These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

338 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19241572)

  • 1. Influence of visual masking technique on the assessment of 2 red wines by trained and consumer assessors.
    Ross CF; Bohlscheid J; Weller K
    J Food Sci; 2008 Aug; 73(6):S279-85. PubMed ID: 19241572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contribution of non-volatile and aroma fractions to in-mouth sensory properties of red wines: wine reconstitution strategies and sensory sorting task.
    Sáenz-Navajas MP; Campo E; Avizcuri JM; Valentin D; Fernández-Zurbano P; Ferreira V
    Anal Chim Acta; 2012 Jun; 732():64-72. PubMed ID: 22688035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of wine composition on consumer perception and acceptance of Brettanomyces metabolites using temporal check-all-that-apply methodology.
    Schumaker MR; Diako C; Castura JC; Edwards CG; Ross CF
    Food Res Int; 2019 Feb; 116():963-972. PubMed ID: 30717029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Identification of sensory attributes that drive the likeability of Korean rice wines by American panelists. [Corrected].
    Kwak HS; Ahn BH; Kim HR; Lee SY
    J Food Sci; 2015 Jan; 80(1):S161-70. PubMed ID: 25559310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. White wines aroma recovery and enrichment: Sensory-led aroma selection and consumer perception.
    Lezaeta A; Bordeu E; Agosin E; Pérez-Correa JR; Varela P
    Food Res Int; 2018 Jun; 108():595-603. PubMed ID: 29735095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of the form of glasses on the perception of wine flavors: a study in untrained subjects.
    Hummel T; Delwiche JF; Schmidt C; Hüttenbrink KB
    Appetite; 2003 Oct; 41(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 14550318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Trained and consumer panel evaluation of sparkling wines sweetened to brut or demi sec residual sugar levels with three different sugars.
    McMahon KM; Diako C; Aplin J; Mattinson DS; Culver C; Ross CF
    Food Res Int; 2017 Sep; 99(Pt 1):173-185. PubMed ID: 28784474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The enjoyment of red wine is influenced by the shape of the wine glass].
    Hüttenbrink KB; Schmidt C; Delwiche JF; Hummel T
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2001 Feb; 80(2):96-100. PubMed ID: 11253572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Alcohol, Tannins, and Mannoprotein and their Interactions Influence the Sensory Properties of Selected Commercial Merlot Wines: A Preliminary Study.
    Diako C; McMahon K; Mattinson S; Evans M; Ross C
    J Food Sci; 2016 Aug; 81(8):S2039-48. PubMed ID: 27442722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of phenol composition on the sensory profile of smoke affected wines.
    Kelly D; Zerihun A
    Molecules; 2015 May; 20(6):9536-49. PubMed ID: 26016545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Volatile and sensory profiling of Shiraz wine in response to alcohol management: comparison of harvest timing versus technological approaches.
    Longo R; Blackman JW; Antalick G; Torley PJ; Rogiers SY; Schmidtke LM
    Food Res Int; 2018 Jul; 109():561-571. PubMed ID: 29803484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dynamic sensory description of Rioja Alavesa red wines made by different winemaking practices by using Temporal Dominance of Sensations.
    Etaio I; Meillon S; Pérez-Elortondo FJ; Schlich P
    J Sci Food Agric; 2016 Aug; 96(10):3492-9. PubMed ID: 26572805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Red Wine Dryness Perception Related to Physicochemistry.
    Watrelot AA; Heymann H; Waterhouse AL
    J Agric Food Chem; 2020 Mar; 68(10):2964-2972. PubMed ID: 30983339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exploring mouthfeel in model wines: Sensory-to-instrumental approaches.
    Laguna L; Sarkar A; Bryant MG; Beadling AR; Bartolomé B; Victoria Moreno-Arribas M
    Food Res Int; 2017 Dec; 102():478-486. PubMed ID: 29195975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Drivers of high-involvement consumers' intention to buy PDO wines: Valpolicella PDO case study.
    Capitello R; Agnoli L; Begalli D
    J Sci Food Agric; 2016 Aug; 96(10):3407-17. PubMed ID: 26538481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sensory characterization of young South American red wines classified by varietal and origin.
    Llobodanin LG; Barroso LP; Castro IA
    J Food Sci; 2014 Aug; 79(8):S1595-603. PubMed ID: 25039987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Chemical, chromatic, and sensory attributes of 6 red wines produced with prefermentative cold soak.
    Casassa LF; Bolcato EA; Sari SE
    Food Chem; 2015 May; 174():110-8. PubMed ID: 25529659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of the nonvolatile wine matrix composition on the in vivo aroma release from wines.
    Muñoz-González C; Martín-Álvarez PJ; Moreno-Arribas MV; Pozo-Bayón MÁ
    J Agric Food Chem; 2014 Jan; 62(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 24328128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differences in Astringency Subqualities Evaluated by Consumers and Trained Assessors on Sangiovese Wine Using Check-All-That-Apply (CATA).
    Rinaldi A; Vecchio R; Moio L
    Foods; 2021 Jan; 10(2):. PubMed ID: 33494331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Wine flavor: chemistry in a glass.
    Polásková P; Herszage J; Ebeler SE
    Chem Soc Rev; 2008 Nov; 37(11):2478-89. PubMed ID: 18949121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.