These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19241698)

  • 21. Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of the dentate human mandible.
    Korioth TW; Romilly DP; Hannam AG
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1992 May; 88(1):69-96. PubMed ID: 1510115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of Class II activator and Class II activator high-pull headgear combination on the mandible: a 3-dimensional finite element stress analysis study.
    Ulusoy C; Darendeliler N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):490.e9-15. PubMed ID: 18405811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of implant body designs and threaded designs of dental implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Huang HL; Chang CH; Hsu JT; Fallgatter AM; Ko CC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):551-62. PubMed ID: 17929515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An examination of the stress distribution in a soft-lined acrylic resin mandibular complete denture by finite element analysis.
    Shim JS; Watts DC
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 11203603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Creation of a three-dimensional model of the mandible and the TMJ in vivo by means of the finite element method.
    Castaño MC; Zapata U; Pedroza A; Jaramillo JD; Roldán S
    Int J Comput Dent; 2002; 5(2-3):87-99. PubMed ID: 12680039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of mandibular angle ostectomy using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Song J; Zhu S; Luo E; Hu J; Feng G
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 25(4):e375-8. PubMed ID: 25006954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [The boundary design of mandibular model by means of the three-dimensional finite element method].
    Zhou X; Zhao Z; Zhao M; Fan Y
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Feb; 17(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 12539316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of stress changes in the mandible with a fixed functional appliance: a finite element study.
    Chaudhry A; Sidhu MS; Chaudhary G; Grover S; Chaudhry N; Kaushik A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Feb; 147(2):226-34. PubMed ID: 25636557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of a cuneiform-geometry implant.
    Cruz M; Wassall T; Toledo EM; Barra LP; Lemonge AC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):675-84. PubMed ID: 14579955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Establishment of sequential software processing for a biomechanical model of mandibular reconstruction with custom-made plate.
    Li P; Tang Y; Li J; Shen L; Tian W; Tang W
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 Sep; 111(3):642-9. PubMed ID: 23810232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of different bone quality on stress distribution in an implant-supported crown.
    Sevimay M; Turhan F; Kiliçarslan MA; Eskitascioglu G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Mar; 93(3):227-34. PubMed ID: 15775923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The stability of bimaxillary osteotomy after correction of skeletal Class II malocclusion.
    Ayoub AF; Stirrups DR; Moos KF
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1993; 8(3):155-70. PubMed ID: 8301164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Changes of mandibular movement tracings after the correction of mandibular protrusion by bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Wang D; Fu H; Zeng R; Yang X
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 67(10):2238-44. PubMed ID: 19761919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Study on stress distribution of the condyle.
    Hu M; Zhou J; Hong M; Ma H; Tian X
    Chin Med J (Engl); 1997 Oct; 110(10):811-3. PubMed ID: 9642316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [The influence on masticatory function after curved osteotomy of prominent mandibular angle].
    Tan WY; Qiu S; Wang M; Chen Y; Niu F; Yu B; Liu JF; Gui L
    Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Mar; 26(2):93-5. PubMed ID: 20540309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Development of a three-dimensional finite element model of a human mandible containing endosseous dental implants. I. Mathematical validation and experimental verification.
    Al-Sukhun J; Kelleway J; Helenius M
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2007 Jan; 80(1):234-46. PubMed ID: 17078048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Stress analysis in the TMJ during jaw opening by use of a three-dimensional finite element model based on magnetic resonance images.
    Tanaka E; Rodrigo DP; Tanaka M; Kawaguchi A; Shibazaki T; Tanne K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Oct; 30(5):421-30. PubMed ID: 11720045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of different inter-implant distances on the stress distribution around endosseous implants in posterior mandible: a 3D finite element analysis.
    Simşek B; Erkmen E; Yilmaz D; Eser A
    Med Eng Phys; 2006 Apr; 28(3):199-213. PubMed ID: 15979921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.