These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19242814)

  • 1. An assessment of cause and effect decision-making model for firm environmental knowledge management capacities in uncertainty.
    Tseng ML
    Environ Monit Assess; 2010 Feb; 161(1-4):549-64. PubMed ID: 19242814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using hybrid method to evaluate the green performance in uncertainty.
    Tseng ML; Lan LW; Wang R; Chiu A; Cheng HP
    Environ Monit Assess; 2011 Apr; 175(1-4):367-85. PubMed ID: 20571885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Application of fuzzy DEMATEL to develop a cause and effect model of municipal solid waste management in Metro Manila.
    Tseng ML; Lin YH
    Environ Monit Assess; 2009 Nov; 158(1-4):519-33. PubMed ID: 18951134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Stochastic Multi-Attribute Method for Measuring Sustainability Performance of a Supplier Based on a Triple Bottom Line Approach in a Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Environment.
    Qu G; Xue R; Li T; Qu W; Xu Z
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Mar; 17(6):. PubMed ID: 32210146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A multi-criteria group decision-making framework for investment assessment of offshore floating wind-solar-aquaculture project under probabilistic linguistic environment.
    Mao Q; Guo M; Lv J; Chen J; Tian M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Mar; 30(14):40752-40782. PubMed ID: 36622615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fuzzy rule-based models for decision support in ecosystem management.
    Adriaenssens V; De Baets B; Goethals PL; De Pauw N
    Sci Total Environ; 2004 Feb; 319(1-3):1-12. PubMed ID: 14967497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nature Disaster Risk Evaluation with a Group Decision Making Method Based on Incomplete Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Preference Relations.
    Tang M; Liao H; Li Z; Xu Z
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Apr; 15(4):. PubMed ID: 29652868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A dynamic generalized fuzzy multi-criteria croup decision making approach for green supplier segmentation.
    Duc DA; Van LH; Yu VF; Chou SY; Hien NV; Chi NT; Toan DV; Dat LQ
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(1):e0245187. PubMed ID: 33493184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A novel intuitionistic fuzzy MCDM-based CODAS approach for locating an authorized dismantling center: a case study of Istanbul.
    Karagoz S; Deveci M; Simic V; Aydin N; Bolukbas U
    Waste Manag Res; 2020 Jun; 38(6):660-672. PubMed ID: 31969081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Preference Utility Set and Its Application in Selection of Fire Rescue Plans.
    Liao H; Si G; Xu Z; Fujita H
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Apr; 15(4):. PubMed ID: 29614019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A new MAGDM method with 2-tuple linguistic bipolar fuzzy Heronian mean operators.
    Naz S; Akram M; Al-Shamiri MMA; Khalaf MM; Yousaf G
    Math Biosci Eng; 2022 Feb; 19(4):3843-3878. PubMed ID: 35341277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Managing water quality of a river using an integrated geographically weighted regression technique with fuzzy decision-making model.
    Singh AP; Dhadse K; Ahalawat J
    Environ Monit Assess; 2019 May; 191(6):378. PubMed ID: 31104168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multiple Attribute Group Decision-Making Methods Based on Trapezoidal Fuzzy Two-Dimensional Linguistic Partitioned Bonferroni Mean Aggregation Operators.
    Yin K; Yang B; Li X
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Jan; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 29364849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Introducing a conceptual model for evaluating health safety environmental performance of residential buildings using the fuzzy decision-making approach.
    Motaghifard A; Omidvari M; Kaazemi A
    Environ Monit Assess; 2019 Dec; 192(1):19. PubMed ID: 31820115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A novel method to use fuzzy soft sets in decision making based on ambiguity measure and Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence: An application in medical diagnosis.
    Wang J; Hu Y; Xiao F; Deng X; Deng Y
    Artif Intell Med; 2016 May; 69():1-11. PubMed ID: 27235800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using a Mixed Model to Explore Evaluation Criteria for Bank Supervision: A Banking Supervision Law Perspective.
    Tsai SB; Chen KY; Zhao H; Wei YM; Wang CK; Zheng Y; Chang LC; Wang J
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(12):e0167710. PubMed ID: 27992449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A hybrid DEMATEL-COPRAS method using interval-valued probabilistic linguistic term set for sustainable hydrogen fuel cell supplier of new energy vehicles.
    Mao Q; Chen J; Lv J; Guo M; Tian M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Jun; 30(29):74236-74264. PubMed ID: 37204570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Induced unbalanced linguistic ordered weighted average and its application in multiperson decision making.
    Marin L; Valls A; Isern D; Moreno A; Merigó JM
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2014; 2014():642165. PubMed ID: 25136677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fuzzy adaptive management of social and ecological carrying capacities for protected areas.
    Prato T
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Jun; 90(8):2551-7. PubMed ID: 19233541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multi-criteria group decision making for evaluating the performance of e-waste recycling programs under uncertainty.
    Wibowo S; Deng H
    Waste Manag; 2015 Jun; 40():127-35. PubMed ID: 25804333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.