BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19241224)

  • 1. Attitudes to mode of hysterectomy--a survey-based study among Swedish gynecologists.
    Persson P; Hellborg T; Brynhildsen J; Fredrikson M; Kjølhede P
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(3):267-74. PubMed ID: 19241224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attitudes toward mode of hysterectomy: a survey-based study among German gynecologists.
    David M; Wild D; Wernecke KD; Siedentopf F
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Oct; 164(2):216-20. PubMed ID: 22765973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Gynecologists' attitudes toward hysterectomy: is the sex of the clinician a factor?
    Brummitt K; Harmanli OH; Gaughan J; Dandolu V; Chatwani AJ; Hernandez E
    J Reprod Med; 2006 Jan; 51(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 16482772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minimally invasive hysterectomies-a survey on attitudes and barriers among practicing gynecologists.
    Einarsson JI; Matteson KA; Schulkin J; Chavan NR; Sangi-Haghpeykar H
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 20226403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gynecologists' characteristics associated with the likelihood of performing laparoscopic-assisted hysterectomy: a nationwide population-based study.
    Huang CC; Wu MP; Huang YT
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Apr; 161(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 22300773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Why has the acceptance of laparoscopic hysterectomy been slow? Results of an anonymous survey of Australian gynecologists.
    Englund M; Robson S
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(6):724-8. PubMed ID: 17980333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of laparoscopy-assisted hysterectomies with conventional hysterectomies.
    Abdollahi SF; Bahlouli A; Mostafa PG; Rasooli S; Morteza G
    Saudi Med J; 2009 Jun; 30(6):813-6. PubMed ID: 19526166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Incidence and patient characteristics of vaginal cuff dehiscence after different modes of hysterectomies.
    Hur HC; Guido RS; Mansuria SM; Hacker MR; Sanfilippo JS; Lee TT
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(3):311-7. PubMed ID: 17478361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hysterectomy on benign indications in Sweden 1987-2003: a nationwide trend analysis.
    Lundholm C; Forsgren C; Johansson AL; Cnattingius S; Altman D
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 19140043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Trends in various types of surgery for hysterectomy and distribution by patient age, surgeon age, and hospital accreditation: 10-year population-based study in Taiwan.
    Wu MP; Huang KH; Long CY; Tsai EM; Tang CH
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(5):612-9. PubMed ID: 20656565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of physician gender and specialty on utilization of hysterectomy in New York, 2001-2005.
    Gretz H; Bradley WH; Zakashansky K; Nezhat F; Bohren DL; Kreiger K; Rubin E; Sokolow A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 199(4):347.e1-6. PubMed ID: 18639208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A series of 3190 laparoscopic hysterectomies for benign disease from 1990 to 2006: evaluation of complications compared with vaginal and abdominal procedures.
    Donnez O; Jadoul P; Squifflet J; Donnez J
    BJOG; 2009 Mar; 116(4):492-500. PubMed ID: 19016683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hysterectomy on benign indication in Denmark 1988-1998. A register based trend analysis.
    Gimbel H; Settnes A; Tabor A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2001 Mar; 80(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 11207494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of preoperative vaginal cleansing on postoperative infectious morbidity in abdominal total hysterectomy for benign indications.
    Kjølhede P; Halili S; Löfgren M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(4):408-16. PubMed ID: 19235564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Laparoscopic hysterectomy: eliciting preference of performers and colleagues via conjoint analysis.
    Twijnstra AR; Stiggelbout AM; de Kroon CD; Jansen FW
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 21803663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Swedish gynecologists' and general practitioners' views on the climacteric period: knowledge, attitudes and management strategies.
    Andersson K; Pedersen AT; Mattsson LA; Milsom I
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1998 Oct; 77(9):909-16. PubMed ID: 9808379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Danish gynecologists' opinion about hysterectomy on benign indication: results of a survey.
    Gimbel H; Ottesen B; Tabor A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2002 Dec; 81(12):1123-31. PubMed ID: 12519108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attitudes and practices about postmenopausal hormone therapy among female gynecologists in Brazil.
    Filho AS; Soares Júnior JM; Arkader J; Maciel GA; Baracat EC
    Maturitas; 2005 Jun; 51(2):146-53. PubMed ID: 15917155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Changing routes of hysterectomy: a cross sectional and comparative study.
    Shrestha NS; Saha R; Karki C
    Nepal Med Coll J; 2010 Sep; 12(3):176-9. PubMed ID: 21446367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Seventeen-year review of hysterectomy procedures in a university clinic in Istanbul (1985-2001).
    Aksu F; Gezer A; Oral E
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2004 Dec; 270(4):217-22. PubMed ID: 14513260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.