These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19241954)
21. Reproductive Ethics in Commercial Surrogacy: Decision-Making in IVF Clinics in New Delhi, India. Tanderup M; Reddy S; Patel T; Nielsen BB J Bioeth Inq; 2015 Sep; 12(3):491-501. PubMed ID: 26133889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Social, ethical, medical & legal aspects of surrogacy: an Indian scenario. Sharma RS Indian J Med Res; 2014 Nov; 140 Suppl(Suppl 1):S13-6. PubMed ID: 25673533 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Implications of the legalization of non-commercial surrogacy for local kinship and motherhood in Vietnamese society. Hibino Y Reprod Biomed Online; 2015 Feb; 30(2):113-4. PubMed ID: 25496836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Access to Assisted Reproductive Technologies, surrogacy, same sex couple parenting]. Belaisch Allart J Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2012 Aug; 40 Suppl 1():3-7. PubMed ID: 23141591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Global trade and assisted reproductive technologies: regulatory challenges in international surrogacy. Nelson E J Law Med Ethics; 2013; 41(1):240-53. PubMed ID: 23581668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Privacy and the regulation of the new reproductive technologies: a decision-making approach. Sedillo Lopez A Fam Law Q; 1988; 22(2):173-97. PubMed ID: 16100818 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Redefining parenthood. Halperin-Kaddari R Calif West Int Law J; 1999; 29(2):313-37. PubMed ID: 12611404 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Philosophocal and legislation aspects of surrogacy. Zakariadze A Georgian Med News; 2011 Jun; (195):18-25. PubMed ID: 21778535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. From Baby M. to Jaycee B.: fathers, mothers, and children in the brave new world. Hale JV J Contemp Law; 1998; 24(2):335-75. PubMed ID: 12465647 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The ever-widening gap between the science of artificial reproductive technology and the laws which govern that technology. Havins WE; Dalessio JJ De Paul Law Rev; 1999; 48(4):825-66. PubMed ID: 12484397 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Couple leave Italy after rebuff over surrogate motherhood. Stanley A N Y Times Web; 2000 May; ():A13. PubMed ID: 11785515 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. A trust analysis of a gestational carrier's right to abortion. Yamamoto K; Moore SA Fordham Law Rev; 2001 Oct; 70(1):93-186. PubMed ID: 11763875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. [Regulation of surrogate gestation and maternity in the state of Tabasco]. Ortiz MÁ Rev Derecho Genoma Hum; 2015; (42):97-133. PubMed ID: 26665348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Surrogacy: An international comparative analysis of the fundamental legislative principles of Ukraine. Sylkina SM; Mynbatyrova NK; Umbetbayeva ZB; Shulanbekova GK; Baitukayeva DU Med Sci Law; 2020 Jan; 60(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 31707927 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The United Kingdom Revisits Its Surrogacy Law. Latham SR Hastings Cent Rep; 2020 Jan; 50(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 32068270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Artificial reproduction technologies and conflict of laws: an initial approach. Grammaticaki-Alexiou A LA Law Rev; 2000; 60(4):1113-21. PubMed ID: 12452137 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. On a Romanian attempt to legislate on medically assisted human reproduction. Cutas DE Bioethics; 2008 Jan; 22(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 18154589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Artificial techniques of procreation: legal and moral aspects. Shifman P Isr Law Rev; 1993; 27(4):600-9. PubMed ID: 14682331 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]