89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19241698)
1. [3-dimensional finite elements vitodynamics analysis for mandible after mandibular angle osteotomy].
Li HC; Li DM; Gui L; Lü CS; Zhang ZY
Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Nov; 24(6):416-20. PubMed ID: 19241698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of the closing and opening muscle groups on jaw condyle biomechanics after prominent mandibular angle osteotomy.
Ma L; Qi X; Qin J; Zhong S; Zhang B; Zhang Y; Xia H
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Jul; 41(5):408-11. PubMed ID: 23218504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of different fixation methods following sagittal split ramus osteotomies using three-dimensional finite elements analysis. Part 1: advancement surgery-posterior loading.
Erkmen E; Simşek B; Yücel E; Kurt A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Jul; 34(5):551-8. PubMed ID: 16053877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Stress analysis of the mandible by 3D FEA in normal human being under three loading conditions].
Sun J; Zhang FQ; Wang DW; Yu J; Wang CT
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2004 Feb; 13(1):41-3. PubMed ID: 15007480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stress distribution in the temporomandibular joint after mandibular protraction: a 3-dimensional finite element method study. Part 1.
Gupta A; Kohli VS; Hazarey PV; Kharbanda OP; Gunjal A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):737-48. PubMed ID: 19524833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stress distribution in the temporomandibular joint after mandibular protraction: a 3-dimensional finite element study. Part 2.
Gupta A; Hazarey PV; Kharbanda OP; Kohli VS; Gunjal A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):749-56. PubMed ID: 19524834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A three-dimensional computer model of the human mandible in two simulated standard trauma situations.
Gallas Torreira M; Fernandez JR
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2004 Oct; 32(5):303-7. PubMed ID: 15458672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Finite element analysis of the biomechanics of human mandible in response to impact force].
Liu Y; Li JY; Zhao WD
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2008 Jan; 28(1):70-2. PubMed ID: 18227031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Department of a finite element model of the Head Model of HYBRID III Dummy with the Human Mandible].
Zhang HZ; Huang XM; Li SY; Liu CM; Ma CS; Du HL; Huang SL
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Dec; 83(24):2166-9. PubMed ID: 14720428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The influences of the stress distribution on the condylar cartilage surface by Herbst appliance under various bite reconstruction--a three dimensional finite element analysis].
Hu L; Zhao Z; Song J; Fan Y; Jiang W; Chen J
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2001 Feb; 19(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 12539638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution in mandible advanced with Forsus].
Chai ZW; Li LH; Song JL; Deng F; Fan YB
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 May; 44(5):293-6. PubMed ID: 19575988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Study on the changes of TMJ stress before and after sagittal split ramus osteotomy by 3D finite element method].
Fang B; Zhou Q; Shen GF; Cai Z
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2004 Feb; 13(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 15007483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Effect of change in occlusal contact areas of the mandibular second molar on temporomandibular joint stress distribution: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis].
Zhang Y; Wang MQ; Ling W
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Jul; 40(4):291-3. PubMed ID: 16191369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-dimensional finite element analysis used to compare methods of fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy: setback surgery-posterior loading.
Erkmen E; Simşek B; Yücel E; Kurt A
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Apr; 43(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 15749208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stability of locking and conventional 2.0-mm miniplate/screw systems after sagittal split ramus osteotomy: finite element analysis.
Oguz Y; Uckan S; Ozden AU; Uckan E; Eser A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Aug; 108(2):174-7. PubMed ID: 19615655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of necrotic lesion size and rotational degree on the stress reduction in transtrochanteric rotational osteotomy for femoral head osteonecrosis--a three-dimensional finite-element simulation.
Lee MS; Tai CL; Senan V; Shih CH; Lo SW; Chen WP
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Nov; 21(9):969-76. PubMed ID: 16806615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Finite-element-analysis of different screw-diameters in the sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible.
Maurer P; Holweg S; Schubert J
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1999 Dec; 27(6):365-72. PubMed ID: 10870755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The comparison of angular and curvilinear marginal mandibulectomy on force distribution with three dimensional finite element analysis.
Ertem SY; Uckan S; Ozden UA
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Apr; 41(3):e54-8. PubMed ID: 22890086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.
Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the stress of mandibular incisor with different level of alveolar bone].
Shang S; Li C; Qian Q; Liang L
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Aug; 22(4):725-9. PubMed ID: 16156259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
