295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19242050)
1. Physical characterization and performance comparison of active- and passive-pixel CMOS detectors for mammography.
Elbakri IA; McIntosh BJ; Rickey DW
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Mar; 54(6):1743-55. PubMed ID: 19242050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Physical characterization of a high-resolution CCD detector for mammography.
Elbakri IA; Tesic MM; Xiong Q
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(8):2171-83. PubMed ID: 17404462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-dimensional cascaded system analysis of a 50 µm pixel pitch wafer-scale CMOS active pixel sensor x-ray detector for digital breast tomosynthesis.
Zhao C; Vassiljev N; Konstantinidis AC; Speller RD; Kanicki J
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 62(5):1994-2017. PubMed ID: 28072394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Imaging performance of the hybrid pixel detectors XPAD3-S.
Brunner FC; Clemens JC; Hemmer C; Morel C
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Mar; 54(6):1773-89. PubMed ID: 19258683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Empirical electro-optical and x-ray performance evaluation of CMOS active pixels sensor for low dose, high resolution x-ray medical imaging.
Arvanitis CD; Bohndiek SE; Royle G; Blue A; Liang HX; Clark A; Prydderch M; Turchetta R; Speller R
Med Phys; 2007 Dec; 34(12):4612-25. PubMed ID: 18196789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cascaded systems analysis of a-Se/a-Si and a-InGaZnO TFT passive and active pixel sensors for tomosynthesis.
Sengupta A; Zhao C; Konstantinidis A; Kanicki J
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Jan; 64(2):025012. PubMed ID: 30523916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Large area CMOS active pixel sensor x-ray imager for digital breast tomosynthesis: Analysis, modeling, and characterization.
Zhao C; Kanicki J; Konstantinidis AC; Patel T
Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6294-308. PubMed ID: 26520722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Characterization study of an intensified complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor active pixel sensor.
Griffiths JA; Chen D; Turchetta R; Royle GJ
Rev Sci Instrum; 2011 Mar; 82(3):033709. PubMed ID: 21456753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modeling and evaluation of a high-resolution CMOS detector for cone-beam CT of the extremities.
Cao Q; Sisniega A; Brehler M; Stayman JW; Yorkston J; Siewerdsen JH; Zbijewski W
Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 45(1):114-130. PubMed ID: 29095489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mobile C-Arm with a CMOS detector: Technical assessment of fluoroscopy and Cone-Beam CT imaging performance.
Sheth NM; Zbijewski W; Jacobson MW; Abiola G; Kleinszig G; Vogt S; Soellradl S; Bialkowski J; Anderson WS; Weiss CR; Osgood GM; Siewerdsen JH
Med Phys; 2018 Dec; 45(12):5420-5436. PubMed ID: 30339271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance of a novel wafer scale CMOS active pixel sensor for bio-medical imaging.
Esposito M; Anaxagoras T; Konstantinidis AC; Zheng Y; Speller RD; Evans PM; Allinson NM; Wells K
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Jul; 59(13):3533-54. PubMed ID: 24909098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 50 μm pixel pitch wafer-scale CMOS active pixel sensor x-ray detector for digital breast tomosynthesis.
Zhao C; Konstantinidis AC; Zheng Y; Anaxagoras T; Speller RD; Kanicki J
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Dec; 60(23):8977-9001. PubMed ID: 26540090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detective quantum efficiency measured as a function of energy for two full-field digital mammography systems.
Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2009 May; 54(9):2845-61. PubMed ID: 19384004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Retrospective analysis of a detector fault for a full field digital mammography system.
Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(21):5655-73. PubMed ID: 17047276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Imaging characteristics evaluation of a digital radiography system.
Moro L; Pannella A; Bassetti C; Fantinato D; Baldi M; Bertoli G
Radiol Med; 2003; 106(1-2):94-102. PubMed ID: 12951556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of the performance of modern screen-film and digital mammography systems.
Monnin P; Gutierrez D; Bulling S; Lepori D; Valley JF; Verdun FR
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jun; 50(11):2617-31. PubMed ID: 15901958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Imaging performance of amorphous selenium based flat-panel detectors for digital mammography: characterization of a small area prototype detector.
Zhao W; Ji WG; Debrie A; Rowlands JA
Med Phys; 2003 Feb; 30(2):254-63. PubMed ID: 12607843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Amorphous In-Ga-Zn-O thin-film transistor active pixel sensor x-ray imager for digital breast tomosynthesis.
Zhao C; Kanicki J
Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):091902. PubMed ID: 25186389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Physical image properties of a complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor imager for mammography systems.
Okamoto C; Kodera Y
Radiol Phys Technol; 2018 Sep; 11(3):284-293. PubMed ID: 29845552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance of a high fill factor, indirect detection prototype flat-panel imager for mammography.
El-Mohri Y; Antonuk LE; Zhao Q; Wang Y; Li Y; Du H; Sawant A
Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):315-27. PubMed ID: 17278517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
