These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19242050)

  • 1. Physical characterization and performance comparison of active- and passive-pixel CMOS detectors for mammography.
    Elbakri IA; McIntosh BJ; Rickey DW
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Mar; 54(6):1743-55. PubMed ID: 19242050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Physical characterization of a high-resolution CCD detector for mammography.
    Elbakri IA; Tesic MM; Xiong Q
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(8):2171-83. PubMed ID: 17404462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-dimensional cascaded system analysis of a 50 µm pixel pitch wafer-scale CMOS active pixel sensor x-ray detector for digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Zhao C; Vassiljev N; Konstantinidis AC; Speller RD; Kanicki J
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 62(5):1994-2017. PubMed ID: 28072394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Imaging performance of the hybrid pixel detectors XPAD3-S.
    Brunner FC; Clemens JC; Hemmer C; Morel C
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Mar; 54(6):1773-89. PubMed ID: 19258683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Empirical electro-optical and x-ray performance evaluation of CMOS active pixels sensor for low dose, high resolution x-ray medical imaging.
    Arvanitis CD; Bohndiek SE; Royle G; Blue A; Liang HX; Clark A; Prydderch M; Turchetta R; Speller R
    Med Phys; 2007 Dec; 34(12):4612-25. PubMed ID: 18196789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cascaded systems analysis of a-Se/a-Si and a-InGaZnO TFT passive and active pixel sensors for tomosynthesis.
    Sengupta A; Zhao C; Konstantinidis A; Kanicki J
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 Jan; 64(2):025012. PubMed ID: 30523916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Large area CMOS active pixel sensor x-ray imager for digital breast tomosynthesis: Analysis, modeling, and characterization.
    Zhao C; Kanicki J; Konstantinidis AC; Patel T
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6294-308. PubMed ID: 26520722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Characterization study of an intensified complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor active pixel sensor.
    Griffiths JA; Chen D; Turchetta R; Royle GJ
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2011 Mar; 82(3):033709. PubMed ID: 21456753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modeling and evaluation of a high-resolution CMOS detector for cone-beam CT of the extremities.
    Cao Q; Sisniega A; Brehler M; Stayman JW; Yorkston J; Siewerdsen JH; Zbijewski W
    Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 45(1):114-130. PubMed ID: 29095489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mobile C-Arm with a CMOS detector: Technical assessment of fluoroscopy and Cone-Beam CT imaging performance.
    Sheth NM; Zbijewski W; Jacobson MW; Abiola G; Kleinszig G; Vogt S; Soellradl S; Bialkowski J; Anderson WS; Weiss CR; Osgood GM; Siewerdsen JH
    Med Phys; 2018 Dec; 45(12):5420-5436. PubMed ID: 30339271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance of a novel wafer scale CMOS active pixel sensor for bio-medical imaging.
    Esposito M; Anaxagoras T; Konstantinidis AC; Zheng Y; Speller RD; Evans PM; Allinson NM; Wells K
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 Jul; 59(13):3533-54. PubMed ID: 24909098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 50 μm pixel pitch wafer-scale CMOS active pixel sensor x-ray detector for digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Zhao C; Konstantinidis AC; Zheng Y; Anaxagoras T; Speller RD; Kanicki J
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Dec; 60(23):8977-9001. PubMed ID: 26540090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detective quantum efficiency measured as a function of energy for two full-field digital mammography systems.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 May; 54(9):2845-61. PubMed ID: 19384004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retrospective analysis of a detector fault for a full field digital mammography system.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(21):5655-73. PubMed ID: 17047276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Imaging characteristics evaluation of a digital radiography system.
    Moro L; Pannella A; Bassetti C; Fantinato D; Baldi M; Bertoli G
    Radiol Med; 2003; 106(1-2):94-102. PubMed ID: 12951556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of the performance of modern screen-film and digital mammography systems.
    Monnin P; Gutierrez D; Bulling S; Lepori D; Valley JF; Verdun FR
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jun; 50(11):2617-31. PubMed ID: 15901958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Imaging performance of amorphous selenium based flat-panel detectors for digital mammography: characterization of a small area prototype detector.
    Zhao W; Ji WG; Debrie A; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 2003 Feb; 30(2):254-63. PubMed ID: 12607843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Amorphous In-Ga-Zn-O thin-film transistor active pixel sensor x-ray imager for digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Zhao C; Kanicki J
    Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):091902. PubMed ID: 25186389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Physical image properties of a complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor imager for mammography systems.
    Okamoto C; Kodera Y
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2018 Sep; 11(3):284-293. PubMed ID: 29845552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance of a high fill factor, indirect detection prototype flat-panel imager for mammography.
    El-Mohri Y; Antonuk LE; Zhao Q; Wang Y; Li Y; Du H; Sawant A
    Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):315-27. PubMed ID: 17278517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.