330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19242392)
1. Evaluation of the buccal vestibule-palatal diffusion of 4% articaine hydrochloride in impacted maxillary third molar extractions.
Lima-Júnior JL; Dias-Ribeiro E; de Araújo TN; Ferreira-Rocha J; Honfi-Júnior ES; Sarmento CF; Seabra FR; de Sousa Mdo S
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2009 Mar; 14(3):E129-32. PubMed ID: 19242392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the efficiencies of permanent maxillary tooth removal performed with single buccal infiltration versus routine buccal and palatal injection.
Fan S; Chen WL; Yang ZH; Huang ZQ
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Mar; 107(3):359-63. PubMed ID: 18996033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is permanent maxillary tooth removal without palatal injection possible?
Uckan S; Dayangac E; Araz K
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Dec; 102(6):733-5. PubMed ID: 17138173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Articaine Versus Lidocaine Concentration in the Palatal Tissues After Supraperiosteal Buccal Infiltration Anesthesia.
Al-Mahalawy H; Abuohashish H; Chathoth S; Al-Masoud N; Al-Jandan B
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Feb; 76(2):315.e1-315.e7. PubMed ID: 29102601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative study of the anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 2% lidocaine in inferior alveolar nerve block during surgical extraction of impacted lower third molars.
Sierra Rebolledo A; Delgado Molina E; Berini Aytís L; Gay Escoda C
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2007 Mar; 12(2):E139-44. PubMed ID: 17322803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of buccal infiltration of 4% articaine with 1 : 100,000 and 1 : 200,000 epinephrine for extraction of maxillary third molars with pericoronitis: a pilot study.
Lima JL; Dias-Ribeiro E; Ferreira-Rocha J; Soares R; Costa FW; Fan S; Sant'ana E
Anesth Prog; 2013; 60(2):42-5. PubMed ID: 23763558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Feasibility of permanent maxillary tooth removal using articaine anesthesia without palatal injection].
Peng M; Zhu ZM; Yang XM
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Aug; 26(4):416-8. PubMed ID: 18780504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Anesthetic Efficacy of Articaine and Lidocaine in Equivalent Doses as Buccal and Non-Palatal Infiltration for Maxillary Molar Extraction: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.
Majid OW; Ahmed AM
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Apr; 76(4):737-743. PubMed ID: 29257943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Articaine and mepivacaine efficacy in postoperative analgesia for lower third molar removal: a double-blind, randomized, crossover study.
Colombini BL; Modena KC; Calvo AM; Sakai VT; Giglio FP; Dionísio TJ; Trindade AS; Lauris JR; Santos CF
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Aug; 102(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 16876058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is it possible to anesthetize palatal tissues with buccal 4% articaine injection?
Ozeç I; Taşdemir U; Gümüş C; Solak O
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 May; 68(5):1032-7. PubMed ID: 20223573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine and 2% lidocaine for maxillary buccal infiltration in patients with irreversible pulpitis.
Srinivasan N; Kavitha M; Loganathan CS; Padmini G
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jan; 107(1):133-6. PubMed ID: 19101495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of articaine and lignocaine for uncomplicated maxillary exodontia.
Luqman U; Majeed Janjua OS; Ashfaq M; Irfan H; Mushtaq S; Bilal A
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2015 Mar; 25(3):181-4. PubMed ID: 25772957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Infiltration anesthesia for extraction of the mandibular molars.
El-Kholey KE
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Oct; 71(10):1658.e1-5. PubMed ID: 24040947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effects of tramadol added to articaine on anesthesia duration.
Pozos AJ; Martinez R; Aguirre P; Perez J
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Nov; 102(5):614-7. PubMed ID: 17052637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of the clinical anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine and 0.5% bupivacaine (both with 1:200,000 epinephrine) for lower third molar removal.
Gregorio LV; Giglio FP; Sakai VT; Modena KC; Colombini BL; Calvo AM; Sipert CR; Dionísio TJ; Lauris JR; Faria FA; Trindade Junior AS; Santos CF
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Jul; 106(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 18420431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of articaine and prilocaine anesthesia by infiltration in maxillary and mandibular arches.
Haas DA; Harper DG; Saso MA; Young ER
Anesth Prog; 1990; 37(5):230-7. PubMed ID: 2096746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lack of differential effect by Ultracaine (articaine) and Citanest (prilocaine) in infiltration anaesthesia.
Haas DA; Harper DG; Saso MA; Young ER
J Can Dent Assoc; 1991 Mar; 57(3):217-23. PubMed ID: 2043997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Extraction of Maxillary Teeth Using Articaine Without a Palatal Injection: A Comparison Between the Anterior and Posterior Regions of the Maxilla.
Bataineh AB; Al-Sabri GA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Jan; 75(1):87-91. PubMed ID: 27528103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficacy of articaine and lidocaine in a primary intraligamentary injection administered with a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system.
Berlin J; Nusstein J; Reader A; Beck M; Weaver J
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Mar; 99(3):361-6. PubMed ID: 15716846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Anesthetic Efficacy of Articaine and Lidocaine During Primary Maxillary Molar Extractions in Children.
Mittal M; Sharma S; Kumar A; Chopra R; Srivastava D
Pediatr Dent; 2015; 37(7):520-4. PubMed ID: 26883609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
