud; 2009 Mar; 25(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 18592357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Empirical measures vs. perceived gambling severity among youth: why adolescent problem gamblers fail to seek treatment.
Hardoon K; Derevensky JL; Gupta R
Addict Behav; 2003 Jul; 28(5):933-46. PubMed ID: 12788266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The South Oaks Gambling Screen-revised Adolescent (SOGS-RA) revisited: a cut-point analysis.
Boudreau B; Poulin C
J Gambl Stud; 2007 Sep; 23(3):299-308. PubMed ID: 17180721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Examining DSM-IV criteria for pathological gambling: psychometric properties and evidence from cognitive biases.
Lakey CE; Goodie AS; Lance CE; Stinchfield R; Winters KC
J Gambl Stud; 2007 Dec; 23(4):479-98. PubMed ID: 17453325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating the South Oaks Gambling Screen with DSM-IV and DSM-5 criteria: results from a diverse community sample of gamblers.
Goodie AS; MacKillop J; Miller JD; Fortune EE; Maples J; Lance CE; Campbell WK
Assessment; 2013 Oct; 20(5):523-31. PubMed ID: 23946283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Parental modeling, attachment, and supervision as moderators of adolescent gambling.
Magoon ME; Ingersoll GM
J Gambl Stud; 2006; 22(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 16385392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. At-risk and problem gambling among adolescents: a convenience sample of first-year junior high school students in Finland.
Castrén S; Grainger M; Lahti T; Alho H; Salonen AH
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy; 2015 Mar; 10():9. PubMed ID: 25879923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prevalence estimates of adolescent gambling: a comparison of the SOGS-RA, DSM-IV-J, and the GA 20 questions.
Derevensky JL; Gupta R
J Gambl Stud; 2000; 16(2-3):227-51. PubMed ID: 14634314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Reliability and validity of the modified Japanese version of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS)].
Kido M; Shimazaki T
Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2007 Feb; 77(6):547-52. PubMed ID: 17447464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. DSM-IV-J criteria: a scoring error that may be modifying the estimates of pathological gambling among youths.
Jacques C; Ladouceur R
J Gambl Stud; 2003; 19(4):427-31. PubMed ID: 14634301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
