These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19242785)

  • 1. Police lie detection accuracy: the effect of lie scenario.
    O'Sullivan M; Frank MG; Hurley CM; Tiwana J
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Dec; 33(6):530-8. PubMed ID: 19242785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detecting true lies: police officers' ability to detect suspects' lies.
    Mann S; Vrij A; Bull R
    J Appl Psychol; 2004 Feb; 89(1):137-49. PubMed ID: 14769126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Home runs and humbugs: Comment on Bond and DePaulo (2008).
    O'Sullivan M
    Psychol Bull; 2008 Jul; 134(4):493-7; discussion 501-3. PubMed ID: 18605815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Why do lie-catchers fail? A lens model meta-analysis of human lie judgments.
    Hartwig M; Bond CF
    Psychol Bull; 2011 Jul; 137(4):643-59. PubMed ID: 21707129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Strategic use of evidence during police interviews: when training to detect deception works.
    Hartwig M; Granhag PA; Strömwall LA; Kronkvist O
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Oct; 30(5):603-19. PubMed ID: 16977348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lie-detection biases among male police interrogators, prisoners, and laypersons.
    Elaad E
    Psychol Rep; 2009 Dec; 105(3 Pt 2):1047-56. PubMed ID: 20229908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cues to deception and ability to detect lies as a function of police interview styles.
    Vrij A; Mann S; Kristen S; Fisher RP
    Law Hum Behav; 2007 Oct; 31(5):499-518. PubMed ID: 17211691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. "Intuitive" lie detection of children's deception by law enforcement officials and university students.
    Leach AM; Talwar V; Lee K; Bala N; Lindsay RC
    Law Hum Behav; 2004 Dec; 28(6):661-85. PubMed ID: 15732652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Deception detection expertise.
    Bond GD
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Aug; 32(4):339-51. PubMed ID: 17690956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. False-evidence ploys and interrogations: mock jurors' perceptions of false-evidence ploy type, deception, coercion, and justification.
    Forrest KD; Woody WD; Brady SE; Batterman KC; Stastny BJ; Bruns JA
    Behav Sci Law; 2012; 30(3):342-64. PubMed ID: 22315159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detecting deception in children: A meta-analysis.
    Gongola J; Scurich N; Quas JA
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Feb; 41(1):44-54. PubMed ID: 27685642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The reliability of lie detection performance.
    Leach AM; Lindsay RC; Koehler R; Beaudry JL; Bala NC; Lee K; Talwar V
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Feb; 33(1):96-109. PubMed ID: 18594955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of deception judgments.
    Bond CF; DePaulo BM
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2006; 10(3):214-34. PubMed ID: 16859438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. New measures improve the accuracy of the directed-lie test when detecting deception using a mock crime.
    Bell BG; Kircher JC; Bernhardt PC
    Physiol Behav; 2008 Jun; 94(3):331-40. PubMed ID: 18343464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Individual differences in judging deception: accuracy and bias.
    Bond CF; Depaulo BM
    Psychol Bull; 2008 Jul; 134(4):477-92. PubMed ID: 18605814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neuroscience, lie-detection, and the law: contrary to the prevailing view, the suitability of brain-based lie-detection for courtroom or forensic use should be determined according to legal and not scientific standards.
    Schauer F
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2010 Mar; 14(3):101-3. PubMed ID: 20060772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Subjective cues to deception/honesty in a high stakes situation: an exploratory approach.
    Wright Whelan C; Wagstaff GF; Wheatcroft JM
    J Psychol; 2015; 149(5):517-34. PubMed ID: 25975577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Experienced and novice officers' generalized communication suspicion and veracity judgments.
    Masip J; Alonso H; Herrero C; Garrido E
    Law Hum Behav; 2016 Apr; 40(2):169-81. PubMed ID: 26844912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Different physiological reactions when observing lies versus truths: Initial evidence and an intervention to enhance accuracy.
    Ten Brinke L; Lee JJ; Carney DR
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2019 Sep; 117(3):560-578. PubMed ID: 30869984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Unconscious processes improve lie detection.
    Reinhard MA; Greifeneder R; Scharmach M
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Nov; 105(5):721-39. PubMed ID: 24219784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.